UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.              )

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant toSection 240.14a-12.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

      

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þNo fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

      

 

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

      

 

 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

      

 

 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

      

 

 (5)Total fee paid:

 

      

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

      

 

 

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

      

 

 

 (3)Filing Party:

 

      

 

 

 (4)Date Filed:

 

      

 


LOGO

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

   March 17, 201516, 2018 

Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) hereby gives notice that its 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015“2018 Annual Meeting”) will be held at the offices of its subsidiary Transatlantic Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., One Liberty Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, on Friday, April 24, 201527, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposespurposes::

 

 1.To elect fourthree directors for terms expiring in 2018.2021.

 

 2.To consider and take action upon a proposal to approve Alleghany’s 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan.

3.To consider and take action upon a proposal to approve Alleghany’s 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

4.To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.2018.

 

 5.3.To hold an advisory,non-binding vote on executive compensation.

 

 6.4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Holders of Alleghany common stock at the close of business on March 2, 20151, 2018 are entitled to receive this Notice and vote for the election of directors and on each of the other matters set forth above at the 20152018 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of this meeting.thereof.

You are cordially invited to attend the 20152018 Annual Meeting. Representation of your shares at the meeting2018 Annual Meeting is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend in person, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly by using the Internet or telephone, or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 20152018 Annual Meeting by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, by submitting a new proxy with a later date, or by voting in person at the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,
CHRISTOPHER K. DALRYMPLE

Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary

Alleghany Corporation

7 Times Square Tower1411 Broadway, 34th Floor

New York, New York 1003610018

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 24, 2015:27, 2018: Proxy materials relating to the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (notice of meeting, proxy statement, proxy and 20142017 Annual Report to Stockholders onForm 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go toInternet at www.edocumentview.com/YAL to view and obtain the proxy materials online.YAL.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT — TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2015 ANNUAL MEETINGPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

   1 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 2018 ANNUAL MEETING

5

Board of Directors

5

Director Independence

5

Board Leadership

5

Board Role in Risk Oversight

5

Committees of the Board of Directors

6

Director Nominations and Qualifications

8

Communications with Directors

8

Director Retirement Policy

8

Codes of Ethics

   9 

Majority Election of DirectorsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   914 

Director Stock Ownership GuidelinesBoard Composition

   914 

Hedging and Pledging PoliciesDirector Independence

9

Related Party Transactions

9

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

11

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

�� 12

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

13

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   15 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONBoard Leadership

15

Board Meetings

15

Board Evaluation

   16 

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORSChief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

16

Board Role in Risk Oversight

16

Committees of the Board of Directors

   17 

Nominees for ElectionDirectors’ Nominations and Qualifications

18

Other Alleghany Directors

   19 

Compensation ofCommunications with Directors

   2220 

Stockholder Engagement

20

Director Retirement Policy

20

Codes of Ethics

20

Majority Election of Directors

20

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

21

Hedging and Pledging Policies

21

Related Party Transactions

21

PROPOSAL 2. APPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLANPRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

23

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   24 

PROPOSAL 3. APPROVALSECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF THE 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLANDIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

25

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   27 

PROPOSAL 4.1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

28

Nominees for Election

29

Other Alleghany Directors

30

Compensation of Directors

32

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20152017

30

Audit Committee Report

31

PROPOSAL 5. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

32

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   34 

Compensation Philosophy and ObjectivesAudit Committee Report

   3436 

2014 Compensation Program Component SummaryPROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

35

Alleghany Performance in 2014

   37 

Alleghany Long-Term PerformanceCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

   3738 

Compensation Committee ProcessCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   40 

Components of 2014 Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

40

2017 Compensation Program Summary

   42 

Financial Statement RestatementsAlleghany Performance in 2017

   4943 

Hedging and Pledging PoliciesAlleghany Long-Term Performance

   5043 

Executive Officer Stock Ownership GuidelinesCompensation Committee Process

   5046 

Tax ConsiderationsElements of 2017 Compensation

   5048 

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk ManagementFinancial Statement Restatements

51

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

52

Summary Compensation Table

52

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2014

   55 

Hedging and Pledging Policies

55

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

55

Tax Considerations

56

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

57

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

58

Summary Compensation Table

58

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017

60

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

56

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year-End

60

2014 Stock Vested

   61 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 FiscalNonqualified Deferred CompensationYear-End

   6164 


Pension Benefits2017 Stock Vested

63

Payments upon Termination of Employment

   65 

STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALSNonqualified Deferred Compensation

65

Pension Benefits

   67 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONPayments Upon Termination of Employment

   6869 

EXHIBIT A – 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLANCEO Pay Ratio

   A-171 

EXHIBIT B – 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLANSTOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

   B-172

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

73 


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Alleghany Corporation, referred toThis summary highlights selected information that is discussed in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement asProxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the full Proxy Statement before voting. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Proxy Statement to “Alleghany,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,”“our” or “us,” is providing these proxy materials in connection with“us” refer to Alleghany Corporation, references to the solicitation of proxies by the“Board” refer to our Board of Directors, of Alleghany, orreferences to the “Board,” from holders of Alleghany’s outstanding shares of“common stock” refer to our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, orand references to the “common stock,” entitled“2018 Annual Meeting” refer to vote at our 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or the “2015 Annual Meeting,” and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof,thereof.

2018 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Date and Time

Friday, April 27, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. local time

Location

Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.

One Liberty Plaza, 17th Floor

New York, New York

Record Date

March 1, 2018

Mailing Date

On or about March 16, 2018

MEETING AGENDA AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

  Voting MatterBoard’s Recommendation

Additional

   Information   

  Proposal 1:

Election of Directors

FOR each director nominee    pages 28-33

  Proposal 2:

Selection of Independent Accounting FirmFORpages 34 and 35

  Proposal 3:

Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationFORpages 37 to 71

HOW TO VOTE (pages 9-10)

You can vote by any of the following methods:

By Internet

Go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL

By Telephone

If you reside in the United States, Canada or U.S. territories, call toll free
1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

By Mail

If you received a proxy card in the mail, complete, sign, date, and mail the proxy card in the return envelope provided to you

In person

Attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot

If you vote by the Internet or telephone, you must vote no later than 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 27, 2018.

-1-


BOARD NOMINEES (page 29)

William K. Lavin

Age 73

Director since 1992

Chairman of the Audit Committee

Member of the Compensation Committee

LOGO

Mr. Lavin has been a financial consultant since October 1994, and currently serves as a director of Artisanal Brands, Inc., a specialty foods company.

Mr. Lavin’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience as an executive with public and private companies, his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for such companies and his financial literacy.

Phillip M. Martineau

Age 70

Director since 2009

Member of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee

LOGO

Mr. Martineau was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Europe, building materials companies, from June 2005 until his retirement in May 2014.

Mr. Martineau’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of executive operational experience with global companies in the materials and manufacturing sectors, particularly his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of such companies, as well as his experience serving on the boards of directors of other companies.

Raymond L.M. Wong

Age 65

Director since 2006

Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

LOGO

Mr. Wong is currently a Managing Director of Spring Mountain Capital, LP, an investment management company which he joined in 2007. Prior to that, from 2002 until 2007, Mr. Wong was the Managing Member of DeFee Lee Pond Capital LLC, a financial advisory and private investment company. In addition, Mr. Wong is a director of several private companies, including Health Platforms, Inc. (Doctor.com), a healthcare marketing technology company, Hurel Corporation, a life sciences tool company, Oncoceutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, One Clipboard, Inc. (Splash), an event marketing technology company, RiskSense, Inc., a cybersecurity company, and VALC Enterprises, Inc. (Home Captain), a financial technology company.

Mr. Wong’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience, particularly his 25 years as a managing director in the investment banking group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and his financial literacy.

-2-


GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Independence

Seven of our eight directors are independent directors. All of our standing Board committees are chaired by independent directors. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees are 100% independent.

Board Structure

Our Board is divided into three separate classes of directors. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years.

Risk Oversight

Our Board and its committees work with management to diligently monitor and manage risk.

Independent Chairman

Our current Chairman is an independent director. Our policy is that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer.
Board and Committee EvaluationsOur annual Board and committee evaluation processes help promote the effectiveness of the Board and its committees.

Director Tenure

Our Board has an average tenure of approximately 11 years, with half of our current directors joining the Board in 2009 or later.
Stock Ownership
Guidelines
Executive officers are required to hold shares of common stock valued at three to five times their base salary (varies depending on position). Directors are required to hold common stock and/or restricted stock units valued at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board. We have a policy prohibiting hedging and pledging of Alleghany securities by directors and executive officers to discourage excessive risk-taking.

-3-


PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

2017 and long-term financial results highlights are as follows:

Alleghany Performance in 2017

Achieved a 7.4% increase in common stockholders’ equity per share to $553.20 at 2017year-end from $515.24 at 2016year-end despite incurring $511 million ofafter-tax net catastrophe losses representing 6.0% of Alleghany’s capital at the beginning of 2017, in a year when the industry is estimated to have incurred over $130 billion of worldwide catastrophe losses.

Net earnings of $90 million in 2017, compared with $457 million in 2016, primarily reflecting the significant catastrophe losses in 2017.

A consolidated netpre-tax underwriting lossof $316 million on almost $5.0 billion of net premiums earned, which generated a combined ratio of 106.4%. The underwriting loss included $818 million of current yearpre-tax catastrophe losses, which added 16.5 points to the combined ratio and an estimated $265 million of favorable loss reserve development, which reduced the combined ratio by 5.3 points.

Alleghany’s equity and fixed income portfolios significantly outperformed their investment benchmarks.

Sold Pacific Compensation Corporation, or “PacificComp,” to CopperPoint Mutual Insurance Company in December 2017.

Continued to build the manufacturing and service businesses of Alleghany Capital Corporation, or “Alleghany Capital”, including acquiring a majority interest in WWSC Holdings, LLC, a structural steel fabricator and erector, and a minority interest in Wilbert Funeral Services, Inc. Alleghany Capital’s manufacturing and service businesses had operating earnings before taxes of $66 million in 2017, compared with $43 million in 2016.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 2017 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or “MD&A,” with respect to 2017 results, is contained in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the purposes referredyear ended December 31, 2017, or the “Form10-K,” which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,” on February 22, 2018. Readers are urged to hereinreview the Form10-K for a more complete discussion of Alleghany’s financial performance.

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- andten-year average rolling, annualized growth in our common stockholders’ equity per share during the five-year period from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017:

   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per Share
  Annual
Return
    
      Rolling Annualized Average

Year

     Three-Year Ten-Year

2012

    379.13    10.8   8.7   8.8

2013

    412.96    8.9   8.3   8.5

2014

    465.51    12.7   10.8   8.6

2015

    486.02    4.4   8.6   8.6

2016

    515.24    6.0   7.7   7.8

2017

    553.20    7.4   5.9   7.0

Average

       8.4%   8.3%   8.2%

-4-


As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share has compounded over the various time metrics in themid-range of Alleghany’s stated strategic objective of7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.

The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over theten-year period from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2017, compared with the S&P 500, with all values indexed to December 31, 2007. During thisten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 7.0%, compared with a compound annual rate of return of 8.5% for the S&P 500, and the price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 4.8% compound annual rate of return. Alleghany’s stock price performance lagged the growth in stockholders’ equity per share because the price of Alleghany common stock was 132% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2007, compared with 108% on December 31, 2017.

LOGO

As indicated by the data presented in the chart above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental performance and value creation as compared to the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock. As such Alleghany focuses its executive compensation incentive program on building common stockholders’ equity per share over time.

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is intended to provide competitive total compensation to each of Alleghany’s executive officers (as listed on page 24), or the “Named Executive Officers,” that is aligned with the interests of our stockholders in increasing our common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long term, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

-5-


For 2017, this compensation philosophy was evidenced by the following compensation highlights:

CEO total direct compensation (salary, annual cash incentive and long-term equity based awards) was approximately $7.6 million, representing approximately 0.2% of 2017 revenues, and total direct compensation for our Named Executive Officers as a group was approximately $17.9 million, representing approximately 0.4% of 2017 revenues.

86.8% of Mr. Hicks’s 2017 total direct compensation was linked to performance, while performance-linked compensation for our other Named Executive Officers averaged 72.6% of total direct compensation in 2017.

Mr. Hicks’s 2017 total direct compensation increased 2% from 2016 total direct compensation, due to a higher target long-term incentive award, partially offset by a lower annual incentive payout for 2017.

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that payouts for 2017 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $6.2 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) and (ii) 3% of 2017 annual adjustedpre-tax earnings.

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals believed to be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s long-term incentives based 100% on performance.

Elements of 2017 Compensation

The principal elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers and the percentage that these elements represent of the 2017 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers are reflected below.

LOGO

-6-


2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation

Set forth below is the 2017 compensation for each Named Executive Officer as determined under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, plus an additional, final column, entitled “Total Not Including Change in Pension Value.” The amounts reported in this final column differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the “SEC Total” column. The amounts reported in the final column are solely intended to facilitate a stockholder’s understanding of how changes in pension value impact the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table in any given year. To facilitate that understanding, this column shows total compensation without pension value changes. See the 2017 Summary Compensation Table and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These proxy materials are being mailednotes to stockholdersthe table beginning on or about March 17, 2015.page 58 for more information.

Name and Principal Position

 Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  SEC
Total
  Total not
Including
Change
in Pension
Value
 

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000  $  $4,502,372  $2,137,500  $1,844,203  $163,287  $9,647,362  $7,803,159 

President and chief executive officer

        

Joseph P. Brandon

  850,000      2,551,040   1,275,000   137,703   136,930   4,950,673   4,812,970 

Executive Vice President

        

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  670,000      1,005,195   502,000   416,635   106,674   2,700,504   2,283,869 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

        

Roger B. Gorham

  620,000      309,900   310,000   314,528   99,997   1,654,425   1,339,897 

Former Senior Vice President - Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer

        

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  670,000      1,005,195   502,000      107,135   2,284,330   2,284,330 

Senior Vice President and chief financial officer

        

-7-


Long-Term Compensation Highlights

During theten-year performance period set out in the graph on page 5, we believe that Mr. Hicks’s compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below:

10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

($ thousands)

LOGO

  Year  CAGR 
  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year(4) 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  6,522   6,435   6,206   5,636   7,347   7,332   6,216   10,543   6,869   8,573   9,647   12.5  (2.9%)   4.0

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  1,160   1,594   1,066   822   1,922   1,259   (1,232  2,914   (23  946   1,844    

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  5,361   4,840   5,140   4,814   5,425   6,072   7,448   7,629   6,892   7,627   7,803   2.3  0.7  3.8

Indexed TSR

  100   72   71   81   77   90   108   125   129   164   161   (2.0%)   8.7  4.8

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  (4.2)%   8.0  1.0

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100   95   105   116   122   135   147   165   173   183   197   7.4  5.9  7.0

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  5.1  5.2  3.2

(1)Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the impact of stock dividends.

(2)Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013 and 2015, which include a negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” in table.

(3)Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 58, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

(4)Total Shareholder Return for this period reflects that the price of Alleghany common stock was 132% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2007, compared with 108% on December 31, 2017.

-8-


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALLEGHANY’S 20152018 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Q:Q:Why did I receive these proxy materials?

A:You have received these proxy materials because the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of common stock at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Q:Who is entitled to vote at the 20152018 Annual Meeting?

 

A:Alleghany has one class of voting stock outstanding: its common stock. If you were a holder of common stock at the close of business on March 2, 2015,1, 2018, the record date for the 20152018 Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on March 2, 2015,1, 2018, there were 16,006,91415,396,674 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock has one vote.

 

Q:How can I vote my shares?

 

A:You can vote your shares in two ways: either by proxy or in person at the 20152018 Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail. Each of these procedures is more fully explained below. Even if you plan to attend the 20152018 Annual Meeting in person, the Board recommends that you vote promptly by proxy to ensure that your shares are represented at the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:How can I vote my shares by proxy?

 

A:Because many stockholders cannot attend the 20152018 Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy. You may vote your proxy using the Internet, telephone or, if you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, mail, each as more fully explained below. In the case of voting your proxy using the Internet or telephone, the deadline for voting is 1:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on Friday, April 24, 2015.27, 2018. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please see the voting instructions provided by such party.

 

Vote by Internet

  To vote your shares via the Internet, go to the voting website, www.envisionreports.com/YAL. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will have the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers. If you vote via the internet,Internet, you may incur costs such as Internet access fees for which you will be responsible.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Telephone

  If you reside in the United States, Canada or Puerto Rico,U.S. territories, you can vote your shares by telephone by calling the toll-free number provided on the voting website www.envisionreports.com/YAL and on the proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders through individual control numbers.If you received a proxy card in the mail and choose to vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail

  If you received a printed copy of your proxy materials, you can vote your shares by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card to us so that we receive it by the deadline.

 

-1--9-


If you properly sign and return your proxy card or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not specify how to vote, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations: “FOR” each of the Board’s nominees for director; “FOR” the adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan; “FOR” the adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan; “FOR” the ratification of the selection of theour independent registered public accounting;accounting firm; and “FOR” the advisory resolution on executive compensation.

 

Q:How can I vote my shares in person?

 

A:If you wish to vote in person at the 20152018 Annual Meeting, written ballots will be available at the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from that holder of record to be able to vote in person at the meeting.2018 Annual Meeting. Voting by proxy, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will not limit your right to vote at the 20152018 Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. However, if you vote by proxy and also attend the meeting,2018 Annual Meeting, there is no need to vote in person at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote.

 

Q:Q:Are there any rules regarding admission toHow can I attend the 20152018 Annual Meeting?

 

A:EachYou are entitled to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder and guestof Alleghany as of the close of business on March 1, 2018, the record date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the 2018 Annual Meeting. You will need to present valid government-issued identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, to building security at One Liberty Plaza, for admittance. If you are a stockholder of record, your name will be verified against the locationlist of stockholders of record on the record date prior to your admission to the 2018 Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, but hold shares through a broker, bank or nominee (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement prior to March 1, 2018, a copy of the 2015 Annual Meeting, before beingvoting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the building. The meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) and you should leave yourself time for building security procedures.2018 Annual Meeting.

The 2018 Annual Meeting will begin promptly on April 27, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., local time. You should allow adequate time forcheck-in procedures.

 

Q:Can I change my vote?

 

A:Yes. You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the 20152018 Annual Meeting by taking any one of the following actions: (1) follow the instructions given for changing your vote via the Internet or by telephone or deliver a valid written proxy with a later date than the previous proxy; (2) notify in writing the Secretary of Alleghany in writing that you have revoked your proxy (using the address in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders above); or (3) vote in person by written ballot at the 20152018 Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must contact that holder of record to revoke a previously authorized proxy.

 

Q:How many shares must be present to conduct the 20152018 Annual Meeting?

 

A:A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date, or 7,698,338 shares, must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20152018 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” (which are explained below) are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give instructions to my broker?

 

A:

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, but not the record holder. As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your broker by the

-10-


deadline provided in the proxy materials you receive from your broker. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” unless you provide specific voting instructions, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on your behalf, except with respect to theroutine proposals. The ratification of the selection of theour independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4).2) constitutes a routine proposal. For your vote on any other matter to be counted, you will need to provide voting instructions to your broker before the date of the 20152018 Annual Meeting using the instructions provided by your broker.

-2-


A “brokernon-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the broker does not have authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from you. “Brokernon-votes” are counted as present to determine whether there is a quorum for the 20152018 Annual Meeting, but are not counted as votes for or against the proposal in question or as abstentions, nor are they counted to determine the number of votes present for the particular proposal.

 

Q:What vote is required to pass each of the proposals at the 20152018 Annual Meeting?

 

A:Proposal 1: Election of Directors. Each of the fourthree nominees for director who receives at least a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee will be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. In accordance with the majority voting standard in Alleghany’sBy-Laws, or the“By-Laws,” and the Corporate Governance Guidelines of Alleghany, or the “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” as a condition of his or her nomination, each nominee is required to tender to the Board at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation, effective if such nominee does not receive the majority vote required by theBy-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation.

Proposal 2: Adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to adopt the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 3: Adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to adopt the 2015 Management Incentive Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of votes against this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 4: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to ratify the selection of theour independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. The approval of Proposal 2 is a routine proposal on which a broker or other nominee is generally empowered to vote in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner, so brokernon-votes are unlikely to result from this proposal.

Proposal 5:3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to approve the advisory resolution on executive compensation. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. Although this proposal isnon-binding on the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

 

Q:How does the Board recommend I vote?

 

A:The Board recommends that you vote as follows on each proposal:

 

  Voting Matter Board’s Recommendation

Additional

   Information   

  Proposal 1:

Election of Directors

 FOR each director nominee    pages 28 to 33

  Proposal 2: Adoption of the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan

 Selection of Independent Accounting FirmFORpages 34 and 35

  Proposal 3: Adoption of the 2015 Management Incentive Plan

 FOR

  Proposal 4: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered

                          Public Accounting Firm

FOR

  Proposal 5: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 FORpages 37 to 71

 

-11-


Q:What happens if a nominee for director does not stand for election?

 

A:If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, any proxies we receive will be voted in favor of the remaining nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee in place of the nominee who does not stand. We have no reason to expect that any of the nominees will not stand for election.

 

-3-


Q:What happens if additional matters are presented at the 20152018 Annual Meeting?

 

A:If any matters other than the fivethree items of business described in this proxy statementProxy Statement are properly presented for consideration at the 20152018 Annual Meeting, persons named on the voting website and your proxy card will have discretion to vote for you on those matters. At the time this proxy statementProxy Statement was printed, we knew of no other matters to be raised at the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

 

Q:Who nominates the directors?

 

A:John G. Foos, William K. Lavin, Phillip M. Martineau, and Raymond L.M. Wong have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20152018 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates, as described under “Director“Directors’ Nominations and Qualifications” on page 8.19. Additionally, stockholders may nominate individuals for election as directors in accordance with the requirements set forth in Alleghany’s theBy-Laws and described under “Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” on page 67.72.

 

Q:How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

 

A:We pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting. Proxies may be solicited in person by our employees, or by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ore-mail. In addition, we have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc., or “Georgeson,” to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ande-mail. We expect to pay a fee of approximately $9,000$9,500 plus expenses to Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. plus expenses for these services.

 

Q:What is householding? Does Alleghany use it?

 

A:In accordance with a notice sent to eligible stockholders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report to stockholders and one proxy statement to that address unless we received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs.

If, in the future, you wish to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and proxy statement, a separate copy may be obtained, without charge, upon written or oral request to the office of the Secretary, Alleghany Corporation, 7 Times Square Tower,1411 Broadway, 34th Floor, New York, New York 10036,10018, telephone number(212) 752-1356. Eligible stockholders of record who receive multiple copies of our annual report to stockholders and proxy statement can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. Stockholders who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee can request householding by contacting the nominee. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered.

 

-12-


Q:Where can I find more information about Alleghany?

 

A:Alleghany’s website address is www.alleghany.com. Alleghany makes available, free of charge on its website, the documents it files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC.”SEC. Also available on Alleghany’s website are its Financial Personnel Code of Ethics, Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The information contained on Alleghany’s website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.

 

-4--13-


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of DirectorsComposition

Pursuant to Alleghany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws, the Board is divided into three separate classes of directors, which are required to be as nearly equal in number as practicable. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, one class of directors is elected to a term of three years. Currently, there are three standing committees of the Board, consisting of annamely the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Additional information regarding these committees is set out on pages 6 through 8.17 to 19.

The Board currently consists of eleveneight directors. Mr. Rex D. Adams, who has served as a director of Alleghany since 1999, is retiring fromThe directors nominated by the Board effectivefor election at the 2018 Annual Meeting to the class of 2021 are William K. Lavin, Phillip M. Martineau, and Raymond L.M. Wong. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs. Lavin, Martineau and Wong were last elected by stockholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 24, 2015.

As stated in accordance withour Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board “currently believes that it is desirable over time to have a Board of between eight and ten members (allowing that a larger or smaller number may be necessary or advisable in periods of transition or other particular circumstances).” In March 2012, upon the closing of Alleghany’s director retirement policy as described on page 8. As a result, if allacquisition of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” three former members of the nominees for director are elected,board of directors of TransRe joined the Alleghany Board, resulting in a14-person Board. Since that time, Alleghany has intentionally allowed the Board to decrease in size through the mandatory and elective retirements of six Board members, resulting in the current Board size of eight members.

At its current size, and cognizant of additional upcoming mandatory retirements, the Board is evaluating potential new Board members, as well as the characteristics desired in such potential Board members. In this regard, although the Board has not approved any specific criteria that must be met by a candidate, it generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will be reduced effective atenhance the 2015 Annual Meeting from elevenBoard’s ability to ten directors.

The Board held eight meetings in 2014. Each director who servedbest serve Alleghany’s interests. In addition, as a director of Alleghany any time during 2014 attended more than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings ofgeneral matter, the Board does consider diversity, including ethnic and meetingsgender diversity, in identifying and evaluating director candidates, and plans specifically to consider ethnic and gender diversity as one of many factors in evaluating its next potential Board member.

-14-


The following charts illustrate the committeescharacteristics of the Board on which he or she served that were held in 2014. Executive sessions for independentour incumbent directors, are held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board, or the “Chairman,” who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at Annual Meetings of Stockholders. Two directors attended the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.including independence, diversity, age and tenure.

LOGO

Director Independence

Pursuant to the NYSE’s listing standards, Alleghany is required to have a majority of independent directors, and no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Alleghany. The Board has determined that Rex D. Adams, Stephen P. Bradley, Karen Brenner, Ian H. Chippendale, John G. Foos, Jefferson W. Kirby, William K. Lavin, Thomas S. Johnson, Phillipnone of the directors who served during any part of 2017, except Weston M. Martineau, James F. Will (who retired from the Board effective at the 2014 Annual Meeting held on April 25, 2014)Hicks, our President and Raymond L.M. Wong have nochief executive officer, has any material relationship with Alleghany (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Alleghany) other than in their capacities as members of the Board and committees thereof, and thus all of such directors, except Weston M. Hicks, are independent directors of Alleghany. As a result, tenTherefore, seven of Alleghany’s eight current eleven directors are independent directors. All of the director nominees Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong, are independent. Assuming that all of Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong are elected, at the 2015 Annual Meeting, the sizeseven of the Board will be reduced effective at such meeting as a result of Mr. Adams’ retirement from eleven to ten directors, and nine of Alleghany’s teneight directors will be independent directors.independent.

Board Leadership

Currently, the position of Chairman of the Board, or the “Chairman,” and the position of President and chief executive officer are separate. It is the policy of the Board that the Chairman should not be an Alleghany officer. The current Chairman is an independent director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the duties of the Chairman include providing leadership to the Board in managing the business of the Board and ensuring that there is an effective structure for the operation of the Board and its committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate given the composition of the Board and management, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the tenure of a majority of the Board members.

Board Meetings

We have strong director engagement on our Board. The Board held nine meetings in 2017. Each of our directors attended at least 95% of the meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which he or she served in 2017, with seven of our current eight directors attending 100% of the Board and committee meetings. Executive sessions for independent directors are held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Chairman, who is currently an independent director, presides at these executive sessions. Alleghany does not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at annual meetings of stockholders. Three directors attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

-15-


Board Evaluation

The Board believes that an effective director evaluation process allows it to gain insights into the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and its individual members, with the goal of continually enhancing Board performance. In this regard, each year the Board and each of its committees conducts an evaluation of their respective performance, effectiveness and fulfillment of fiduciary duties. The evaluation process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee and is reviewed annually to determine whether it is designed effectively and assures that appropriate feedback is being sought and reviewed. Historically, the Board evaluation was done on an overall basis through completion of a written questionnaire by each director on an anonymous basis to encourage candid feedback, supplemented by individual director interviews with the Chairman.

In 2017, the Board determined to enhance the evaluation process by adding an individual director evaluation component, along with completion of a director skills matrix. In this regard, the Nominating and Governance Committee approved evaluation questions which were to be considered by each director with respect to himself or herself, as well as each other director, along with a skills matrix questionnaire to be completed by each director. The Chairman of the Board, using the evaluation questions as a guide, then solicited a self-evaluation from each director, as well as an evaluation of each other director. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee solicited from each director an evaluation of the Chairman of the Board. At the conclusion of such process, the Chairman of the Board discussed with each director the results of his or her individual evaluation, and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee discussed such matters with the Chairman of the Board. The results of the written overall Board and committee evaluations were reported to and reviewed by the full Board. In general, based upon its most recent evaluation, the Board and each committee were satisfied with their respective performance and considered themselves to be operating effectively.

Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Succession Planning

A key responsibility of our chief executive officer and Board in the area of risk management is ensuring that an effective process is in place to provide continuity of leadership over the long term. At least once each year, our Board conducts a review of chief executive officer and senior management succession planning. During this review, the chief executive officer provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential chief executive officer and senior management successors, succession timing for those positions, and development plans for the potential successors. Our Board reviews potential internal senior management candidates with our chief executive officer, including the qualifications, experience and development priorities for these individuals. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior management’s qualifications, tenure and experience.

Our Board, in coordination with our Nominating and Governance Committee, also establishes steps to address emergency chief executive officer and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency chief executive officer succession planning is intended to enable us to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our business and operations.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk management directly and through its committees. In addition, Alleghany management has several committees that it uses to monitor and manage risk at Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including an Enterprise Risk Management Committee, Reinsurance Security Committee and Ethics and Legal

-5-


Compliance Committee. Alleghany management regularly reports to the Board and, as appropriate, to its committees on management’s risk activities, Alleghany’s exposure and risk assessments. Enterprise Risk Management is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting and the committees ofchief risk officer, other Alleghany management and the Board on management’s activitiesdiscuss existing and emerging risks, controls and procedures, risk tolerances.assessments and initiatives at such meetings. Each year, at the Board’s January meeting, the Board receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and, at the same meeting, considers Alleghany’s three-year financial estimatesprojections and the evaluation of the President and chief executive officer, allowing the Board to consider risk and risk management in the context of Alleghany’s

-16-


strategic plan and management’s performance. Each year, at the Audit Committee’s June meeting, it receives a formal report on enterprise risk management from Alleghany’s chief risk officer and a formal report on legal compliance and ethics from Alleghany’s chief compliance officer, which are also copied to the Board, and the chief risk officer and chief compliance officer subsequently report thereon to the Board. The Board receives updates on material developments with respect to risk management and legal compliance and ethics matters at its other regularly scheduled meetings.

The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of Alleghany’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, performance and independence of independent auditors and the performance of internal audit and internal controls over financial reporting, all of which contribute to risk oversight. The Nominating and Governance Committee ensures development of appropriate corporate governance and oversees the evaluation of the Board and management. The Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether Alleghany’s risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. The Board believes that risk oversight is a responsibility of the entire Board, and it does not look to any individual director or committee to lead it in discharging this responsibility.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Committee Membership

The following table sets forth the current members of each of the committees and the number of meetings held during 2017:

 

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Governance
Committee

Rex D. Adams

Ian H. Chippendale*Rex D. Adams*

Stephen P. Bradley

Thomas S. JohnsonStephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

William K. LavinKaren Brenner

John G. Foos

Phillip M. MartineauJohn G. Foos

William K. Lavin*

Raymond L.M. Wong

Thomas S. Johnson

Raymond L.M. Wong

Phillip M. Martineau

*Committee Chair

Name

  

Audit

  

Compensation

  

Nominating and

    Governance    

Karen Brenner

      Chair

Ian H. Chippendale

      

John G. Foos

      

William K. Lavin

  Chair    

Phillip M. Martineau

      

Raymond L.M. Wong

    Chair  

2017 meetings

  7  6  5

The Board has determined that each committee member is independent as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards with respect to membership on each committee on which he or she serves. The Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has the qualifications set forth in the NYSE’s listing standards regarding financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.

-17-


Committee Responsibilities and 2014 Meetings

Each of the committee’scommittees listed below operates pursuant to a Charter,charter, a copy of which is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. The number of meetings held by each Committee during 2014 and the primary functions of each Committeecommittee are as follows:

 

Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Committee
  Responsibilities

Audit Committee

Seven meetings held in 2014

  

•   Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of theour independent registered public accounting firm, including approving in advance all audit services and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

•   Directly responsible for the evaluation of such firm’s qualifications, performance and independence.

 

-6-


Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Responsibilities

•   Reviews and makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to the following matters:

 

•   the audited consolidated annual financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including Alleghany’s specific disclosures under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation, or “MDMD&A, and critical accounting estimates, to be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and whether to recommend this inclusion;

 

•   the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, including MD&A, to be included in Alleghany’s Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q filed with the SEC;

 

•   Alleghany’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

 

•   the adequacy and effectiveness of Alleghany’s internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;

 

•   the compensation, activities and performance of Alleghany’s internal auditor; and

 

•   the quality and acceptability of Alleghany’s accounting policies, including critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of Alleghany’s financial statements.

 

Compensation Committee

Six meetings held in 2014

  

•   Administers Alleghany’s executive compensation program, including Alleghany’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2007 LTIP,” 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “2012 LTIP,”long-term and 2010 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2010 MIP.”annual incentive plans.

 

•   Reviews and approves the financial goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the chief executive officer; evaluates the chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives; and determines the chief executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation.

 

-18-


Board CommitteeResponsibilities

•   Reviews the annual recommendations of the chief executive officer concerning:

 

•   the compensation of the other Alleghany officers and proposed adjustments to such officers’ compensation; and

 

•   the adjustments proposed to be made to the compensation of the three most highly paid officers of each Alleghany operating subsidiary as recommended by the compensation committee or board of directors (as applicable) for each such operating subsidiary.

 

•   Reports on the actions described above to the Board and makes recommendations with respect to such actions to the Board as the Compensation Committeecommittee may deem appropriate.

 

•   Reviews the compensation of the directors on an annual basis, including compensation for service on committees of the Board, and proposing changes, as appropriate, to the Board.

 

-7-


Board Committee/

Number of Meetings Held in 2014

Responsibilities

Nominating and Governance Committee

Five meetings held in 2014

  

•   Identifies and screens director candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the Board.

 

•   Makes recommendations to the Board as to persons to be (i) nominated by the Board for election to the Board by stockholders or (ii) chosen by the Board to fill newly created directorships or vacancies on the Board.

 

•   Develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Alleghany.

 

•   Oversees the evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Alleghany’s management.

DirectorsDirectors’ Nominations and Qualifications

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends candidates for election to the Board, consistent with general criteria approved by the Board. The Board has not approved any specific criteria that must be met by each director nominee nor established a procedure for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Board believes that establishing such criteria is best left to an evaluation of Alleghany’s needs at the time that a nomination is to be considered. The Board generally seeks members with diverse business and professional backgrounds and outstanding integrity and judgment, and such other skills and experience as will enhance the Board’s ability to best serve Alleghany’s interests. As a general matter, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider diversity in identifying and evaluating possible nominees for director.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will receive at any time and will consider from time to time suggestions from stockholders as to proposed director candidates. In this regard, a stockholder may submit a recommendation regarding a proposed director nominee in writing to the Nominating and Governance Committee in care of the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such persons recommended by a stockholder will be evaluated in the same manner as persons identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

A director is required to notify the Nominating and Governance Committee when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider whether any such change may materially interfere with the director’s service as a director of Alleghany and make a recommendation to the Board in this regard.

-19-


Communications with Directors

Interested parties may communicate directly with any individual director, the independent directors as a group or the Board as a whole by mailing such communication to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Any such communications will be delivered unopened:

 

if addressed to a specific director, to such director;

 

if addressed to the independent directors, to the ChairmanChair of the Nominating and Governance Committee who will report thereon to the independent directors; or

 

if addressed to the Board, to the Chairman of the Board who will report thereon to the Board.

Stockholder Engagement

Alleghany is committed to the interests of its stockholders and recognizes that communicating with stockholders on a regular basis is a critical part of this commitment. In this regard, Alleghany actively engages with its stockholders in order to understand fully their viewpoints concerning Alleghany and to help stockholders better understand Alleghany’s strategy and performance. Management regularly engages with investors by participating in industry conferences, and also meets in person and by telephone with stockholders at other times throughout the year to solicit input and answer questions. Management also communicates to stockholders the Board’s willingness to meet with them upon request and shares stockholder viewpoints with the Board. We believe our regular engagement with stockholders has been productive and provides an open exchange of ideas and perspectives for both Alleghany and its stockholders. Although we are open to meeting with all Alleghany stockholders, in 2017, we met with active investor stockholders who held shares representing approximately 42% of Alleghany’s shares of common stock held by active investors.

Director Retirement Policy

Alleghany’s retirement policy for directors provides that a director must retire from the Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders following his or her 75th birthday.

-8-


Codes of Ethics

Alleghany has adopted an Employee Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees of Alleghany and its subsidiaries, a Financial Personnel Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and all other officers in its Finance Department, a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of each of these documents is available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com or may be obtained, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of Alleghany at Alleghany’s principal executive offices. Alleghany will disclose on its website any substantive amendments to its codes of ethics and any waivers from the provisions of its codes of ethics made with respect to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions), as well as with respect to any other executive officer or any director of Alleghany.

Majority Election of Directors

Alleghany’s TheBy-Laws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors for uncontested elections. In connection with such provision of theBy-Laws, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director nominee, as a condition of his or her nomination, shall tender to the Board at the time of nomination an irrevocable resignation effective if such nominee fails to receive the majority vote required by theBy-Laws and the Board determines to accept such resignation. In the event that a director nominee fails to receive the requisite majority vote, the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate such resignation in light of Alleghany’s

-20-


best interests and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether it should accept the resignation. In making its recommendation, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including:

 

the director’s qualifications;

 

the director’s past and expected future contributions to Alleghany;

 

the overall composition of the Board; and

 

whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause Alleghany to fail to meet any applicable rule or regulation, including the NYSE’s listing standards and federal securities laws.

The Board, by vote of independent directors other than the director whose resignation is being evaluated, will act on the tendered resignation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Directors are expected to achieve ownership of common stock, or equivalent commonrestricted stock units, having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to at least five times the annual board retainer within five years of election to the Board, and to maintain such a level thereafter.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

Alleghany maintains a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits directors from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities that they own. In addition, under such policy, directors are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Related Party Transactions

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy, or “the Policy.” Pursuant to the Policy, all related party transactions must be approved in advance by the Board. Under the Policy, a related party

-9-


transaction means any transaction, other than compensation for services as an officer or director authorized and approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board, in which Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which any of the following persons has or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

 

any director or officer of Alleghany; or

 

any immediate family member of such director or officer, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law orsister-in-law and any person (otherperson(other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director or officer.

A person who has a position or relationship with a firm, corporation or other entity may be deemed to have an indirect interest in any transaction in which that entity engages. However, a person is not deemed to have an interest if such interest arises only from such person’s position as a director of another corporation and/or such person’s direct and indirect ownership of less than 10% of the equity of such firm, corporation or other entity.

Under the Policy, all newly proposed related party transactions are referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review and consideration of its recommendation to the Board. Following this review,

-21-


the related party transaction and the Nominating and Governance Committee’s analysis and recommendations are presented to the full Board (other than any directors interested in the transaction) for approval. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews existing related party transactions annually, with the goals of ensuring that such transactions are being pursued in accordance with all of the understandings and commitments made at the time they were approved, ensuring that payments being made with respect to such transactions are appropriately reviewed and documented, and reaffirming that such transactions remain in the best interests of Alleghany. The Nominating and Governance Committee reports any such findings to the Board.

As initially disclosed in the proxy statement prepared for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Zachary A. Hicks, a son of Weston M. Hicks, Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer, commenced employment with TransRe as an underwriter in March 2017. Zachary Hicks’s 2017 aggregate compensation was $155,000 and was established in accordance with TransRe’s employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications, experience, and responsibilities. Zachary Hicks is also eligible to participate in TransRe’s employee benefit programs on the same basis as other eligible employees. Weston M. Hicks did not participate in TransRe’s compensation decisions relating to Zachary Hicks.

 

-10--22-


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of each person who, based upon filings made by such person with the SEC, as of March 2, 2015,1, 2018, was the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding common stock.

 

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common  Stock(1)   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1)

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total Percent of
Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
  Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
  Total Percent of
Class

BlackRock, Inc.

   1,221,973          1,221,973(2)   7.6     1,457,805       1,457,805(2) 9.5

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

                 

Artisan Partners Limited Partnership

        990,527     990,527(3)   6.2  

875 E. Wisconsin Avenue

Suite 800

Milwaukee, WI 53202

       

The Vanguard Group

   924,482     13,601     938,083(4)   5.8     1,269,399   14,604   1,284,003(3) 8.3

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

                 

Boston Partners

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA 02108

    776,617        776,617(4)  5.0

 

(1)As of March 2, 2015,1, 2018, there were 16,006,91415,396,674 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

(2)According to an amendment dated January 12, 201529, 2018 to a Schedule 13G statement filed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisory company (“BlackRock”), BlackRock has sole voting power over 1,110,1811,337,224 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 1,221,9731,457,805 shares of common stock.

 

(3)According to an amendment dated January 30, 2015February 12, 2018 to a Schedule 13G statement filed jointly by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, an investment adviser (“Artisan Partners”), Artisan Partners Holdings LP (“Artisan Holdings”), Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc., the general partner of Artisan Holdings (“APAM”), Artisan Investments GP LLC, the general partner of Artisan Partners (“Artisan Investments”) and Artisan Partners Funds, Inc. (“Artisan Funds” and, together with Artisan Partners, Artisan Holdings, APAM and Artisan Investments, the “Artisan Parties”), the Artisan Parties share voting and dispositive power over 946,352 shares of common stock and share dispositive power over an additional 44,175 shares of common stock. The statement indicated that such shares had been acquired on behalf of discretionary clients of Artisan Partners, persons other than Artisan Partners are entitled to receive all dividends from and proceeds from the sale of such shares and, to the knowledge of the Artisan Parties, none of such persons has an economic interest in more than five percent of the common stock.

(4)According to a Schedule 13G statement dated February 9, 2015 filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has sole voting power over 15,30111,552 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 924,4821,269,399 shares of common stock, shared voting power over 3,846 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 13,60114,604 shares of common stock.

(4)According to a Schedule 13G dated February 13, 2018 filed by Boston Partners, an investment adviser (“Boston Partners”), Boston Partners has sole voting power over 602,064 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 776,617 shares of common stock.

 

-11--23-


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The name, age, current position, date elected and prior business experience of each of Alleghany’s executive officers, or the “NamedNamed Executive Officers is as follows:

 

Name

 Age 

Current Position (date elected)

 

Prior Business Experience

Weston M. Hicks

 5861 President and chief executive officer
officer (since(since December
2004)
 Executive Vice President, Alleghany (October 2002 to December 2004).

Joseph P. Brandon

 5659 Executive Vice President
(since (since March 2012)
 

Consultant to Alleghany

(September (September 2011 to March 2012); private investor (May 2008 to August 2011); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Re Corporation, a property and casualty reinsurer and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (September 2001 to April 2008).

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 4750 Senior Vice President (since
January 2012), General
Counsel (since July 2009)
and Secretary (since January
2011)
 

Vice President, Alleghany (December 2004 to January 2012); Associate

General Counsel, Alleghany (March 2002 to July 2009) and; Assistant Secretary, Alleghany (March 2002 to January 2011).

Roger B. Gorham

 5255Consultant to Alleghany (since March 2018) Senior Vice President —
Head of Fixed Income and
Treasurer (since May 2013)

(May 2013 to March 2018)(1); Senior Vice President — Finance

and Investments and chief financial officer, Alleghany (January 2006 to May 2013); Senior Vice President — Finance—Finance and chief financial officer, Alleghany (May 2005 to January 2006); Senior Vice President — Finance,—Finance, Alleghany (December 2004 to May 2005).

John L. Sennott, Jr.

 4952 Senior Vice President
(since (since April 2013) and chief
financial officer (since May
2013)
 Consultant (April 2012 to April 2013); Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer (January 2010 to April 2012) and Chief Operating Officer (October 2008 to January 2010), Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, a property and casualty (re)insurer.

(1)Mr. Gorham retired from his positions as Senior Vice President — Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer of Alleghany effective March 1, 2018.

 

-12--24-


SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 2, 2015,1, 2018, the beneficial ownership of common stock of each of the nominees named for election as a director, each of the other current directors, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 and all nominees, directors and executive officers as a group.

 

      Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock
      Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Sole Voting
Power and/or  Sole
Investment Power
   Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
   Total  Percent
of Class
   Sole Voting
Power and/or Sole
Investment Power
  Shared Voting Power
and/or Shared
Investment Power
  Total Percent
of Class

Rex D. Adams

   7,411          7,411   (1)   *  

Stephen P. Bradley

   1,407          1,407   (1)   *  

Joseph P. Brandon

   12,123     9,955     22,078   (2)   *     1,000   23,829    24,829(1)  * 

Karen Brenner

   3,672          3,672   (1)   *     4,471        4,471(2)  * 

Ian H. Chippendale

   1,407          1,407   (1)   *     2,206        2,206(2)  * 

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   35     2,965     3,000   (3)   *     40   5,100    5,140(3)  * 

John G. Foos

   1,407     648     2,055   (1)(4)   *     2,206   648    2,854(2)(4)  * 

Roger B. Gorham

   7,150          7,150      *     7,517        7,517  * 

Weston M. Hicks

   46,751     18,919     65,670   (5)   *     46,777   18,919    65,696(5)  * 

Thomas S. Johnson

   9,865          9,865   (1)   *  

Jefferson W. Kirby

   91,874     396,859     488,733   (1)(6)   3.05     90,602   396,495    487,097(2)(6)  3.16 

William K. Lavin

   6,530          6,530   (1)   *     4,235        4,235(2)  * 

Phillip M. Martineau

   3,781          3,781   (1)   *     2,679   1,391    4,070(2)(7)  * 

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   2,269          2,269      *      —     5,084    5,084(8)  * 

Raymond L.M. Wong

   7,862     1,500     9,362   (1)(7)   *     9,586       9,586(2)(9)  * 

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

   203,544     430,846     634,390      3.95(8) 

All nominees, directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)

   171,319   451,466    622,785      4.0(10) 

 

*representsRepresents less than 1.0%.

 

(1)Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon. Includes 4,21723,829 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Adams, Johnsonheld jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and Lavin, 3,654investment power.

(2)Includes 2,560 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Kirby, 2,030 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Lavin and Mr. Wong, 1,510 shares of common stock in the case of Ms. Brenner, and1,000 shares of common stock in the case of Mr. Martineau and 500 shares of common stock in the case of Messrs. Bradley,Mr. Chippendale and Mr. Foos, issuable under stock options granted pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2015 Directors’ Plan”), the Amended and Restated 2010 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2010 Directors’ Plan”) and the 2005 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “2005 Directors’ Plan”).

 

(2)(3)Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Brandon.Dalrymple. Includes 9,925 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Brandon’s spouse, over which Mr. Brandon shares voting and investment power. Includes 30 shares of common stock held by Mr. Brandon’s children, over which Mr. Brandon shares investment power, and for which he disclaims beneficial ownership.

(3)Includes 2,9655,100 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Dalrymple’s spouse, over which Mr. Dalrymple shares voting and investment power.

 

(4)Includes 648 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Foos’Foos’s spouse, over which Mr. Foos shares voting and investment power.

 

(5)Includes 18,919 shares of common stock held by trusts over which Mr. Hicks has voting and investment control.

 

-25-


(6)

Includes 159,097 shares of common stock held by trusts of which Mr. Kirby isco-trustee and beneficiary and shares voting and investment power as to such shares; 27,586 shares as to which Mr. Kirby is sole trustee and beneficiary and over which Mr. Kirby has sole voting and investment power; and 237,015 shares held by the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary Trust. Mr. Kirby isco-trustee of the Fred M. Kirby II Residuary

-13-


Trust and shares voting and investment power as to such shares. Also includes 19 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s spouse, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power, 728power; and 364 shares held by Mr. Kirby’s children, over which Mr. Kirby shares voting and investment power, and 23 shares were held by a limited liability company with Mr. Kirby exercising sole voting and investment power in respect of such shares.power.

 

(7)Includes 6001,391 shares of common stock owned byheld jointly with Mr. Wong’s children,Martineau’s spouse, over which Mr. WongMartineau shares voting and investment power,power.

(8)Does not include any shares that may be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by Mr. Sennott. Includes 5,084 shares of common stock held jointly with Mr. Sennott’s spouse, over which Mr. Sennott shares voting and investment power.

(9)Includes 900 shares of common stock held by a trust ofover which Mr. Wong has voting and investment power, and 300 shares held by a limited liability company in which Mr. Wong has voting and investment power.

 

(8)(10)Based on the number of shares of outstanding common stock as of March 2, 2015,1, 2018, adjusted in the case of each director to include shares of common stock issuable within 60 days upon exercise of stock options held by such director.

 

-14--26-


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Alleghany has determined that, except as set forth below, no person who at any time during 20142017 was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” during 2014.2017. This determination is based solely upon Alleghany’s review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and written representations that no Form 5 was required, which such persons submitted to Alleghany during or with respect to 2014. Weston M. Hicks2017. Joseph Brandon filed a Form 4 on July 1, 2014September 6, 2017 reporting a transaction that occurred on March 31, 2014. John L. Sennott, Jr., Christopher K. Dalrymple and Jerry G. Borrelli each filed a Form 4 on February 27, 2014 reporting a transaction that occurred on January 15, 2014.

September 3, 2017.

 

-15--27-


EQUITYCOMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2014, relating to Alleghany’s equity compensation plans under which its equity securities are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category

 (a)
Number of  Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (c)
Number of  Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

  183,035(2)  $300.06(3)   527,189(4) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

            
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  183,035   $300.06    527,189  

(1)These equity compensation plans consist of: (i) the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (ii) the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (iii) the 2007 LTIP and (iv) the 2012 LTIP. The 2005 Directors’ Plan expired on December 31, 2009.

(2)This amount includes: (i)15,117 outstanding stock options issued to directors under the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (ii) 12,570 outstanding stock options issued to directors under the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (iii) 1,852 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2005 Directors’ Plan; (iv) 7,023 outstanding restricted stock units issued to directors under the 2010 Directors’ Plan; (v) 57,771 outstanding performance shares issued under the 2007 LTIP assuming payouts at maximum; (vi) 76,195 outstanding performance shares issued under the 2012 LTIP assuming payouts at maximum; (vii) 6,191 outstanding restricted stock units awarded under the 2012 LTIP and (viii) 6,316 outstanding restricted stock units awarded under the 2012 LTIP as a matching grant (the “Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units”). Restricted stock units granted to directors pursuant to the 2005 Directors’ Plan and 2010 Directors’ Plan (the “Director Restricted Stock Units”) are paid out in common stock, with one share of common stock being paid for each Director Restricted Stock Unit. Matching Grant Restricted Stock Units are paid out in cash and/or common stock, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, with one share of common stock or, if payment is made in cash, the market value of one share of common stock on the payment date, being paid for each Matching Grant Restricted Stock Unit. Performance shares outstanding under the 2007 LTIP and 2012 LTIP are paid, at the end of a four-year award period, in a maximum amount equal to one and one-half shares of common stock for each performance share, depending upon the level of performance achieved. Payments in respect of performance shares are made based upon the market value of common stock on the payment date. Recipients of performance shares are permitted to elect to receive payment for performance shares in cash and/or common stock, subject to certain limitations. Since there is no exercise price for restricted stock units or for performance shares, they are not taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

(3)The weighted-average exercise price is based upon the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding director stock options issued under the 2005 Directors’ Plan and the 2010 Directors’ Plan.

(4)This amount does not include: (i) 577,026 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan upon its termination on December 31, 2006; (ii) 188,227 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2007 LTIP upon its termination on April 27, 2012; or (iii) 27,485 shares of common stock that remained available for issuance under the 2005 Directors’ Plan upon its expiration on December 31, 2009, since no further awards of common stock may be made under any such plan.

-16-


PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees for Election

John G. Foos, William K. Lavin, Phillip M. Martineau and Raymond L.M. Wong have been nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 20152018 Annual Meeting, each to serve for a term of three years, subject to Alleghany’s director retirement policy, until the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board and was recommended to the Board for nomination by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong were last elected by stockholders at the 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 27, 2012.24, 2015.

Information about Voting

Proxies received from Alleghany stockholders of record will be voted for the election of the fourthree nominees named above as Alleghany directors unless such stockholders indicate otherwise. If any of the foregoing nominees is unable to serve for any reason, which is not anticipated, the shares represented by proxy may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of such proxy unless stockholders indicate otherwise. A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board if such nominee receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (see page 3)pages 10 and 11) do not count as votes cast “for” or “against” the nominee’s election, but will be counted as present at the meeting for quorum purposes.

Director Qualifications

The following information includes for each of the nominees named for election as director at the 20152018 Annual Meeting, and each of the other directors of Alleghany:

 

age,

age;

 

year first elected as a director of Alleghany,

Alleghany;

 

principal occupation and/or other business experience for the past five years,

years;

 

other public company directorships during the past five yearsyears; and

 

experience, qualifications, attributes and skills.

In addition to the information regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to the conclusion that each of the nominees named for election as director should be elected as a director of Alleghany, Alleghany believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has a reputation for integrity, honesty and for adherence to high ethical standards. Alleghany also believes that each of the nominees, and each of the other directors of Alleghany, has demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment to service to Alleghany and to the Board.

 

-17--28-


Nominees for Election

 

John G. FoosWilliam K. Lavin

Age 6573

Director since 20121992

MemberChairman of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

LOGO

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 1989 until his retirement in November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, and the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community. Mr. Foos served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Plan Investment Fund during the past five years and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012.

Mr. Foos’ qualifications to serve on the Board also include his extensive experience in and knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

William K. Lavin

Age 70

Director since 1992

Chairman of the Audit     Committee

Member of the

Compensation

    Committee

  

LOGO

LOGO
  

Mr. Lavin has been a financial consultant since October 1994, and currently serves as a director of Artisanal Brands, Inc., a specialty foods company.

 

Mr. Lavin’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience as an executive with public and private companies, his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for such companies and his financial literacy.

Phillip M. Martineau

Age 6770

Director since 2009

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Member of the

Nominating     and

Governance Committee

  

LOGOLOGO

  

Mr. Martineau was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Pittsburgh Corning Europe, building materials companies, from June 2005 until his retirement in May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Martineau was Chief Executive Officer and a director of High Voltage Engineering Corporation, or “High Voltage,” a designer and manufacturer of power control systems, from December 2004 until February 2005. The Board of Directors of High Voltage hired Mr. Martineau as Chief Executive Officer to lead High Voltage through a restructuring under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which resulted in its sale to Siemens in February 2005.

 

Mr. Martineau’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of executive operational experience with global companies in the materials and manufacturing sectors, particularly his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of such companies, as well as his experience as a directorserving on the boards of directors of other companies.

-18-


Raymond L.M. Wong

Age 6265

Director since 2006

Chairman of the Compensation     Committee

Member of the Audit     Committee

Member of the
Compensation
Committee

  LOGO

LOGO

  

Mr. Wong is currently a Managing Director of Spring Mountain Capital, LP, an investment management company which he joined in 2007. Prior to that, from 2002 until 2007, Mr. Wong was the Managing Member of DeFee Lee Pond Capital LLC, a financial advisory and private investment company. In addition, Mr. Wong is a director of American Power Groupseveral private companies, including Health Platforms, Inc. (Doctor.com), a healthcare marketing technology company, Hurel Corporation, a life sciences tool company, Oncoceutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, One Clipboard, Inc. (Splash), an energyevent marketing technology company, RiskSense, Inc., a cybersecurity company, and VALC Enterprises, Inc. (Home Captain), a financial technology company.

 

Mr. Wong’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his business experience, particularly his 25 years as a managing director in the investment banking group of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and his financial literacy.

-29-


Other Alleghany Directors

 

Rex D. Adams

Age 75

Director since 1999

Chairman of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Member of the Audit
Committee

Retiring effective at the 2015 Annual Meeting

LOGO

Mr. Adams has been a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Invesco Ltd., an investment management company, since April 2006, and a director of Invesco Ltd. since 2001. In addition, Mr. Adams has been Dean Emeritus at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University since December 2004.

Mr. Adams’ qualifications to serve on the Alleghany Board also include his business experience, including over 30 years as an executive of Mobil Corporation, his experience as a director on the boards of directors of other companies, particularly companies in the investment management industry, his financial literacy, his experience as the Dean and as a professor at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, and his experience in matters of corporate governance.

Stephen P. Bradley

Age 73

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Committee

Term expires in 2016

LOGO

Mr. Bradley is currently the William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at the Harvard Business School where he has been a professor since 1968. In addition, Mr. Bradley currently serves as a director of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation, a medical professional liability carrier. Mr. Bradley was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. prior to March 6, 2012 and also previously served as a director of CIENA Corp. and i2 Technologies, Inc.

Mr. Bradley’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his academic experience at the Harvard Business School relating to his work as a professor of competitive and corporate strategy and his considerable experience as a consultant and as a director of public companies.

-19-


Karen Brenner

Age 5962

Director since 2009

MemberChair of the Audit
Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Member of the
Nominating and
Governance Audit     Committee

Term expires in 20162019

  LOGO

LOGO

  

Ms. Brenner has been an Executive Director of Law and Business Initiatives at New York University since 2012 and Clinical Professor of Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University since 2008. She teaches professional responsibility in law and business, corporate governance in law and business and corporate transformation and leadership. Ms. Brenner also has been a principal at Brenner & Company, a financial management and advisory firm she founded, since 1998.

 

Ms. Brenner’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include her years of business experience as Chairman/Chief Executive Officer and/or board member of public and private companies in a wide variety of industries, and as an advisor to private equity firms, venture capital companies, boards of directors and chief executive officers focusing on enhancing value of operating companies,companies.

John G. Foos

Age 68

Director since 2012

Member of the Audit

    Committee

Member of the Nominating     and herGovernance Committee

Term expires in 2019

LOGO

Mr. Foos was Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, a health insurance company, from 1989 until his retirement in November 2008. In addition, Mr. Foos currently serves as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, a South Carolina-owned and operated health insurance carrier, the HAI Group Companies, a provider of niche insurance programs and services for the public and affordable housing community, and Emerald Shelter Group, anot-for-profit that provides healthcare and affordable housing. Mr. Foos served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Plan Investment Fund during the past five years and was a director of TransRe prior to March 6, 2012.

Mr. Foos’ qualifications to serve on the Board also include his extensive experience in corporate governance and management issues.knowledge of accounting and finance, which includes service as the Chief Financial Officer of Independence Blue Cross, in addition to his prior experience as a Partner with KPMG LLP and his financial literacy.

Ian H. Chippendale

Age 6669

Director since 2012

ChairmanMember of the
Compensation     Committee

Member of the Nominating

    and Governance Committee

Term expires in 20172020

  LOGO

LOGO

  

Mr. Chippendale is the retired Chairman (from September 2003 to December 2006) of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd., an insurance company. In addition, Mr. Chippendale has served as a director of HomeServe plc, an insurance company, sincefrom January 2007 through March 2015 and was a director of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.TransRe prior to March 6, 2012.

 

Mr. Chippendale’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his insurance industry knowledge and his international experience, including his service as the Chairman of RBS Insurance Group, Ltd.

-30-


 

Weston M. Hicks

Age 5861

Director since 2004

Term expires in 20172020

  

 

LOGOLOGO

  

 

Mr. Hicks has been Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer since December 2004. In addition, Mr. Hicks is a director of AllianceBernstein Corporation, an investment management and research company.

 

Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his years of experience as an executive in the insurance and financial services industry, particularly his experience as Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer during the past ten13 years, and his experience as an analyst of property and casualty insurance companies.

-20-


Thomas S. Johnson

Age 74

Director since 1997

    and for 1992-1993

Member of the Compensation

    Committee

Member of the

    Nominating and

    Governance Committee

Term expires in 2016

LOGO

Mr. Johnson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation and its subsidiary GreenPoint Bank from 1993 until his retirement on December 31, 2004. Mr. Johnson currently serves as a director of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and the Institute of International Education. Mr. Johnson served as a director of The Phoenix Companies, Inc., R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation during the past five years.

Mr. Johnson’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 30 years of experience as a financial services industry executive, particularly as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corporation, his experience as a member of the boards of directors of other companies and his financial literacy.

 

Jefferson W. Kirby

Age 5356

Director since 2006

Term expires in 20172020

  

 

LOGOLOGO

  

 

Mr. Kirby has been Chairman of the Board of Alleghany since July 2010. Mr. Kirby has been the Managing Member of Broadfield Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisory services company, since July 2003. Mr. Kirby was a director of Somerset Hills Bancorp, a bank holding company, from 2008 until May 2013.

 

Mr. Kirby’s qualifications to serve on the Board also include his over 25 years of experience in financial services and investment management, including his service as a Vice President of Alleghany from 1994 tountil June 2003 and as an investment manager.

 

-21--31-


Compensation of Directors

The information under this heading relates to the compensation during 20142017 of thosenon-employee directors who served on the Board at any time during 2014.2017. Employee directors are not separately compensated for their service on the Board.

20142017 Director Compensation

 

Name

  Fees
Earned or Paid
in Cash
   Stock
Awards(1)
   Total   Fees
Earned or Paid
in Cash
  Stock
Awards(1)
  Total

Rex D. Adams

  $102,000    $129,899    $231,899  

Stephen P. Bradley

   89,500     129,899     219,399  

Karen Brenner

   97,000     129,899     226,899     $112,000   $140,058   $252,058

Ian H. Chippendale

   87,500     129,899     217,399     101,000   140,058   241,058

John G. Foos

   93,500     129,899     223,399     107,000   140,058   247,058

Thomas S. Johnson

   92,000     129,899     221,899  

Jefferson W. Kirby

   140,000     129,899     269,899     150,000   140,058   290,058

William K. Lavin

   115,000     129,899     244,899     125,000   140,058   265,058

Phillip M. Martineau

   92,000     129,899     221,899     102,000   140,058   242,058

James F. Will(2)

   11,000          11,000  

Raymond L.M. Wong

   100,000     129,899     229,899     112,500   140,058   252,558

 

(1)Represents the grant date fair value of the award of 321228 shares of restricted common stock or 321228 restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) made to eachnon-employee director under the 20102015 Directors’ Plan on April 28, 2014,May 1, 2017, and computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, the number of shares or restricted stock units are calculated by dividing $140,000 by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. As of December 31, 2014,2017, each director held either 321228 shares of unvested restricted common stock or 321228 unvested restricted stock units.

(2)Mr. Will retired as a director in April 2014 and did not receive any awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units during 2014.

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

Following is information regarding fees earned and paid in cash to directors for service on the Board and its Committees:

 

  Board

  

•   Each independent director other than the ChairmanChair receives an annual retainer of $75,000.$85,000.

 

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual retainer of $140,000.$150,000.

 

  Audit Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $30,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $15,000.

 

  Compensation Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $15,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $10,000.

 

  Nominating and Governance Committee

  

•  The ChairmanChair receives an annual fee of $12,000.

 

•  Each other member receives an annual fee of $7,000.

 

-32-


Stock Awards

Pursuant to the 20102015 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who was elected,re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries receives, at the individual director’s election, either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $130,000$140,000 divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the

-22-


30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units, as the case may be, are subject to potential forfeiture until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant.

On April 28, 2014,May 1, 2017, each eligible director received either 321228 shares of restricted common stock or 321228 restricted stock units.units, reflecting such number of shares or restricted stock units equal to $140,000 divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Each director is permitted to defer payment of the restricted stock units, and all whole restricted stock units will be paid in the form of whole shares of common stock.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD SET FORTH IN THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. EACH NOMINEE SHALL BE ELECTED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF SUCH NOMINEE. A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST MEANS THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “FOR” A NOMINEE’S ELECTION MUST EXCEED THE NUMBER OF VOTES CAST “AGAINST” THE NOMINEE’S ELECTION. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKERNON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-23--33-


PROPOSAL 2. APPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

The 2010 Directors’ Plan, which provides for the annual grant to each non-employee director of Alleghany of either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $130,000 divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE, will expire on April 23, 2015. The Board believes it to be in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders to replace the 2010 Directors’ Plan with the 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan, or the “2015 Directors’ Plan,” which is substantially similar to the 2010 Directors’ Plan, in order to continue to attract and retain independent directors and to encourage them to increase and maintain their stock ownership in Alleghany consistent with the common stock ownership guidelines in order to promote long-term stockholder value. Accordingly, the Board has adopted the 2015 Directors’ Plan, effective upon stockholder approval.

Description of the 2015 Directors’ Plan

Pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, each year as of the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who was elected, re-elected or continues to serve as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of Alleghany or any of its subsidiaries will receive, at the individual director’s election, either a number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (each equivalent to one share of common stock) equal to $130,000 (or such higher amount determined by the Board from time to time) divided by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE. Such shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units, or the “Restricted Shares,” as the case may be, are subject to potential forfeiture until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant and are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the third anniversary of the date of grant. Non-employee individuals who are appointed to the Board between annual meetings of stockholders, or “Newly Appointed Directors,” will receive a pro-rated Restricted Share grant.

The 2015 Directors’ Plan will be administered by the Board. The Board has the authority, within the limits of the 2015 Directors’ Plan, to construe the 2015 Directors’ Plan, to determine all questions arising thereunder and to adopt and amend the rules and regulations for the administration of the 2015 Directors’ Plan as it may deem desirable. It is expected that the Compensation Committee will periodically review grant amounts and recommend any changes, as appropriate, to the Board. Following the 2015 Annual Meeting, Alleghany is expected to have nine non-employee directors who would be entitled to participate in the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

Shares of restricted common stock granted to a non-employee director pursuant to the 2015 Directors’ Plan shall be issued for no consideration, but shall be forfeited to Alleghany (without the payment of any consideration) if such non-employee director resigns from the Board prior to the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant. In addition, shares of restricted common stock may not be sold, assigned, pledged or transferred to any person until the third anniversary of the date of grant (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors), provided that such transfer restrictions shall no longer apply upon (i) a non-employee director’s death prior to the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant, (ii) a non-employee director’s ceasing to be a director for any reason after the first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant or (iii) a Change in Control (as defined in the 2015 Directors’ Plan).

In lieu of the issuance of shares of restricted common stock, a director may elect to receive restricted stock units, which are unfunded, bookkeeping units having a value equal to the value of shares of restricted common stock. In addition, restricted stock units are subject to the same terms and restrictions applicable to, shares of restricted common stock. At the time of payment, the then-current value of common stock multiplied by the number of whole restricted stock units (as adjusted for any dividends paid on the common stock) will be payable in the form of shares of common stock, and any fractional restricted stock unit shall be paid in cash. Non-employee directors are permitted to defer payment of restricted stock units to any time after the third anniversary of the date of grant until such non-employee director retires from the Board (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors).

-24-


A maximum of 60,000 shares of common stock may be issued to non-employee directors under the 2015 Directors’ Plan, subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2015 Directors’ Plan. Such shares of common stock may be original issue shares of common stock, treasury stock, shares of common stock purchased in the open market or otherwise. On March 2, 2015, the fair market value (as defined in the 2015 Directors’ Plan) of shares of common stock was $473.02 per share, or $28,381,200 in the aggregate for the 60,000 shares of common stock subject to the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

The Board, without the consent of any participant, may terminate or amend the 2015 Directors’ Plan at any time, including, without limitation, to increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock granted as Restricted Shares; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect any rights or obligations with respect to any awards theretofore made under the 2015 Directors’ Plan, and provided further, that no such amendment, without the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voted thereon in person or by proxy, shall increase the number of shares of common stock subject to the 2015 Directors’ Plan, extend the period during which awards may be granted or modify the requirements for eligibility to participate in the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

The 2015 Directors’ Plan will be effective upon stockholder approval thereof at the 2015 Annual Meeting. If the 2015 Directors’ Plan is approved, awards will be made, commencing in April 2015 and annually thereafter, on the first business day following an annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the 2015 Directors’ Plan (and on the first business day following the appointment of a Newly Appointed Director). The 2015 Directors’ Plan will terminate immediately preceding the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, unless sooner terminated by the Board in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Directors’ Plan. No awards may be granted under the 2015 Directors’ Plan after such termination, but such termination shall not affect the validity of any award granted prior to any such termination.

A copy of the 2015 Directors’ Plan is set forth inExhibit A to this proxy statement. The foregoing description is a summary of some, but not all, of the essential provisions of the 2015 Directors’ Plan, and is qualified by reference to the full text of the 2015 Directors’ Plan.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following description is a summary of the federal income tax treatment of awards under the 2015 Directors’ Plan; because the applicable tax rules are quite technical, the description is general in nature and does not purport to be complete.

Unless a recipient of shares of restricted common stock makes the election described below, the recipient will not recognize any income on the date that the shares of restricted common stock were received. Instead, the recipient generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted common stock on the date that the forfeiture restriction with respect to such shares lapses, and Alleghany will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount recognized by the recipient as ordinary income. The recipient’s basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent disposition of the shares of common stock will be the fair market value of the common stock on the date that the forfeiture restriction with respect to such shares lapsed, and any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as a capital gain or loss, short-term or long-term depending upon the recipient’s holding period for the shares of common stock.

If on or before December 31, a director elects to receive restricted stock units for the following year’s annual equity grant, such director will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of common stock (restricted stock units pay out in the form of shares of common stock) at the time the restricted stock units are paid. Under the 2015 Directors’ Plan, a director is permitted to elect to defer payment of restricted stock units to any time after the third anniversary of the date of grant or until the date that such director retires from the Board (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors). If a director does not specify a payment date when he or she elects to receive restricted stock units, the payment date will be the third

-25-


anniversary of the date of grant (with certain minor exceptions for Newly Appointed Directors). Restricted stock units are subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” which provides certain restrictions on the payment of deferred compensation and imposes penalties (e.g., a 20% penalty tax and interest penalty) on the recipient of the deferred compensation for failing to comply with such requirements.

A recipient may elect within 30 days after receipt of shares of restricted common stock to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares as of the date of receipt (and Alleghany will receive a corresponding deduction). In that case, the recipient will not recognize any income upon the vesting of such restricted common stock, the recipient’s basis in the shares of restricted common stock will be the fair market value of the shares of restricted common stock on the date that the shares were received, and any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as a capital gain or loss, short-term or long-term depending upon the recipient’s holding period for the shares of common stock. However, if the shares of restricted common stock are subsequently forfeited, the recipient will not be entitled to any tax deduction.

New Plan Benefits

The following table sets forth the number of Restricted Shares that will be granted to our non-employee directors under the 2015 Directors’ Plan on the first business day following the 2015 Annual Meeting, assuming that the 2015 Directors’ Plan is approved by our stockholders at such meeting, that each of the four current non-employee nominees for election as directors (Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong) are approved by our stockholders at such meeting and that each of our five continuing non-employee directors (Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale, Johnson and Kirby and Ms. Brenner) continue to serve as non-employee directors through the first business day following such meeting:

Name and Position

  Number of
Restricted
Shares/Units
  Dollar Value 

Non-Employee Director Group(1)

   (2)  $1,170,000(3) 

(1)Consists of nine persons, including the four current non-employee nominees for election as directors (Messrs. Foos, Lavin, Martineau and Wong) and the five continuing non-employee directors (Messrs. Bradley, Chippendale, Johnson and Kirby and Ms. Brenner).

(2)The number of shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units will be the quotient determined by dividing $130,000 by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported by the NYSE.

(3)Each non-employee director will receive a grant of shares of restricted common stock or, at his or her election, restricted stock units, having a value of $130,000 on the first business day following the 2015 Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE 2015 DIRECTORS’ PLAN. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF VOTES AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

-26-


PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE 2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

The Board believes it to be in the best interests of Alleghany and its stockholders to adopt at this time a new management incentive plan, replacing the 2010 MIP, in order to continue to reward, attract and retain highly qualified officers upon whom, in large measure, the sustained progress, growth and profitability of Alleghany depends. Accordingly, the Board adopted the 2015 Management Incentive Plan, or the “2015 Management Plan,” subject to stockholder approval. The 2015 Management Plan will permit (i) incentive compensation bonus awards to be structured to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, or the “Qualifying Incentives,” and (ii) incentive compensation bonus awards not intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, or the “Non-Qualifying Incentives.” In the event the 2015 Management Plan is not approved by stockholders of Alleghany, the Compensation Committee will consider the establishment of another annual or other incentive compensation plan.

Description of the 2015 Management Plan

The 2015 Management Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to select the officers (including officers who are directors) to participate in the 2015 Management Plan (after consideration of management’s recommendations), to establish the performance goals, to determine the amounts of incentive compensation bonus payable to any participant, and to determine whether such incentive compensation is intended to be a Qualifying Incentive or a Non-Qualifying Incentive.

Qualifying Incentives. Qualifying Incentives shall be payable to a participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of the calendar year or such other period, not to be less than six months, as is selected by the Compensation Committee, each a “Performance Period.” Prior to each Performance Period or at such later time as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee will establish a target or range of incentive compensation bonus opportunity for each participant based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may provide that a Qualifying Incentive shall be determined as an amount or percentage of a specified incentive pool based upon operating income, cash flow, earnings before income taxes, net income or other measures constituting a performance goal with such adjustments or exclusions as the Compensation Committee may determine; provided, however, that if payment of a Qualifying Incentive is based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals established by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee may determine the amount of the incentive pool by reference to any measure, whether or not constituting a performance goal, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

Performance goals may be based upon revenues; operating income; net operating income; cash flow; earnings before income taxes; net income; earnings per share; stockholders’ equity; return or net return on assets, net assets, investments, capital or equity; share price; share price appreciation; underwriting profits; gross or net premiums written; net premiums earned; compound growth in net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; loss ratio or combined ratio of Alleghany’s insurance businesses, operating efficiency or strategic business objectives consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets; business expansion goals; goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures; and productivity improvements, all whether applicable to Alleghany or any subsidiary or business unit or entity in which Alleghany has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate. A performance goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on, or otherwise employ, comparisons based on internal targets, the past performance of Alleghany or any subsidiary (or any business unit thereof) and/or the past or current performance of other companies or indexes, may provide for the inclusion, exclusion or averaging of specified items in whole or in part, including without limitation, catastrophe losses, realized gains or losses on strategic investments, acquisitions and divestitures, currency fluctuations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items whether of income or expense, accounting and tax changes, and any unusual or nonrecurring items, and, in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, shareholders’ equity and/or shares outstanding, assets or net assets. The Compensation Committee may provide a threshold level of performance below which no incentive compensation bonus will be paid as well as a maximum level of performance above which no additional incentive compensation bonus will be paid. It also may provide for the payment of differing amounts for different levels of performance.

-27-


As soon as practicable at the end of each Performance Period but before any incentive compensation bonuses are paid to the participants under the 2015 Management Plan, the Compensation Committee will certify in writing whether the performance goal(s) were attained and the amount of the incentive compensation bonus payable to each participant based on the attainment of such specified performance goals. The Compensation Committee may determine to grant a participant an incentive compensation bonus equal to, but not in excess of, the amount specified in such written certification. The Compensation Committee also may reduce or eliminate the amount of any incentive compensation bonus of any participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as the Compensation Committee shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain, specified personal goals established by the Compensation Committee. Under no circumstances, however, may the Compensation Committee increase the amount of the incentive compensation bonus otherwise payable to a participant beyond the amount originally established, waive the attainment of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee or otherwise exercise its discretion so as to cause any incentive compensation bonus not to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. The timing of payments to the participants under the 2015 Management Plan is designed to exempt the 2015 Management Plan from Section 409A of the Code.

Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Non-Qualifying Incentive may be awarded by the Compensation Committee to any participant (including covered employees) at any time before, during or following the completion of any Performance Period and may, but need not, be conditioned upon the achievement of any performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may increase, decrease or eliminate the amount of any Non-Qualifying Incentive awarded to any participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain or achieve, any performance goals or specified personal goals established by the Compensation Committee or management, and the Compensation Committee may waive the attainment of or modify the terms of any performance or personal goals established by the Compensation Committee or management or otherwise exercise its discretion in any manner with respect to any Non-Qualifying Incentive. Non-Qualifying Incentives may be payable to a participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of a Performance Period or as a result of the achievement of an individual objective or result, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. The grant or payment of a Non-Qualifying Incentive may not be made contingent on the failure of a participant to earn any Qualifying Incentive.

Anti-Dilution and Adjustments. To the extent that a performance goal is based on common stock (such as increases in earnings per share or other similar measures), a performance goal may be subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments in certain events specified in the 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

Other Terms. The 2015 Management Plan does not limit the authority of Alleghany to establish any other annual or other incentive compensation plan or to pay cash bonuses or other additional incentive compensation to employees of Alleghany, including to participants in the 2015 Management Plan. The maximum Qualifying Incentives, individually or in the aggregate, that could be payable to any participant in a single calendar year will not exceed $5.0 million. Incentive compensation bonuses paid pursuant to the 2015 Management Plan will be paid in cash. The Board, without the consent of any participant, may amend or terminate the 2015 Management Plan at any time. However, no amendment with respect to, or affecting, Qualifying Incentives that would require the approval of the stockholders pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code shall be effective without such approval.

A copy of the 2015 Management Plan is set forth inExhibit B to this proxy statement. The foregoing description is a summary of some, but not all, of the essential provisions of the 2015 Management Plan, and is qualified by reference to the full text of the 2015 Management Plan which is incorporated by reference herein.

New Plan Benefits

Any awards under the 2015 Management Plan will be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Therefore, it is not possible at present to determine the amount or form of any award that will be granted to any individual during the term of the 2015 Management Plan or that would have been granted during 2014 had the

-28-


2015 Management Plan been in effect. For information regarding awards made in 2014 to our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 12) pursuant to the 2010 MIP, which the 2015 Management Plan is intended to replace, see the Summary Compensation Table on page 52. For all current executive officers as a group, consisting only of the Named Executive Officers, the maximum aggregate amount of awards made under the 2010 MIP for 2014 was $5.5 million. For all employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group, the maximum aggregate amount of awards made under the 2010 MIP for 2014 was $6.8 million. Directors of Alleghany who are not officers of Alleghany are not eligible to receive awards under the 2010 MIP or under the 2015 Management Plan.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE 2015 MANAGEMENT PLAN. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF VOTES AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

-29-


PROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20152017

The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or “E&Y,” as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.2018. Although ratification by stockholders is not a prerequisite to the ability of the Audit Committee to select E&Y as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that such ratification is desirable. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.E&Y. The Audit Committee may, however, select E&Y notwithstanding the failure of stockholders to ratify its selection. Alleghany expects that representatives of E&Y will be present at the 20152018 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

20142017 and 20132016 Fees

The following table summarizes the fees billed for professional audit services rendered by E&Y for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2017 and 2016 and fees E&Y incurred for other services rendered to Alleghanyby E&Y for 20142017 and 2013.2016.

 

  2014   2013   2017   2016 

Audit Fees

  $3,809,500    $3,508,500    $5,633,920   $5,121,500 

Audit-Related Fees

   167,000     25,000     39,000    70,000 

Tax Fees

   122,345          142,500    110,000 

All Other Fees

                  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $4,098,845    $3,533,500    $5,815,420   $5,301,500 
  

 

   

 

 

The amounts shown for “Audit Fees” represent the aggregate fees for professional services E&Y rendered for the audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements for each of the last two fiscal years, the reviews of Alleghany’s financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q and the services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings during each of the last two fiscal years. “Audit Fees” also include fees for professional services E&Y rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The amounts shown for “Audit-Related Fees” represent the fees E&Y incurred forbilled in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services, including regulatory exams, that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Alleghany’s financial statements and that are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include consents and procedures for registration statements and responses to regulatory requests. The amounts shown for “Tax Fees” are forrepresent fees E&Y incurred with respect to tax compliance work related to its review of Alleghany’s federal income tax return, as well as the services performedprovided in conjunctionconnection with the tax compliance work related to Alleghany Capital’s acquisition of a foreign tax inspection for years 2011 and prior.majority interest in WWSC Holdings, LLC.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Audit and permissiblenon-audit services that Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm may provide to Alleghany must bepre-approved by the Audit Committee or, between meetings of the Audit Committee, by its Chairman pursuant to authority delegated to him by the Audit Committee. The Chairman reports allpre-approval decisions made by him at the next meeting of the Audit Committee, and he has undertaken to confer with the Audit Committee to the extent that any engagement for which hispre-approval is sought is expected to generate fees for the independent registered public accounting firm in excess of $100,000. When considering the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers, among other matters, whether the provision ofnon-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and permissiblenon-audit services rendered in 20142017 and 20132016 werepre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

-34-


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE. THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSAL IS A ROUTINE PROPOSAL ON WHICH A BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE IS GENERALLY EMPOWERED TO VOTE IN THE ABSENCE OF VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE BENEFICIAL OWNER, SO BROKERNON-VOTES

ARE UNLIKELY TO RESULT FROM THIS PROPOSAL.

 

-30--35-


Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently composed of the sixfour independent directors whose names appear at the end of this report. Management is responsible for Alleghany’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Alleghany’s annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes and the activities of Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee members are not acting as professional accountants or auditors, and their responsibilities are not intended to duplicate or certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm or to certify the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm under applicable rules.

For fiscal 2014,2017, Ernst & Young LLP acted as Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm. In this context, the Audit Committee has met to review and discuss Alleghany’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20142017 and for the fiscal year then ended, including Alleghany’s specific disclosure under management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and critical accounting estimates, with management and Ernst & Young LLP, Alleghany’s independent registered public accounting firm.LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board, or the “PCAOB.” Ernst & Young LLP reported to the Audit Committee regarding the critical accounting estimates and practices and the estimates and assumptions used by management in the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20142017 and for the fiscal year then ended, all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management, the ramifications of use of such alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by Ernst & Young LLP.

Ernst & Young LLP provided a report to the Audit Committee describing Ernst & Young LLP’s internal quality-control procedures and related matters. Ernst & Young LLP also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence. When considering Ernst Young LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee considered, among other matters, whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision ofnon-audit services to Alleghany is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. All audit and permissiblenon-audit services in 20142017 and 20132016 werepre-approved pursuant to these procedures.

Based on the reviews and discussions with management and Ernst & Young LLP referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20142017 and for the fiscal year then ended be included in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for such fiscal year.

William K. Lavin

Rex D. Adams

Stephen P. Bradley

Karen Brenner

John G. Foos

Raymond L.M. Wong

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

 

-31--36-


PROPOSAL 5.3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the 20142017 compensation we paid to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52,58, also referred to as our “Named Executive Officers.” For 2014,2017, Weston M. Hicks, Joseph P. Brandon, Christopher K. Dalrymple, Roger B. Gorham and John L. Sennott, Jr. were our Named Executive Officers.

Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 3440 of this proxy statementProxy Statement as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes and narrative appearing on pages 3458 through 6671 of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2014.2017.

For a discussion of the results of past advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the Compensation Committee’s response to such results, including its determination to restore the concept of targetsee “Compensation Discussion and maximum opportunities to 2015 annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP, see “AdvisoryAnalysis —Compensation Committee Process — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on pages 4147 and 42.48.

The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that Alleghany’s 20142017 executive compensation program was designed appropriately and ensured that management’s interests were aligned with the interests of Alleghany stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote in favor of the following advisory resolution at the 20152018 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Alleghany’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission RegulationS-K in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative set forth in the proxy statement for Alleghany’s 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Although this advisory vote, commonly referred to as “say on pay,“say-on-pay, is not binding on Alleghany, the Compensation Committee or the Board, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions about our executive compensation program.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A CONTRARY VOTE. THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THIS PROPOSAL. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKERNON-VOTES WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE RESULTS OF THIS VOTE.

 

-32--37-


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has met to review and discuss with Alleghany’s management the specific disclosure contained under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 34.40. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such disclosure, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statementProxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Alleghany’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

Raymond L.M. Wong

Ian H. Chippendale

Thomas S. Johnson

William K. Lavin

Phillip M. Martineau

Raymond L.M. Wong

Compensation Committeeof the Board of Directors

 

-33--38-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

40

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

40

2017 Compensation Program Summary

42

Alleghany Performance in 2017

43

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

43

Compensation Committee Process

46

Compensation Determination Timetable

46

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

46

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

47

Elements of 2017 Compensation

48

Salary

49

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

49

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation

53

Performance Shares

53

Restricted Stock Units

54

Perquisites

55

Deferred Compensation Plan

55

Retirement Plan

55

Financial Statement Restatements

55

Hedging and Pledging Policies

55

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

55

Tax Considerations

56

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

57

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

58

Summary Compensation Table

58

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017

60

Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

61

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 FiscalYear-End

64

2017 Stock Vested

65

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

65

Pension Benefits

67

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

69

CEO Pay Ratio

71

-39-


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our corporatefinancial objective in the current economic environment is to create stockholder value through owning and managing operating subsidiaries and investments, anchored by a core position in property and casualty reinsurance and insurance. Our executive compensation program is intended to provide competitive total compensation to our Named Executive Officers that is aligned with the interests of our stockholders in increasinggrow our common stockholders’ equity per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks. This approach enables us to manage risk to avoid loss of capital during periods of economic turmoil, which we believe creates maximum value for stockholders in the long term, even if it results in lower levels of capital appreciation during periods when economic conditions are more favorable.

The foundation of ourOur executive compensation program restsis designed to provide compensation to our Named Executive Officers that is aligned with this financial objective. Our aim is to provide reasonable amounts of compensation, weighted towards long-term incentive awards primarily based on performance that are capped with a reasonable upside to discourage imprudent risk taking or misaligned incentives.

For 2017, this compensation philosophy was evidenced by the following principlescompensation highlights:

Annual incentive plan awards included a financial objective but also discretion given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, with the discretionary aspect being restricted by the fact that wepayouts for 2017 were limited to the lesser of (i) approximately $6.2 million (representing the maximum potential payout for our Named Executive Officers as a group) or (ii) 3% of 2017 annual adjustedpre-tax earnings.

Long-term performance share awards were subject to goals believed to be challenging to meet in today’s low interest rate and volatile market environment and that are aligned with our corporate financial objective of long-term growth in book value, with no payout being made if threshold performance is not achieved, and with our CEO’s long-term incentives based 100% on performance.

We believe the following practices further align our compensation program with the interests of our stockholders:stockholders’ interests:

 

What We Do

Performance-Based Compensation
Elements are Significant

•    In 2014, approximately 85% of Mr. Hicks’ direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation and savings benefit), and at least 50% of the direct compensation for each of our other Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Gorham (at approximately 40%) depended upon our financial performance.

•    All of Mr. Hicks’ long-term incentive compensation is directly tied to our financial performance and subject to forfeiture if threshold performance is not achieved.

Our Incentive Awards are “Capped”

  

•   Individual awards under our shortshort- and long-term incentive plans are “capped” at reasonable amounts150% of target and performance goals are set at realistic levels high enough to eliminate the potential for unintended windfalls andencourage strong performance but still reasonably attainable to avoid encouraging the use of excessive financial leverage andor taking of imprudent risks.

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

  

•   We require our officers to own a substantial amount of our common stock, including five times base salary for Mr. Hicks, to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success. In addition, our Named Executive Officers have significant exposure to Alleghany through unvested performance shares and, for some of our Named Executive Officers, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

We canCan “Claw Back” Compensation

  

•   We have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking.

 

-34--40-


What We Do
(continued)

We Limit Perquisites to Insignificant Amounts

  

•   Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2014,2017, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Independent Compensation Consultant

  

•   The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to Alleghany.

What We Don’t Do

No Stock Options

  

•   We do not grant stock options.

No Accelerated Vesting of Performance
Shares upon Termination or aChange-in-Control

  

•   Performance share and restricted stock awards under long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by Alleghany, other than on apro-rated basis for performance shares based on Alleghany performance throughyear-end immediately preceding the date of termination in the event of a termination without cause.

 

•   Awards under our shortshort- and long-term incentive plans do not provide for accelerated vesting upon achange-in-control.

No Hedging or Pledging of Stock

  

•   We have in place a policy applicable to our Named Executive Officers that prohibits them from hedging or pledging Alleghany securities they hold.

-41-


20142017 Compensation Program Component Summary

The primary components of our 20142017 total direct compensation program(salary, annual incentive and long-term equity based awards) for our Named Executive Officers areis summarized below.

 

Annual
Compensation
Component
  Key FeaturesFeatures/Purpose  

Dollar Amounts

Involved

Salary

  Fixed annual cash amount.

Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation upon which our Named Executive Officers can rely.compensation.

The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations.

  2014 salaries for our Named Executive Officers as a group totaled $3.6 million.

LOGO

Annual Cash Incentives

  

The Compensation Committee establishes annual incentive award opportunities asProvides a percentagepay-for-performance component for achievement of base salary for Named Executive Officers.shorter-term objectives, with individual awards “capped” at approximately 150% of target.

 

The Compensation Committee determines individual results for

Provides pay-for-performance component for achievement of shorter-term objectives.The maximum amount of annual incentive awards payable to our Named Executive Officers as a group for 2014 was approximately $5.5 million.

-35-


Annual Compensation
Component
Key FeaturesPurpose

Dollar Amounts

Involved

participants and payouts based on overall financial and operational performance of management.

  

LOGO

Long-Term Equity

  -BasedEquity-Based Incentives

  Grant of performance shares having a value at the date of grant equal to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each Named Executive Officer.

Performance shares granted for the award period beginning on January 1, 2014 will be paid out on the basis of performance over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2017, based on the average annual compound growth in Alleghany’s book value per share.

Shares: Providespay-for-performance component focused on achievement of longer-term financial objective of increasing book value per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and without taking imprudent risks.Performance Individual performance share awards are “capped” at 150% of target.

Awards made in January 2017 pay out to participants based on the average annual compound growth in our Named Executive Officers as a group in 2014 had a grantbook value per share from the award date fair valuethroughyear-end 2020, with growth at 7% paying out at target, growth at 9% paying out at maximum and growth below 5% paying zero.

Restricted Stock Units:Grants of approximately $7.8 million.

Grant of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units to certain officers, havingour chief financial officer and General Counsel provide a value atretention element of total compensation and incent the date of grant equalprudence we desire them to a percentage of base salary, which percentage is individually determined by the Compensation Committee for each such officer. have in their respective roles.

The value of such awards depends on the market price of our common stock and thestock. The awards cliff-vest four years from date of grant.

  Provides a retention element of total compensation.Awards of restricted stock to certain of our Named Executive Officers had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.6 million in 2014.

LOGO

  

Total 20142017 Salary, Annual Cash Incentive and LTIP Award Amount

= $17.5$17.9 million

 

-36--42-


In addition to the salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives described above, our Named Executive Officers receive an annual savings benefit under Alleghany’s deferred compensation plan, or the “Deferred Compensation Plan,” in an amount equal to 15% of base salary. Our Named Executive Officers who have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany are eligible to receive a benefit (fifteen years of service is required in order to receiveunder the full benefit) under a retirement plan.Retirement Plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the retirement planRetirement Plan was closed to new participants, and no additional benefits for existing participants have accrued after such date.

Alleghany Performance in 20142017

A summary of some highlights of Alleghany’s results in 2014 follows:

 

Alleghany’sAchieved a 7.4% increase in common stockholders’ equity per share to $553.20 at 2017year-end 2014 was $465.51, an increase from $515.24 at 2016year-end despite incurring $511 million ofafter-tax net catastrophe losses representing 6.0% of 12.7% from common stockholders’ equity per shareAlleghany’s capital at the beginning of $412.96 at year-end 2013. Strong underwriting results, primarily at wholly-owned subsidiaries Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., or “TransRe,” and RSUI Group, Inc., or “RSUI,” appreciation2017, in Alleghany’s investment portfolio and accretive repurchasesa year when the industry is estimated to have incurred over $130 billion of common stock all contributed to double-digit growth in common stockholders’ equity per share.

worldwide catastrophe losses.

 

Net earnings were $679.2of $90 million in 2014,2017, compared with $628.4$457 million in 2013, representing a 9.4% return on equity for both years.

2016, primarily reflecting the significant catastrophe losses in 2017.

 

TransRe and RSUI produced double-digit returnsA consolidated netpre-tax underwriting lossof $316 million on equity. TransRe’s growth in stockholder’s equity (adjusted for capital contributions and dividends) was 14.4%, while RSUI’s growth in stockholder’s equity (adjusted for dividends) was 13.4%,almost $5.0 billion of net premiums earned, which we believe are strong growth rates ingenerated a low inflation/deflationary environment.

Alleghany reported a consolidated underwriting profit in 2014 of $494.8 million, compared with $420.7 million in 2013, and a consolidated combined ratio of 88.8% in 2014, compared with 90.1% in 2013, reflecting excellent106.4%. The underwriting results at TransReloss included $818 million of current yearpre-tax catastrophe losses, which added 16.5 points to the combined ratio and RSUI.

an estimated $265 million of favorable loss reserve development, which reduced the combined ratio by 5.3 points.

 

Alleghany’s wholly-owned subsidiaries CapSpecialty, Inc., or “CapSpecialty,”equity and fixed income portfolios significantly outperformed their investment benchmarks.

Sold Pacific Compensation Corporation or “PacificComp,” made significant progressto CopperPoint Mutual Insurance Company in reducing underwriting losses, while improving their capabilities and competitive positioning.

December 2017.

 

Continued to build Alleghany made progress in building its wholly-owned subsidiary Alleghany Capital Corporation’s portfolio of non-financialCapital’s manufacturing and service businesses, including Jazwares,acquiring a majority interest in WWSC Holdings, LLC, Bourn & Koch,a structural steel fabricator and erector, and a minority interest in Wilbert Funeral Services, Inc., R.C. Tway Company, LLC, Stranded Oil Resources Corporation Alleghany Capital’s manufacturing and ORX Exploration, Inc.

The above positives were partially outweighed by performanceservice businesses had operating earnings before taxes of Alleghany’s equity portfolio which returned 5.6%$66 million in 2014, reflecting weak returns on consumer discretionary, energy and industrial holdings that more than offset strong returns2017, compared with $43 million in technology and health care holdings.

2016.

Additional information regarding Alleghany’s 20142017 results, including audited consolidated financial statements, as well as MD&A with respect to 20142017 results, is contained in Alleghany’s Annual Report onthe Form10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2014, or the “Form 10-K,” which was filed with the SEC on February 24, 2015.22, 2018. Readers are urged to review the Form10-K for a more complete discussion of Alleghany’s financial performance.

Alleghany Long-Term Performance

We believe that Alleghany’s performance is best measured over the long term. 2014 marked Mr. Hicks’ tenthterm, and that long-term growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is the best metric for evaluating such performance. In this regard, the table below shows the annual, and three- andten- year as Alleghany’s President and chief executive officer. Over thataverage rolling, annualized growth in our common stockholders’ equity per share during the five year period from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017:

   Common
Stockholders’
Equity
Per Share
  Annual
Return
 

 

Rolling Annualized Average

Year

     Three-Year Ten-Year

2012

    379.13    10.8   8.7   8.8

2013

    412.96    8.9   8.3   8.5

2014

    465.51    12.7   10.8   8.6

2015

    486.02    4.4   8.6   8.6

2016

    515.24    6.0   7.7   7.8

2017

    553.20    7.4   5.9   7.0

Average

       8.4%   8.3%   8.2%

-43-


As can be seen in the table above, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share generally has compounded annually at approximately 9%, atover the upper endvarious time metrics in themid-range of Alleghany’s stated strategic objective of7-10% annual growth in common stockholders’ equity per share over the long term. This period included a major financial crisis, when a number of financial institutions suffered a permanent capital loss, as well as a number of significant natural catastrophes that challenged Alleghany’s insurance and reinsurance businesses.share.

-37-


The chart below summarizes Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share growth and stock price performance over theten-year period from December 31, 20042007 to December 31, 2014,2017, compared with the S&P 500, with all values indexed to December 31, 2004.2007. During thisten-year period, Alleghany’s common stockholders’ equity per share increased at a compound annual rate of 8.7%7.0%, compared with a compound annual rate of return of 7.7%8.5% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, or the “SS&P 500, and the price of Alleghany common stock (adjusted for stock dividends) appreciated at a 6.4%4.8% compound annual rate of return. Alleghany’s stock price performance lagged the growth in stockholders’ equity per share because the price of Alleghany common stock was 132% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2007, compared with 108% on December 31, 2017.

 

LOGO

LOGO

As indicated by the data presented in the tablechart above, Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has been relatively consistent. The trading price of Alleghany’s common stock has been more volatile, reflecting the volatility of the stock market in general. In Alleghany’s view, the relatively steady increase in growth in common stockholders’ equity per share is a better measure of fundamental performance and value creation as compared withto the more volatile trading price of Alleghany’s common stock, supports Alleghany’s determination to focusstock. As such Alleghany focuses its executive compensation incentive program on building stockholders’ equity over time. In terms of Alleghany’s overall performance over the past decade, the data presented in the table above indicates that Alleghany’s growth in common stockholders’ equity per share has exceeded the S&P 500 return in eight of the last ten years, and the increase in Alleghany’s stock price has exceeded the S&P 500 return in five of the last ten years.

over time.

 

-38--44-


During this same theten-year performance period set out in the graph on page 44, we believe that Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s compensation has been well-aligned with Alleghany’s long-term performance as can be seen in the table below.

10-year Pay-TSR(1) Alignment

10 Year Pay-TSR Alignment

($ in thousands)

LOGO

 

Year

 2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  5 Year
CAGR

2009 -
2014
(%)
  10 Year
CAGR

2004  -
2014
(%)
 

CEO Total Compensation(1)

 $10,676(2)  $3,781   $4,566   $6,522   $6,435   $6,206   $5,636   $7,347   $7,332   $6,216   $10,543    

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

 $850   $850   $856   $1,160   $1,594   $1,066   $822   $1,922   $1,259   $(1,232 $2,914    

CEO Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

 $9,826   $2,931   $3,710   $5,361   $4,840   $5,140   $4,814   $5,425   $6,072   $7,448   $7,629    8  (2%) 

Indexed TSR(4)

  100    102    133    150    107    107    121    115    135    161    187    12  6

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excluding pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  4%   9% 

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100    104    120    138    131    144    159    168    186    202    228    10  9

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excluding pension) Increases / Decreases

  

  1%   11% 

LOGO

  Year  CAGR 
  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  1 Year  3 Year  10 Year(4) 

CEO Total Compensation(2)

  6,522   6,435   6,206   5,636   7,347   7,332   6,216   10,543   6,869   8,573   9,647   12.5  (2.9%)   4.0

Pension Value Increase/(Decrease)

  1,160   1,594   1,066   822   1,922   1,259   (1,232  2,914   (23  946   1,844    

CEO SCT Compensation Excluding Pension(3)

  5,361   4,840   5,140   4,814   5,425   6,072   7,448   7,629   6,892   7,627   7,803   2.3  0.7  3.8

Indexed TSR

  100   72   71   81   77   90   108   125   129   164   161   (2.0%)   8.7  4.8

TSR vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  (4.2)%   8.0  1.0

Indexed BVPS Growth

  100   95   105   116   122   135   147   165   173   183   197   7.4  5.9  7.0

BVPS vs. CEO Compensation (excl. pension) Increases / (Decreases)

 

  5.1  5.2  3.2

 

(1)Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013, which includes a negative amount for the change in value of Mr. Hicks’ pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” for purposes of calculating total compensation contained in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52.

(2)Includes a special, one-time award of 29,877 (adjusted for subsequent stock dividends) performance-based restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Hicks upon his election as chief executive officer of Alleghany. This award vested on December 31, 2012.

(3)Excludes annual change in pension value. Change in actuarial present value of pension benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 56 and 57 to be useful for an understanding of change in pension benefit values.

(4)Total Shareholder Return reflects Alleghany share price appreciation including the impact of stock dividends.

(2)Includes annual fluctuation in pension value. Calculated according to SEC rules except for 2013 and 2015, which include a negative value for Mr. Hicks’s pension benefit. SEC rules require that negative pension value changes are reflected as a “zero” in table.

(3)Represents CEO compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 58, excluding annual fluctuation in pension value.

(4)Total Shareholder Return for this period reflects that the price of Alleghany’s common stock was 132% of stockholders’ equity per share on December 31, 2007, compared with 108% on December 31, 2017.

 

-39--45-


Compensation Committee Process

Compensation Determination Timetable

General Setting of Salary and Incentive Awards

Salary adjustments for the coming year and new incentive awards are generally made annually by the Compensation Committee at ain January. At its January 2017 meeting, in January, and the Compensation Committee determined 20142017 salaries, 20142017 annual incentive awardsaward opportunities and 2014-20172017-2020 long-term incentive awards for all of the Named Executive Officers at its January 2014 meeting. ThatOfficers. This meeting commenced immediately followingfollowed the January 20142017 Board meeting, of the Board, at which the Board reviewed and discussed:

 

an evaluation of preliminary 20132016 financial results for Alleghany;

 

an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2013Hicks’s 2016 performance and priorities for 2014;

2017;

 

a report by Mr. Hicks on management succession and development throughout Alleghany;

 

the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of each Named Executive OfficerOfficer; and

 

Alleghany’s projections and plan for 20142017 through 2016.

2019.

Setting of Mr. Hicks’ 2014Hicks’s 2017 Compensation

In determining Mr. Hicks’ 2014Hicks’s 2017 compensation, the Compensation Committee at its January 20142017 meeting reviewed Mr. Hicks’ 2013Hicks’s 2016 performance and 20142017 priorities, as described above, as well as all components of Mr. Hicks’ 2013Hicks’s 2016 compensation, including annual salary, annual cash incentive compensation in respect of 2013,2016, outstanding performance share awards, values of previous awards of restricted stock and benefits under Alleghany’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Alleghany’s medical, long-term disability and other employee welfare plans and the freezing of Alleghany’sthe Retirement Plan atyear-end 2013. After this review and the Compensation Committee’s consideration of input from its compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc., or “FW Cook,” the Committee determined to increase Mr. Hicks’s 2017 target annual incentive opportunity to 190% from 170% of salary and target long-term incentive opportunity for the 2017-2020 award period to 450% from 400% of salary. These increases in target opportunities reflect the Compensation Committee’s consideration of internal comparability factors, its assessment of Mr. Hicks’s superior performance over a long-term period, very positive 2016 results for Alleghany and its stockholders, the absence of any increase in Mr. Hicks’s compensation since 2014 and its emphasis on tying increases in Mr. Hicks’s compensation to performance-based components.

Payouts of Awards in Respect of 20142017 Performance

The Compensation Committee generally determines the payout of awards for prior performance periods at a meeting in late February, upon the completion of theyear-end audit of prior year financial statements. With respect to 2014,2017, the Compensation Committee determined payouts to the Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Hicks, of 20142017 annual incentive awards and 2011-20142014-2017 long-term incentive awards at its February 201521, 2018 meeting. Payout determinations were based on Board and Compensation Committee discussions and determinations regarding Alleghany’s financial performance for 20142017 and applicable award periods, an evaluation of Mr. Hicks’ 2014Hicks’s 2017 performance, and the recommendation of Mr. Hicks regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Committee Advisors and Services

The Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W.FW Cook & Co., Inc., or “FW Cook,” as a compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the

-46-


competitiveness of Alleghany executive compensation, executive compensation program design matters, market trends and technical considerations. Prior to its determination to retain FW Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the independence of FW Cook as a firm and the individuals providing advice to the Compensation Committee in compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards. The Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook as a firm and the relevant individual advisers were independent.

The nature and scope of services that FW Cook provides to the Compensation Committee include the following: competitive market compensation analyses; assistance with the redesign of any director or management compensation or benefit

-40-


programs as necessary or requested; assistance with respect to analyzing the impact of regulatory and/or accounting developments on our compensation plans and programs; and preparation for and attendance at selected Compensation Committee meetings. FW Cook is also available to advise the Compensation Committee and management on various executive compensation matters involving our operating subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all services provided by FW Cook and fees to be paid by Alleghany to FW Cook.

In evaluating our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has been advised by FW Cook as to the compensation levels of other companies that might compete with us for executive talent. Competitive market data have been periodically developed by FW Cook from several different sources, including proxy statements. WeAlthough we do not seek to set our executive compensation toprimarily based on any benchmarks or peer group, but usewe believe that information regarding pay practices at other companies is nevertheless useful in two respects. First, we recognize that our compensation practices must be competitive in the competitivemarketplace. Second, independent marketplace information is one of the many factors that we consider in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. In this regard, in considering compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considers comparative market data periodically requested from FW Cook. FW Cook last prepared this analysis in November 2017 and FW Cook’s peer group companies were:

Arch Capital

Everest Re GroupRenaissanceRe

Axis Capital Holdings

Markel CorporationValidus

Cincinnati Financial

Old Republic InternationalWhite Mountains

CNA Financial

Progressive CorporationW.R. Berkley

Erie Indemnity

Reinsurance Group of AmericaXL Group

This peer group was selected based on publicly traded companies that generally as a group (i) approximate our scope of business and that of our subsidiaries, including revenue and market capitalization, (ii) are similar to provide insightsus in the importance to their business of capital allocation, investments and risk management, (iii) compete with us for a comparable pool of talent, and (iv) reflect our global presence. The peer companies were the same ones used by FW Cook in November 2016, with the exception of Chubb Corporation which entered into a strategic transaction in 2017.

Additionally, our compensation levels, mix and strategies. Our senior officers have all been recruitedmid-career, and our compensation must be reasonably competitive with that of their former employers. However, we do not seek to compete for executive talent solely on the basis of compensation. Rather, weWe also compete by offering a unique professional opportunity to work in a high integrity environment where the focus is on building long-term stockholder value.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Consistent with the Board’s recommendation and thenon-binding stockholder vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Alleghany holds a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as “say on pay,“say-on-pay, every year. At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2014, approximately 84% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our “say on pay” proposal. However, the favorable percentage vote for our 2014 “say on pay” proposal was lower than the prior year when it was 99%. The Compensation Committee believes this decrease in favorable votes was due to criticism made by one of the major proxy advisory services of certain aspects of our executive compensation program and such proxy advisory service’s recommendation to vote against our 2014 “say on pay” proposal.

The Compensation Committee monitors the results of Alleghany’s “say on pay”“say-on-pay” proposal and related stockholder feedback when evaluating the effectiveness of Alleghany’s compensation policies and disclosures, particularly in the event of a negative vote or significant change in the percentage of favorable votes with regard to such proposal. AsAlleghany also actively engages with its significant

-47-


stockholders to gauge their opinions on a resultrange of topics, including executive compensation. We view this as an important opportunity to develop broader relationships with key investors over the lower favorable votelong term and to engage in 2014, the Chairmanopen dialogue on compensation and governance related issues.

At our Annual Meeting of the Board and ChairmanStockholders in April 2017, we received strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 97% stockholder approval of oursay-on-pay proposal. When setting compensation for 2018, the Compensation Committee considered both the level of voting support from our stockholders on oursay-on-pay vote, as well as members of management, engaged in discussions with many of Alleghany’s largest stockholders (holding instockholder feedback when evaluating our executive compensation plans and determined that no material changes to the aggregate approximately 58% of Alleghany’s outstanding common stock) about Alleghany’s executive compensation program.program were warranted. The purposeCompensation Committee will continue to review the design of this outreach was to explainthe executive compensation program in more detail the Compensation Committee’s approach tolight of future“say-on-pay” votes, developments in executive compensation, and rationale for its decisions, as well as hear any concerns from our stockholders in this regard. During these discussions, stockholders provided feedback on a variety of topics. With respectAlleghany’spay-for-performance philosophy to compensation matters, stockholders notedensure that they were generally pleased with Alleghany’s financial performance, as well as the leadership of our Chairman and President and chief executive officer and other Alleghany management, and they were generally supportive of many aspects of our executive compensation program. However, some stockholders noted that they would likeprogram continues to better understand the structure of our annual incentive awards and would like to see more disclosure regarding the performance metrics and mechanics with respect to such awards made under the 2010 MIP.

In response to the above stockholder discussions, during the second half of 2014, the Compensation Committee reviewed the structure of annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP and, in consultation with FW Cook, considered possible revisions. In this regard, the Compensation Committee discussed, among other things, the rationales underlying the various alternatives, the mechanics and process involved in either changing the form of compensation under the 2010 MIP or eliminating annual incentive awards, the benefits and costs of the various alternatives, alignment of the various alternatives withserve the best interests of Alleghany and its long-term stockholders, and the possibility and desirabilitystockholders.

Elements of revising awards under the 2010 MIP so as to include threshold, target and maximum opportunities.

-41-


After deliberation, the2017 Compensation Committee determined that it would restore the concept of target and maximum opportunities to 2015 annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP. With respect to such 2015 annual incentive awards, target opportunities were reduced from 2014 target opportunities (as described on page 44), and as a percentage of salary and dollar amount are as follows:

    2015 Salary   

Target

Opportunity %

   

Target

Opportunity $

 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     170    $1,700,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     135     1,080,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     65     409,500  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     30     180,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     65     409,500  
      

 

 

 

Total 2015 Target Annual Incentive Opportunities

  $3,779,000  
    

 

 

 

Maximum incentive opportunities for 2015 annual incentive awards are 150% of target awards and as a percentage of salary and dollar amount are as follows:

    2015 Salary   

Maximum

Opportunity %

   

Maximum

Opportunity $

 

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     255    $2,550,000  

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     203     1,620,000  

Mr. Dalrymple

   630,000     98     614,250  

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     43     270,000  

Mr. Sennott

   630,000     98     614,250  
      

 

 

 

Total 2015 Maximum Annual Incentive Opportunities

  

  $5,668,500  
      

 

 

 

Otherwise, the Committee determined that, as so revised, the existing structure was the most appropriate structure for annual incentive awards in light of Alleghany’s strategic objectives, the nature of Alleghany’s businesses, the overall alignment of management incentive compensation and stockholders’ interests and the current environment. As a result, for annual incentive awards made in January 2015 to the Named Executive Officers for 2015 performance, provisions for target and maximum opportunities were made but no other material changes were made.

The Compensation Committee believes that it has listened carefully to Alleghany’s stockholders regarding Alleghany’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee believes that Alleghany’s compensation practices result in an executive compensation program that best serves Alleghany and its long-term stockholders. The Compensation Committee intends to review the outcome of the 2015 “say on pay” proposal and future “say on pay” proposals on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as one of the relevant factors in structuring Alleghany’s executive compensation program.

Components of 2014 Compensation

The principal componentselements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in respect of 20142017 consisted of:

 

salaries;

 

annual cash incentive compensation under the 2010 MIP;

compensation;

 

annual grants of long-term equity-based incentives under the 2012 LTIPincentives; and

 

an annual savings benefit equal to 15% of base salary.

-42-


The percentage that these components represent of each of our Named Executive Officer’s total direct compensation in 2014 is reflected below.

LOGO

In addition, our Named Executive Officers receive a benefit, assuming the completion of five years of service with Alleghany, or a subsidiary of Alleghany (fifteen years of service is required in order to receiveunder the full benefit), under a retirement plan,Retirement Plan, although such benefit was frozen in 2013.

The percentage that these elements represent of the 2017 compensation for our chief executive officer and our other Named Executive Officers is reflected below.

LOGO

Set out below in more detail is a description and analysis of each of these componentselements of our compensation program.

-48-


Salary

We seek to pay salaries that are sufficiently competitive to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee generally makes salary adjustments annually, in consultation with FW Cook, based on salaries for the prior year, general inflation, individual performance and internal comparability considerations. The following actions were taken with respect to 20142017 salaries for our Named Executive Officers:

 

    2013 Salary      2014 Salary   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

  $1,250,000    LOGO     $1,000,000    Increase percentage of compensation tied to financial performance and deductibility under Section 162(m)

Mr. Brandon

   1,000,000    LOGO      800,000    Increase percentage of compensation tied to financial performance and internal comparability considerations with respect to CEO compensation

Mr. Dalrymple

   550,000    LOGO      600,000    Recognition of 2013 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

Mr. Gorham

   600,000    LOGO      600,000    No change due to sufficiently competitive level of pay and increase in January 2013

Mr. Sennott

   550,000    LOGO      600,000    Recognition of 2013 performance and internal comparability considerations with other Senior Vice Presidents

    2016 Salary      2017 Salary   Rationale

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000   LOGO  $1,000,000   No change due to continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Brandon

   825,000   LOGO   850,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Dalrymple

   650,000   LOGO   670,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Gorham

   600,000   LOGO   620,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

Mr. Sennott

   650,000   LOGO   670,000   3% increase reflecting 2017 contributions and continued emphasis on performance-linked compensation.

-43-


Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

We generally pay annual cash incentives to our Named Executive Officers under the 20102015 MIP. TheseThe intent of these annual cash incentive awards are intendedis to provide apay-for-performance element for the achievement of Alleghany’s shorter-term objectives.

In making 2017 awards under the 20102015 MIP, the Compensation Committee recognizesrecognized that, given the nature of Alleghany’s business and long-term approach, how we achieveAlleghany achieves shorter-term objectives can be a subjective process, but believesbelieved this is mitigated by the fact that these 2017 annual cash incentive awards under the 2010 MIP arewere subject to two meaningful limitations.

First, with respect to 2014 awards, no payout to any Named Executive Officer under the 2010 MIP could exceed the amount of his targetmaximum annual incentive opportunity set at the beginning of 2014. Thus, for 2014, this resulted2017, resulting in a $2.5an approximate $2.9 million maximum award amountopportunity for Mr. Hicks and an aggregate maximum award amountopportunity of approximately $5.5$6.2 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group. Second, funding of the 20142017 Incentive Pool Amount (as defined below) is limited by theto a specified level of earnings produced by management in 2014.2017. To the extent the funding of the 20142017 Incentive Pool Amount had been less than the aggregate maximum award amount of approximately $5.5$6.2 million for our Named Executive Officers as a group, apro-rata reduction of individual award amounts would have occurred. To the extent that Alleghany had a loss for 2014,2017, no payout would have been made under the 20102015 MIP. In sum, payouts under the 20102015 MIP for 20142017 performance are the lesser of (i) the 20142017 Incentive Pool Amount orand (ii) the targetmaximum opportunity for management (as may be reduced by the Compensation Committee for individual performance).

-49-


2014 Process

TargetThe Compensation Committee makes annual incentive awards for the upcoming year and determines each named Executive Officer’s appropriate target amount in respectJanuary of performancethat year after evaluating projected earnings for 2014 were made by the Compensation Committee on January 21, 2014. 2014prior year. 2017 target annual incentive awards under the 2010 MIP were stated as a percentage of each Named Executive Officer’s base salary and maximum incentive opportunities were as follows:

 

  2014
Salary
   

Target

Opportunity %

   

Target

Opportunity $ 

   

2017

Salary

  Target
Opportunity($/%)
  Maximum
Opportunity($)(1)

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     250    $2,500,000     $1,000,000   $1,900,000   (190%)    $2,850,000

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     200     1,600,000     850,000    1,130,500   (133%)    1,700,000

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000     100     600,000     670,000    449,000   (67%)    670,000

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     40     240,000     620,000    205,000   (33%)    310,000

Mr. Sennott

   600,000     100     600,000     670,000    449,000   (67%)    670,000
      

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

 

Total 2014 Annual Incentive Opportunities

  

  $5,540,000  

Totals

   $3,810,000    $4,133,500     $6,200,000
      

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

 

(1)The maximum opportunity percentage for each respective Named Executive Officer is approximately 150% of such Named Executive Officer’s target award.

The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account varying levels of responsibility, internal comparability, the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officer levels on the accomplishment of Alleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives and competitive considerations. For 2017 annual incentive awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2016, except for Mr. Hicks whose opportunity at target was increased to 190% of salary, or $1.9 million, with a maximum opportunity of $2,850,000 for the reasons discussed on page 46.

Payout of 2014 awards wasis tied to the achievement of a specified financial performance objective, subject to reduction in respect of Alleghany performance and/or individual performance. The financial performance objective wasis set in January, 2014, after evaluating projected earnings for 20142017 and determining each Named Executive Officer’s appropriate target opportunity amount. With respect to individual performance objectives, in January 2014, each of our Named Executive Officers submittedsubmits individual objectives for the coming year, with Mr. Hicks submitting his to the Board and the other Named Executive Officers submitting their individual objectives to Mr. Hicks. These objectives are in addition to the core responsibilities of our Named Executive Officers. Status updates on the achievement of such individual objectives and performance of core responsibilities wereare given through the year by each Named Executive Officer, culminating in a final report made in advance of payout determinations made by the Board and Compensation Committee in February 2015.

-44-


at the beginning of the following year. In this regard, Mr. Hicks providedprovides a self-evaluation to the Board of his performance against objectives during the year and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott providedprovide Mr. Hicks with the same, which Mr. Hicks then reviewedreviews with the Compensation Committee.

Financial Performance Objective

The 20142017 financial performance goal established by the Compensation Committee for annual incentive awards to our Named Executive Officers was based on a funding approach, which was capped at an amount equal to 3% of 20142017 earnings before income taxes, as reported in Alleghany’s audited financial statements, as adjusted, or the “2014“2017 Incentive Pool Amount,” to:

 

exclude effects of accounting changes, charges for goodwill or intangibles impairment (including other than temporary impairment charges);

 

exclude expenses incurred in connection with actual and potential acquisitionsacquisitions; and

 

-50-


deduct from 20142017 earnings a rolling four-year (2010-2013)(2013-2016) average of catastrophe losses at RSUI, our principal insurance subsidiary, and TransRe, our principal reinsurance subsidiary, instead of actual 20142017 catastrophe losses at RSUI and TransRe.

With respect to catastrophe losses, RSUI’s 2010-20132013-2016 catastrophe average was $88.7$45.7 million, or the “RSUI CAT Average,” compared with 20142017 actual catastrophe losses of $44.4$223.8 million, net of prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. TransRe’s 2010-20132013-2016 catastrophe average was $356.2$79.2 million, or the “TransRe CAT Average,” compared with 20142017 actual catastrophe losses of $46.8 million. These differences mean that an additional $353.7$525.1 million, net of catastrophe losses were deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings in determining the funding for the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount than would have been deducted from Alleghany’s pre-tax earnings using actual 2014 catastrophe losses.

prior year development and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. The use of the RSUI CAT Average and TransRe CAT Average rather than the actual amount of their respective 20142017 catastrophe losses was based upon the Compensation Committee’s acknowledgement that RSUI and TransRe are significant writers of catastrophe exposed property (re)insurance and that management cannot predict the occurrence or severity of catastrophe losses in any particular year. Using a four-year average recognizes that catastrophe losses are a cost of doing business and accounts for them in a manner consistent with Alleghany’s focus on long-term performance. In this regard, actual catastrophe losses whether in excess of, or less than, actual catastrophe losses in a particular year, impact funding calculations for annual incentive pools during the four-year averaging period in which they are included. A year in which Alleghany experiences significant catastrophe losses, such as it did during 2017, will impact MIP annual incentive pool funding for the subsequent four years, holding management fully accountable for such catastrophe losses.

Individual Performance Objectives

In January 2014,2017, Mr. Hicks provided the Board, and Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott provided Mr. Hicks, with their 2017 objectives for 2014 that were in addition to performance of their core responsibilities. These core and 20142017 objectives for our Named Executive Officers included the following:

 

    Core Responsibilities  20142017 Objectives

Mr. Hicks

  

•   Building stockholder value over the long-term,long term, reported and measured regularly

•   Consolidated 20142017 financial results

•   Ultimate responsibility for reinsurance and insurance subsidiary underwriting performance

•    Improve the competitive positions of CapSpecialty and PacificComp

•    Work with TransRe on its strategic alternatives in the current reinsurance market cycle

•    Oversee the continued development of Alleghany’s in-house private and public equity subsidiaries

-45-


Core Responsibilities2014 Objectives

•   Ultimate responsibility for equity and fixed income portfolio investment performance

•   Management development at parent and subsidiaries

  

•   Continue underwriting improvement at CapSpecialty and PacificComp

•   Consider strategic alternatives at the parent and subsidiary levels

•   Oversee the continued development of Alleghany Capital, including acquisitions at an attractive price

•   Manage corporate equity investment portfolio for attractive long-term total returns

Mr. Brandon

  

•   Primary operational oversight of Alleghany’s reinsurance and insurance subsidiaries

•   Ensure that each insurance subsidiary meets its 20142017 business plan

•   Oversee the operations of TransRe from a parent-level and stockholder perspective as Chairman of TransRe’s Board of Directors

•   Assist the CEO with the strategic development of Alleghany and its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries

  

•   EvaluateSupport (re)insurance subsidiaries in achieving their profitability targets and implement, as applicable, TransRe third party capital initiativesstrategic goals

•   Work withEvaluate strategic developments and issues affecting Alleghany and its (re)insurance operations

•   Analyze and lead potential (re)insurance acquisition or investment opportunities

•   Help TransRe to develop incremental profitable business opportunities

•    Monitor TransRe economic capital model

•   Work with PacificComp and CapSpecialty management teams on profitability initiativesin executing their business plans

-51-


Core Responsibilities2017 Objectives

Mr. Dalrymple

  

•   Ultimate oversight forOversee management of all legal issues at parent and subsidiaries, including transactional, litigation and regulatory

•   Oversight ofOversee corporate governance and secretarial functions

•   Ultimate legal oversight ofOversee SEC disclosure reports

•   Ultimate oversight ofOversee legal costs at parent and subsidiaries

  

•   Complete legal transition of in-house private equityManage corporate governance matters and public equity divisions into subsidiariesevaluate possible governance changes

•   Work with CapSpecialtyBoard on legal aspects of new compensation plansBoard size and strategic initiativesdirector search considerations

•   WorkOversee and manage relationships with TransRe legal on proposed strategic initiativesgovernance and proxy advisors

•   Analyze opportunities for further efficiencies with respect toOversee legal costsand human resources integration of Alleghany Capital acquisitions

Mr. Gorham

  

•   Management of $16.0$14.0 billion fixed income portfolio

•   Chairman of TransRe, RSUI and PacificComp Board of Directors investment committees

•   Treasurer for Alleghany

  

•   Improve reporting from outside bond managersEvaluate fixed income management and articulate and execute succession planning matters

•   Manage regulatory issues with respect toEvaluate and invest in a new fixed income portfolio foreign exchange programsasset class, or expand existing class

•   Execute onWork with Roundwood management to coordinate new equity allocation of fixed income to Ares Management LP

•    Set investment guidelines for new TransRe London Limited subsidiary

Mr. Sennott

  

•   Principal financial officer responsible for the fair and accurate presentation of the financial results

•   Oversight of Alleghany financial function and maintenance of control environment

•   Responsible for capital management and annual strategic planning efforts

•   Responsible for rating agency relationships and management

  

•   Update, improve and streamline internalAnalyze for possible improvement the Board quarterly financial analysispackage

•   Oversee risk management initiatives in 2014Standardize the Alleghany Capital financial reporting package and add financial resource capability

•   Oversee improvements toRenew Alleghany website

•    Complete and present overarching review and analysis of capital management initiativescredit agreement

-46-


Payouts under the 2010 MIP with respect to 20142017 Performance

Based on our 20142017 financial results, the 20142017 Incentive Pool Funding Amount was $19.2approximately $21.9 million, so that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott were eligible to receive fullmaximum payout in February 20152018 of their 2014 target2017 incentive opportunities, aggregating to $5.5$6.2 million, under the 20102015 MIP based on achievement of the financial performance goal, subject to reduction for individual performance.

At its meeting on February 24, 2015,21, 2018, the Compensation Committee evaluated Alleghany’s overall corporate performance and the individual performance of Mr. Hicks, and Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s recommendation regarding the individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers.

With respect to Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s individual performance, the Compensation Committee noted the following achievements,positive factors, among others, during 2014:2017:

 

2014 growtha 7.4% increase in book valuecommon stockholders’ equity per share to $553.20 at 2017year-end from $515.24 at 2016year-end despite incurring $511 million of 12.7%;

after-tax net catastrophe losses representing 6.0% of Alleghany’s capital at the beginning of 2017, in a year when the industry is estimated to have incurred over $130 billion of worldwide catastrophe losses;

 

Growth in book value per sharesignificant outperformance of 9.6% over a five-year period and growth in book value of 8.6% over a ten-year period;

Record underwriting results in 2014, with a consolidated underwriting profit of approximately $495 million;

Record earnings per share of $41.40 in 2014;

Improved underwriting results at CapSpecialty and PacificComp and

Benchmark outperformancebenchmarks by the parent companyAlleghany’s equity portfolio and fixed income portfolio during portfolios;

the year.consummation of the sale in December 2017 of PacificComp to Copperpoint Mutual Insurance Company;

-52-


continuedbuild-out of Alleghany Capital manufacturing and service businesses; including the acquisition of a majority interest in by Alleghany Capital of WWSC Holdings, LLC and a minority interest in Wilbert Funeral Services, Inc.

continued underwriting profitability at CapSpecialty, Inc.; and

generation by Alleghany Capital manufacturing and services businesses of Adjusted EBITDA of $81.3 million in 2017, an increase of 57.9% from the $51.5 million generated in 2016.

These positive factors were partially offset by offset by factors including continued unprofitable results at Stranded Oil Resources Corporation.

After consideration of these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined to make a payout to Mr. Hicks of his 2017 annual incentive opportunity at $2,137,500, representing 112.5% of his target opportunity and 75% of his maximum opportunity. Mr. Hicks’s 2017 annual incentive payout represented an approximate 16.2% decrease from his 2016 annual incentive payout. Regarding individual performance of the other Named Executive Officers, Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s recommendations reflected the achievementhis assessment of individual objectives for Messrs. Brandon, Dalrymple and Sennott. For Mr. Brandon, the payout reflected the very profitable 2014 underwriting results at TransRe and RSUI, underwriting result improvements at CapSpecialty and PacificComp, support of TransRe for its third party capital initiatives and accomplishment of strategic initiatives at our (re)insurance subsidiaries. For Mr. Dalrymple, the payout reflected superior performance of hiswith respect to their core responsibilities, and achievement of his 2014their 2017 objectives, particularly with respectpartially offset, in the case of Messrs. Brandon, Sennott and Dalrymple the team approach taken to CapSpecialty’s 2014 initiatives and plans, his legal support of TransRe’s strategic initiatives and the successful and efficient formalization of Alleghany’s private and public equity management operations. For Mr. Sennott, thefinal payout reflected superior performance of his core responsibilities as well as achievement of his 2014 objectives, including improvements to Alleghany’s financial reporting, enhancements to the enterprise risk management process and the successful issuance of Alleghany long-term debt and refinancing of a portion of TransRe’s debt. For Mr. Gorham, the payout reflected the improved reporting process from outside bond managers, the successful implementation of a foreign exchange hedging capability, the deployment of assets into Ares-managed strategies and the establishment of investment guidelines for TransRe’s new London subsidiary.

recommendations. Following the evaluations ofby Mr. Hicks andof the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee authorized full payoutpayouts of 2014 target2017 annual bonus opportunities at 125% of target and 75% of maximum to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott and at maximum for Mr. Gorham under the 20102015 MIP for an aggregate payout to them in the amount of approximately $5.5 million.$2.6 million, an approximate 20.0% decrease from the aggregate prior year annual incentive payout to them.

Long-Term Equity BasedEquity-Based Incentive Compensation

In 2014,2017, we made awards of long-term incentive compensation to our Named Executive Officers under the 2012 LTIP. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made primarily in the form of performance shares and, in certain cases, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units. Awards of performance shares under the 2012 LTIP are intended to provide apay-for-performance component of compensation based upon the achievement of longer-term financial objectives focused on growth in book value per share. Awards of restricted

-47-


stock or restricted stock units under the 2012 LTIP are intended to provide a retention component of compensation, the value of which is tied to the market price of our common stock.

Performance Shares

For the 2014-20172017-2020 award period, the Compensation Committee based the number of performance shares awarded to each Named Executive Officer upon a percentage of such officer’s 20142017 salary (as determined by the Compensation Committee) divided by the average closing prices of common stock for the30-day period prior to the mailing of material for the meeting of the Compensation Committee at which such awards were made. Such percentages of 20142017 salary were as follows:

 

  2014 Salary   Opportunity %   Opportunity $    2017 Salary   Opportunity%   Opportunity $  

Mr. Hicks

  $1,000,000     400    $4,000,000    $1,000,000    450           $4,500,000 

Mr. Brandon

   800,000     300     2,400,000     850,000    300            2,550,000 

Mr. Dalrymple

   600,000     100     600,000     670,000    100            670,000 

Mr. Gorham

   600,000     40     240,000     620,000    50            310,000 

Mr. Sennott

   600,000     100     600,000     670,000    100            670,000 
      

 

       

 

 

Total 2014 Performance Share Opportunities

  

  $7,840,000  

Total 2017 Performance Share Opportunities

Total 2017 Performance Share Opportunities

 

  $8,700,000     
      

 

       

 

 

-53-


The differing target awards as a percentage of salary reflect the Compensation Committee’s determinations of appropriate levels and mix of compensation components, taking into account varying levels of responsibility, within Alleghany, internal comparability, and the implicit impact of the various Named Executive Officers on the accomplishment of ourAlleghany’s financial, strategic and operational objectives, and competitive considerations. With respect to Mr. Hicks in particular, his 20142017 performance share award reflected the Compensation Committee’s determination to further tie Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s compensation closely to Alleghany’s financial performance and its views of the challenge of meeting the financial performance goals for the 2014-20172017-2020 award period in light of the current interest rate environment and (re)insurance market environment. The Compensation Committee had, in general, determined that increasing Mr. Hicks’ percentage opportunity for annual performance share awards was preferable for long-term retention purposes to the making of a significant one-time special equity-based award.environments. For 20152017 performance share awards, the opportunities for each of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of salary, were the same as those set forth above for 2014.2016, except for Mr. Hicks whose opportunity at target was increased to 450% of salary from 400% of salary.

In making performance share awards for the 2014-20172017-2020 period, the Compensation Committee took account of:considered:

 

Alleghany’s financial objective in the current economic environment of increasinggrowing book value per share at rates of7-10% over the long term without employing excessive amounts of financial leverage and withoutor taking imprudent risks;

 

the prevailing financial and economic conditions and uncertainties and

uncertainties;

 

the alignment of performance goals with Alleghany’s near-term strategy, with a particular emphasis on maintaining Alleghany’s financial strength.

strength; and

Taking into account such conditions, Alleghany’s strategy,

its desire to set performance goals at levels high enough to encourage strong performance but still reasonably attainable to avoid encouraging the prevailing use of excessive financial leverage or taking of imprudent risks.

the current10-year U.S. Treasury rates and prevailing equity risk premiums adjusted for Alleghany’s estimated stock volatility relative to the market,market.

Taking into account such conditions, the Compensation Committee set the following performance goals for the 2014-20172017-2020 period:

 

maximum payouts at 150% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date for average annual compound growth in our Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 20122017 LTIP) of 9% or more over the four-year award period ending December 31, 2017,2020, as adjusted for stock dividends;

 

-48-


target payouts at 100% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 7%, and payouts at 50% of the value of one share of common stock on the payout date if such growth equals 5%, with payouts for growth between the foregoing levels to be determined by straight line interpolationinterpolation; and

 

no payouts if such growth is less than 5%.

The Compensation Committee believed that the above payout thresholds would continue to be challenging to meet, particularly in light of slow economic growth, a prolonged period of very low interest rates when a significant portion of Alleghany’s (re)insurance subsidiary investment assets are required to be held in high-quality fixed income securities, relatively high current valuations in equity markets and the imperative to maintain underwriting discipline, even if it means shrinking top-line growth, in the continuing extremely competitive reinsurance and insurance markets due to an abundance of both traditional and new alternative underwriting capacity.

Restricted Stock Units

In 2014,2017, long-term incentive opportunities for Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott included 759 restricted stock units, representing awards set at 50% of their respective base salaries, which cliff-vest four years from date of

-54-


grant. These grants of restricted stock units are intended to further align Mr. Dalrymple’s and Mr. Sennott’s interests with those of our stockholders, while incenting the prudence desired in their roles as General Counsel and Chief Financial Officerchief financial officer in preserving stockholder value.

Perquisites

Our general practice is to not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers. In 2014,2017, no Named Executive Officer received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.

Deferred Compensation Plan

We credit an amount equal to 15% of a Named Executive Officer’s base salary to the Deferred Compensation Plan each year. Entitlement to this savings benefit is not based on performance. As it is our intention that a significant portion of compensation for our Named Executive Officers be contingent on performance objectives, the savings benefit offered by the Deferred Compensation Plan provides a stable component of total compensation. In addition, the Deferred Compensation Plan permits our Named Executive Officers to elect to defer the receipt, and thus the taxation, of all or part of their base salary and their annual cash bonus. A participant may choose to have savings benefit credit amounts and deferred salary and bonus amounts either credited with interest, treated as though invested in our common stock or increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline in our stockholders’ equity per share.

Retirement Plan

Retirement benefits for our Named Executive Officers are provided under the Retirement Plan. Under the Retirement Plan, a participant must have completed five years of service with Alleghany or a subsidiary of Alleghany before he or she is vested in, and thus has a right to receive, any retirement benefits following his or her termination of employment. Completion of fifteen years of service is required in order to receive a full benefit under the Retirement Plan. Effective December 31, 2013, the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefits for existing participants will accrue after such date. Any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of December 31, 2013 will continue to have future service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement.

Financial Statement Restatements

It is our Board’s policy that the Compensation Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation awarded or paid to any of our officers where the award or payment was predicated upon the achievement of

-49-


performance goals that were subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of any such award or payment. In this regard, the Compensation Committee is authorized to have Alleghany seek to recover any amount the Compensation Committee determines was inappropriately received by any officer.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

We maintain a policy on insider trading and compliance that prohibits our officers from directly or indirectly purchasing or using financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Alleghany securities they own. In addition, under such policy, officers are prohibited from pledging Alleghany securities as collateral.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

We expect our executive officers to achieve ownership of our common stock having an aggregate value (based upon the higher of market value or book value) equal to a multiple of base salary, as follows: for our

-55-


President and chief executive officer, the multiple is five times base salary; for our Executive Vice President, the multiple is four times base salary; for our Senior Vice Presidents, the multiple is three times base salary; and for our Vice Presidents, the multiple is one times base salary. We expect our executive officers to retain 75% of the shares of common stock (net of taxes) awardedpaid out to them under our long-term incentive plans until they achieve their applicable ownership levels, and they are expected to maintain such levels thereafter.

Tax Considerations

We areJanuary 2017 Compensation Determinations

When 2017 incentive compensation determinations were made, we were not allowed a deduction under Section 162(m) of the Code for any compensation paid to a “covered employee” in excess of $1.0 million per year, subject to certain exceptions. In general, “covered employees” includeincluded our President and chief executive officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (not including our chief financial officer) who arewere in our employ and arewere officers at the end of the tax year. Among other exceptions, the deduction limit doesdid not apply to compensation that meetsmet the specified requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for “performance-based compensation.” In general, those requirements includeincluded the establishment of objective performance goals for the payment of such compensation by a committee of the board of directors composed solely of two or more outside directors, stockholder approval of the material terms of such compensation prior to payment, and certification by the committee that the performance goals have been achieved prior to the payment of such compensation. Such requirements permitpermitted the committee administering the plan to make discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would reduce payouts but dodid not permit discretionary adjustments to performance goals that would increase payouts.

The 2015 MIP permitted the Compensation Committee to grant awards that were intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, or “qualifying awards,” and awards that were not intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, or“non-qualifying awards.” Consistent with the 2015 MIP and the Compensation Committee’s consideration and balancing of its executive compensation objectives, the amounts identified under the Stock Awards andNon-Equity Incentive Plan columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 58 paid to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham for 2017, 2016 and 2015 are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, except for the restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Dalrymple in those years. Mr. Sennott’s compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017, 2016 and 2015 did not have to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code because a person serving as our chief financial officer at the end of a given year was not a “covered” employee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code for such year.

The Compensation Committee believes that establishing appropriate compensation arrangements to retain and incent our executive officers best serves our interests and the interests of our stockholders. In order to maintain flexibility to compensate our executive officers in a manner designed to promote long-term corporate goals and objectives, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all executive compensation must be deductible. However, the Compensation Committee also believes that, when appropriate, consideration should be given to seeking to maximize the deductibility of the compensation paid to our executive officers.

The 2010 MIP permitsTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, or the Compensation Committee to grant awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of“TCJA”, substantially modified Section 162(m) of the Code and, among other things, eliminated the performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, beginning in 2018, compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million will generally be nondeductible, regardless of whether it is performance-based. In addition, beginning in 2018, the executive officers subject to Section 162(m), or, “qualifying awards,”the “Covered Employees”, will include any individual who served as the chief executive officer or chief financial

-56-


officer at any time during the taxable year and the three other most highly compensated officers (other than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) for the taxable year, and once an individual becomes a Covered Employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a Covered Employee for all future years, including following any termination of employment.

The TCJA includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not materially modified after that date. To the extent applicable to existing contracts and awards, that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation, or “non-qualifying awards.” Consistent with the 2010 MIP and the Compensation Committee’s considerationCommittee may avail itself of this transition rule. However, because of uncertainties as to the application and balancinginterpretation of the transition rule, no assurances can be given at this time that our existing contracts and awards, even if in place on November 2, 2017, will meet the requirements of the transition rule. Moreover, to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals in the best interest of the company, the Compensation Committee does not limit its actions with respect to executive compensation to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) if the Compensation Committee determines that doing so is in the best interests of Alleghany.

January 2018 Compensation Determinations

Salary adjustments for the coming year and new incentive awards are generally made by the Compensation Committee in January each year. In this regard, at its meeting in January 2018, the Compensation Committee determined 2018 salaries and 2018 annual incentive award opportunities for each of the Named Executive Officers. At its meeting in February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined 2018-2021 long-term incentive awards for each of the Named Executive Officers. In making these awards, the Compensation Committee had determined to keep the general structure of its executive compensation objectives, the amounts identified under the Stock Awardsannual incentive and Non-Equity Incentive Plan columnslong-term incentive programs in place in light of the SummaryTCJA’s recent passage and inability to fully assess its impact on Alleghany’s compensation programs. During 2018, the Compensation Table on page 52 paidCommittee will work with FW Cook and management to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham for

-50-


2014 and 2013 and to Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple for 2012 are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m)consider the impact of the Code, except for the restricted stock units awarded to Mr. Dalrymple in 2014TCJA on Alleghany’s compensation programs and 2013 and to Mr. Brandon in 2012. The cash bonus paid to Mr. Sennott for 2013 identified under the Bonus Column of the Summary Compensation Table does not qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). Mr. Sennott’s compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for 2014 and 2013 and Mr. Gorham’s compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for 2012 do not have to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code because a person serving as our chief financial officer at the end of a given year is not a “covered” employee for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code for such year.possible changes with respect thereto.

Compensation Policies and Practices Relating to Risk Management

Risk analysis has always been part of our design and review of our group-wide executive incentive plans, and the Compensation Committee regularly monitors compensation policies, practices and outstanding awards to determine whether our risk management and incentive objectives are being met with respect to group-wide employee incentives. Our material risks include investment risk (debt and equity), as well as catastrophe losses and material mispricing of risk at our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. The Board’s and management’s risk oversight is discussed on pages 516 and 6.17. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from our group-wide compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Alleghany. In this regard, as discussed on pages 3440 and 35,41, our short and long-term incentive plans are capped at individual levels so as not to incent imprudent risk taking to achieve outsized payouts. In addition, our officers are required to own a substantial amount of common stock to ensure that they maintain a significant stake in our long-term success, and we have in place a compensation clawback policy applicable to our officers to further discourage imprudent risk taking. Further, we do not grant stock options to officers as we do not wish to reward or punish them for exogenous short-term market price movements. The managementsmanagement teams of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are incented to write profitable business and have no incentives to grow premium volume by underpricing risk. The Compensation Committee seeks to set realistic incentive goals, monitors them in light of economic conditions and our strategy and risk tolerance,appetite, and will consider appropriate adjustments in respect thereof in the event of any conflict between incentives and the Board’s strategy and risk tolerance.

appetite.

 

-51--57-


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under this heading relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers during 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year Salary Bonus(1) Stock
Awards(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
 All Other
Compensation(5)
 Total  Year Salary Bonus Stock
Awards(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
 All Other
Compensation(4)
 SEC Total Total not
Including
Change in
Pension
Value(5)

Weston M. Hicks

  2014   $1,000,000       $3,959,904   $2,500,000   $2,914,467   $168,675   $10,543,046   2017 $1,000,000   $4,502,372 $2,137,500 $1,844,203 $163,287 $9,647,362 $7,803,159

President and chief

executive officer

  2013    1,250,000        3,983,966    2,000,000        213,759    7,447,725   2016 1,000,000   3,914,614 2,550,000 945,832 162,482 8,572,928 7,627,096
 2012    1,250,000        2,514,334    2,062,500    1,259,316    245,581    7,331,731    2015 1,000,000   4,026,509 1,700,000   166,176 6,892,685 6,892,685

Joseph P. Brandon

  2014    800,000        2,376,099    1,600,000    254,392    135,071    5,165,562   2017 850,000   2,551,040 1,275,000 137,703 136,930 4,950,673 4,812,970

Executive Vice President (6)

  2013    1,000,000        2,124,755    1,200,000    337,805    167,907    4,830,467   2016 825,000   2,421,908 1,650,000 81,904 132,650 5,111,462 5,029,558
 2012    821,970(7)       10,521,105    1,200,000    338,632    4,174,312    17,056,019    2015 800,000   2,415,815 1,620,000   132,716 4,968,531 4,968,531

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000    702,363    100,232    2,892,997   2017 670,000   1,005,195 502,000 416,635 106,674 2,700,504 2,283,869

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel,

and Secretary

  2013    550,000        876,778    550,000    29,707    92,347    2,098,832  
 2012    450,000        543,192    438,750    229,931    119,780    1,781,653  
       

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and

Secretary

  
2016
2015

  
650,000
630,000

  


  
953,985
951,133

  
650,000
614,250

  

223,156


  
103,256
103,890

  
2,580,397
2,299,273

  
2,357,241
2,299,273

Roger B. Gorham

  2014    600,000        237,258    240,000    373,171    100,692    1,551,121  

Senior Vice President-

Head of Fixed

Income and Treasurer

  2013    600,000        233,642    220,000        101,542    1,155,184  
 2012    550,000        663,997    536,250    237,544    144,586    2,132,377  
       

Roger B. Gorham(6)

 2017 620,000   309,900 310,000 314,528 99,997 1,654,425 1,339,897

Former Senior Vice

President - Head of Fixed

Income and Treasurer

  
2016
2015

  
600,000
600,000

  


  
293,678
271,557

  
300,000
270,000

  
187,310
256,464

  
96,708
100,572

  
1,477,696
1,498,593

  
1,290,386
1,242,129

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2014    600,000        890,402    600,000        100,691    2,191,093   2017 670,000   1,005,195 502,000   107,135 2,284,330 2,284,330

Senior Vice President and chief

financial officer

  2013    389,583(8)  $180,000    1,357,448    550,000        65,971    2,543,002   2016 650,000   953,985 650,000   103,753 2,357,738 2,357,738

Senior Vice President and

chief financial officer

 2015 630,000   951,133 614,250   104,422 2,299,805 2,299,805

 

(1)Reflects a cash bonus paid to Mr. Sennott upon commencement of his employment with Alleghany.

(2)Represents the grant date fair value of performance shares granted to the Named Executive Officers listed below under the 2007 LTIP and the 2012 LTIP, computed in accordance with ASC 718. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Form10-K. The grant date fair value of such performance shares, assuming payouts at maximum, is as follows:

 

Name

  2014   2013   2012 

Mr. Hicks

  $5,939,856    $5,975,949    $3,771,502  

Mr. Brandon

   3,564,148     3,187,137     6,011,114  

Mr. Dalrymple

   890,597     876,423     814,788  

Mr. Gorham

   355,887     350,463     995,995  

Mr. Sennott

   890,597     2,036,173       

For Mr. Brandon, the 2012 amount represents the grant date fair value of (i) 12,403 performance shares granted to him under the 2007 LTIP for all outstanding award periods at the date of grant on March 6, 2012, with a grant date fair value of $6,011,114 assuming payouts at maximum, (ii) 11,137 shares of fully-vested, non-forfeitable restricted common stock awarded to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58), with a grant date fair value of $3,598,365, and (iii) 9,023 restricted stock units granted to him under the 2007 LTIP pursuant to a restricted stock unit matching agreement (the terms of which are described in more detail on page 58), with a grant date fair value of $2,915,331.

Name

  2017   2016   2015 

Mr. Hicks

  $6,753,558   $5,871,922   $6,039,764 

Mr. Brandon

   3,826,559    3,632,861    3,623,722 

Mr. Dalrymple

   1,005,499    953,986    951,133 

Mr. Gorham

   464,849    440,517    407,336 

Mr. Sennott

   1,005,499    953,986    951,133 

 

    For Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott, the 2014 amount includesamounts in this column also include the grant date fair value of $296,670 of 759 restricted stock units awarded to himthem under the 2012 LTIP and the 2013 amount includes the grant date fair value of $292,496 of 825 restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP.

-52-


For Mr. Sennott, the 2014 amount includes the grant date fair value of $296,670 of 759 restricted stock units awarded to him under the 2012 LTIP and the 2013 amount represents the grant to him on April 15, 2013 of 3,540 performance shares under the 2012 LTIP for all outstanding award periods having a grant date fair value of $2,036,173 assuming payouts at maximum.as follows:

 

Year

  Restricted Stock Units(#)  Grant Date Fair Value($)

2017

    550   $334,862

2016

    680    317,995

2015

    697    317,044

(3)(2)Represents cash incentive earned pursuant to awards under the 20102015 MIP.

 

(4)(3)

Reflects change in actuarial present value of pension benefits during 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015. For Mr. Sennott, reflects that he is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The actual change in pension value was negative in 2013 for Mr. Hicks and Mr. Gorham. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Change in actuarial present value of pension

-58-


benefits is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Alleghany performance. Therefore,In this regard, approximately $1.3 million of the amount for 2017 relates to the decrease in the discount rate set mechanically by accounting policy in reference to a third-party benchmark. The actual change in pension value in 2015 was negative for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Dalrymple. However, SEC regulations do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table. Based on the above, we do not believe a year-over-year change in actuarial pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes, and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham under “Change in Pension Value” on pages 56 and 57page 61 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 63 and 6467 through 69 to be useful for an understanding of the pension benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

(5)(4)All Other Compensation amounts reflect the following items:

 

Name

 Year Post-Retirement
Medical Plan(a)
 Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(b)
 Tax
Reimbursement(c)
 Savings
Benefit(d)
 Success Fee
Arrangement(e)
 Consulting
Arrangement(f)
 Total   Year  Life Insurance and
Long-Term
Disability(a)
  Tax
Reimbursement(b)
  Savings
Benefit(c)
  Total

Weston M. Hicks

  2014       $8,500   $8,612   $151,563     $168,675     2017   $6,600   $6,687   $150,000   $163,287
  2013        14,320    11,939    187,500            213,759     2016   6,200   6,282   150,000   td62,482
 2012   $35,218    13,320    11,105    185,938            245,581    2015   8,035   8,141   150,000   166,176

Joseph P. Brandon

  2014        7,220    6,601    121,250      135,071     2017   $5,008   $4,579   $127,344   $136,931
  2013        10,260    7,647    150,000            167,907     2016   4,731   4,325   123,594   132,650
  2012    146,033    6,437    4,797    117,045   $3,500,000   $400,000    4,174,312     2015   6,643   6,073   120,000   132,716

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  2014        5,508    5,036    89,688      100,232     2017   $3,290   $3,008   $100,375   $106,673
  2013        6,000    4,472    81,875            92,347     2016   3,072   2,809   97,375   103,256
  2012    43,031    5,550    4,136    67,063            119,780     2015   5,003   4,574   94,313   103,890

Roger B. Gorham

  2014        6,108    5,584    90,000      101,692     2017   $3,655   $3,342   $93,000   $  99,997
  2013        6,792    5,062    89,688            101,542     2016   3,504   3,204   90,000   96,708
  2012    50,539    6,616    4,931    82,500            144,586     2015   5,523   5,049   90,000   100,572

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  2014        5,748    5,255    89,688      100,691  

John L. Sennott, Jr

   2017   $3,532   $3,229   $100,375   $107,136
  2013        6,286    4,685    55,000            65,971     2016   3,332   3,046   97,375   103,753
   2015   5,281   4,828   94,313   104,422

 

 (a)Amounts represent the change in Post-Retirement Medical Plan benefit value during each of the years presented. No amount is shown with respect to 2014 and 2013 as the Post-Retirement Medical Plan was terminated effective September 30, 2013.

(b)Amounts represent the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by Alleghany for the benefit of such individuals for life insurance and long-term disability insurance maintained by Alleghany on their behalf in each of the years presented. These life insurance policies provide a death benefit to each such officer if he is an employee at the time of his death equal to four times the amount of his annual salary at January 1 of the year of his death. These long-term disability insurance policies provide disability insurance coverage to each such officer in the event he becomes disabled (as defined in such policies) during his employment with Alleghany.

 

 (c)(b)Amounts represent the reimbursement of taxes, and the reimbursement itself, on income imputed to such individuals pursuant to Alleghany’s life insurance and long-term disability policies as described above in each of the years presented.

 

-53-


 (d)(c)Reflects savings benefit amounts credited by Alleghany pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan in each of the years presented. The method for calculating earnings on the savings benefit amounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan is set out on pages 61 and 6265 to 67 in the narrative accompanying the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table.

 

(5)(e)Reflects

The amounts in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the cash portionamounts reported in the “SEC Total” column. The amounts reported in this column are solely intended to facilitate a stockholder’s understanding of a payout made to Mr. Brandon pursuant to a success shares award agreement (the terms of which are describedhow changes in more detail on page 58).pension value impact the total compensation reported in the

 

-59-


 (f)Reflects cashSummary Compensation Table in any given year. To facilitate that understanding, this column shows total compensation receivedwithout pension value changes. The amounts reported in this column are calculated by Mr.subtracting the value reported in the “Change in Pension value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the “SEC Total” column. The calculation of the pension values and the causes of the significant year-over-year changes in pension value are and believe that stockholders may find the detailed explanation of changes in actuarial pension value for Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple and Gorham under “Change in Pension Value” on page 61 and the discussion of accumulated pension benefits under “Pension Benefits” on pages 67 through 69 to be useful for an understanding of the consulting servicespension benefits provided to Alleghany from January 1, 2012 to March 6, 2012 pursuant to a consulting arrangement entered into with Alleghany.the Named Executive Officers.

 

(6)Mr. Brandon was named an ExecutiveGorham retired from his positions as Senior Vice President — Head of Fixed Income and Treasurer of Alleghany oneffective March 6, 2012, upon the closing of the acquisition of TransRe. During the period from September 15, 2011 through the closing date, Mr. Brandon was engaged by Alleghany as a consultant.1, 2018.

(7)Represents pro rata portion of 2012 annual base salary of $1,000,000, reflecting Mr. Brandon’s commencement of employment with Alleghany in March 2012.

(8)Represents pro rata portion of 2013 annual base salary of $550,000, reflecting Mr. Sennott’s commencement of employment with Alleghany in April 2013.

-54-


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20142017

 

Name

  Grant Date   Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
   

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Share of
Stock or
Units (#)(3)
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards(4)
  Grant Date Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Share of
Stock or
Units(#)(3)
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
Awards($)(4)
  Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
     Target($) Maximum($) Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Weston M. Hicks

   1/21/14    $2,500,000     5,066     10,131     15,196      $3,959,904   1/17/2017 1,900,000 2,850,000 3,698 7,395 11,093   4,502,372

Joseph P. Brandon

   1/21/14     1,600,000     3,039     6,079     9,118       2,376,099   1/17/2017 1,130,500 1,700,000 2,095 4,190 6,285   2,551,040

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   1/21/14     600,000     759     1,519     2,278       593,732   1/17/2017 449,000 670,000 551 1,101 1,652 550 1,005,195
   1/21/14             759     296,670  

Roger B. Gorham

   1/21/14     240,000     303     607     910       237,258   1/17/2017 205,000 310,000 255 509 764   309,700

John L. Sennott, Jr.

   1/21/14     600,000     759     1,519     2,278       593,732   1/17/2017 449,000 670,000 551 1,101 1,652 550 1,005,195
   1/21/14             759     296,670  

 

(1)Reflects awards under the target annual incentive opportunity granted on January 21, 2014 to each of2015 MIP. For Messrs. Brandon, Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott. PayoutsSennott, target and maximum amounts reflect the range of awards that each such target amounts areNamed Executive Officer could have earned based upon Alleghany achieving a specified financial performance objective, subject to reduction to the extent that the aggregate amountin respect of awards to all of them exceeds the 2014 Incentive Pool Amount andAlleghany performance and/or individual performance. These amounts are also subject to decrease (but not increase) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based upon its evaluation of Alleghany’s overall financial and operational performance and their individual performance.

 

(2)Reflects the gross number of shares of common stock payable in connection with awards of performance shares for the 2014-20172017-2020 award period granted under the 2012 LTIP. Threshold amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share (as defined by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 2012 LTIP) equals 5% in the award period; target amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals 7% in the award period; and maximum amounts reflect estimated future payout of performance shares if average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share equals or exceeds 9% in the award period. If average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share is less than 5%, none of these performance shares would be payable. The determination of average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share for purposes of determining payouts of these awards is subject to adjustment for stock dividends.

 

(3)Reflects the awards to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott under the 2012 LTIP of restricted stock units that cliff vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date.

 

(4)Reflects the 20142017 value of performance share awards for the 2014-20172017-2020 award period under the 2012 LTIP for the Named Executive Officer, computed in accordance with ASC 718, assuming payouts at target and shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units awarded to each of Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Sennott.

 

-55--60-


Narrative Discussion Relating to the Summary Compensation Table and

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Change in Pension Value

Effective December 31, 2013, Alleghany’sthe Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and was “frozen” for existing participants so that no additional benefits would accrue after such date. Despite the freezing of the Retirement Plan, the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 may still show an increase or decrease in the value of our Named Executive Officers’ pension benefits. These changes in value are primarily driven by external variables, such as the discount rate, the mortality tables used and the passage of time. Set out below is a table showing the components of the change in pension value for the years 2012-20142015-2017 for our Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Retirement Plan.

 

Name

  Year   (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount
Rate(1)
 Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
   Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
   Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year(4)
   Total Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)
   Year  (Increase)
Decrease in
Discount
Rate(1)
 Change in
Mortality
Table(2)
 Passage of
Time/Age
Increase(3)
  Value of
Benefits
Accrued
During the
Year
  Total
Change
in Pension
Value(4)

Weston M. Hicks

   2014    $1,629,691   $862,795    $421,981         $2,914,467     2017   $1,353,162 $ $491,041       $1,844,203
   2013     (1,618,668       386,857          (1,231,811   2016   490,169 (25,871) 481,534       945,832
   2012     880,771         378,545          1,259,316     2015   (478,042)   454,163       (23,879)

Joseph P. Brandon

   2014     146,869    73,701     33,822          254,392     2017   $97,455 $ $40,248       $137,703
   2013     (146,523       13,545    $470,783     337,805     2016   44,939 (2,317) 39,282       81,904
   2012     33,349              305,283     338,632     2015   (43,777)   37,233       (6,544)

Christopher K. Dalrymple

   2014     445,079    190,070     67,214          702,363     2017   $328,206 $ $88,429       $416,635
   2013     (438,285    52,583     415,409     29,707     2016   145,194 (6,510) 84,472       223,156
   2012     181,122      48,809          229,931     2015   (140,953)   81,866       (59,087)

Roger B. Gorham

   2014     274,499         98,672          373,171     2017   $202,912 $ $111,616       $314,528
   2013     (282,916       86,783          (196,133   2016   72,774 (1,651) 116,187       187,310
   2012     150,602         86,942          237,544     2015   (69,311) 231,910 93,865       256,464

 

(1)For 2014,2017, the discount rate used was 4%3.50%; for 2013,2016, the discount rate used was 5%4.0%; and for 20122015 the discount rate used was 4%4.25%.

 

(2)For the Retirement Plan yearsyear ending in 2013 and 2012,2015, Alleghany electedamended the Plan to use aadjust the mortality assumption based on tables prescribed bybasis used to compute the Internal Revenue Servicepresent values for funding purposes.lump sums to theRP-2014 Annuitant male/female (50/50) blended basis mortality table using ScaleMP-2014 with generational projection. For the Retirement Plan year ending 2014,in 2016, Alleghany elected to change the mortality assumption used to compute the present values for annuities to the RP 2014RP-2014 base table with white collar adjustment and Scale MP -2014,MP-2016, which reflect updated mortality tables issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014.2016. In accordance with the Plan, the same mortality table change, using a male/female (50/50) blended basis, applied to the calculation of lump sums. For the Retirement Plan year ending in 2017, Alleghany did not change the mortality assumptions.

 

(3)Represents the change attributable to passage of time and increase in participant’s age.

 

(4)Amounts for each of Mr. Brandon and Mr. Dalrymple reflect additional accruals as their projected full service benefit in the applicable Retirement Plan year was greater than the retirement benefit accrued by him at December 13, 2010 when the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. For additional detail in this regard, see pages 63 and 64.

(5)Calculated in accordance with SEC rules governing preparation of the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 except for Mr.Messrs. Hicks, Brandon and Mr. GorhamDalrymple in 20132015, as SEC rules do not allow for inclusion of negative pension amounts in the Summary Compensation Table.

In order to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52, and as determined under applicable SEC rules, the table below presents SEC total compensation and then SEC total compensation without pension value

-61-

-56-


changes. The amounts reported in the SEC total without pension value changes are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings columns (but including the nonqualified deferred compensation earnings reported in that column, if any) from the amounts reported in the SEC Total column. The amounts reported in this column may differ substantially from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52.

Name

  Year   SEC Total
Compensation
   SEC Total
Compensation
without
Change in
Pension Value
 

Mr. Hicks

   2014    $10,543,046    $7,628,579  
   2013     7,447,725     7,447,225  
   2012     7,331,731     6,072,415  

Mr. Brandon

   2014     5,165,562     4,911,170  
   2013     4,830,467     4,492,662  
   2012     17,056,019     16,717,387  

Mr. Dalrymple

   2014     2,892,997     2,190,634  
   2013     2,098,832     2,069,125  
   2012     1,781,653     1,551,722  

Mr. Gorham

   2014     1,551,121     1,177,950  
   2013     1,155,184     1,155,184  
   2012     2,132,377     1,894,833  

Mr. Sennott

   2014     2,191,093     2,191,093  
   2013     2,543,002     2,543,002  

Employment Agreement with Weston M. Hicks

On October 7, 2002, Alleghany and Mr. Hicks entered into an employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. Hicks agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement, Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s salary is to be reviewed annually. In addition, if Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Hicks’Hicks’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period. The employment agreement was the result of anarm’s-length negotiation between the Executive Committee of the Board and Mr. Hicks and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Executive Committee determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Hicks, and the Compensation Committee and the Board approved such determination.

Employment Agreement with Joseph P. Brandon

On November 20, 2011, Alleghany and Mr. Brandon entered into an employment agreement which became effective on March 6, 2012 upon the closing of the TransRe acquisition, under which Mr. Brandon agreed to serve as Executive Vice President of Alleghany. Pursuant to the terms of this employment agreement:

 

Mr. Brandon’s salary is to be reviewed annually for increases but shall not be decreased.

 

If Mr. Brandon’s employment is terminated by Alleghany other than for “Cause” or other than in the case of his “Total Disability,” Alleghany will continue to pay his base salary in accordance with Alleghany’s

regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Brandon’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Brandon’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

-57-


regular payroll practices after such termination until such payments aggregate $1,000,000 on a gross basis. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Brandon’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Brandon’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

 

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a restricted stock unit matching grant agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, whereby Mr. Brandon was to receive a restricted stock unit matching grant under the 2007 LTIP of one restricted stock unit for every share of common stock Mr. Brandon purchased or received pursuant to stock dividends on those purchased shares, or “JPB Owned Shares,” on or before September 3, 2012 up to a maximum of $5.0 million worth of common stock. Material terms of this matching grant agreement, or the “JPB Matching Grant Agreement,” are discussed below.

Mr. Brandon and Alleghany entered into a success shares award agreement dated as of March 6, 2012, pursuant to which Mr. Brandon received an award (i) under the 2007 LTIP of 11,137 fully vested and non-forfeitable shares of common stock and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in the amount of $3.5 million. These shares are subject to restrictions upon transfer until the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2015, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock.

The employment agreement was the result of anarm’s-length negotiation between the Board and Mr. Brandon and was approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board. The Board determined that such provisions were appropriate and helpful in recruiting Mr. Brandon and completing the TransRe acquisition.

2012 Restricted Stock Unit Matching Grant Award to Mr. Brandon

Between March 6, 2012 and September 3, 2012, Mr. Brandon purchased 9,023 shares of common stock and, pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, Alleghany credited him with 9,023 restricted stock units. These restricted stock units are notional units of measurement denominated in shares of common stock and entitle Mr. Brandon to payment on account of such restricted stock units in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value,

-62-


as defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, on the payment date of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of restricted stock units to which Mr. Brandon is entitled to payment.

Pursuant to the terms of the JPB Matching Grant Agreement, the restricted stock units vest over a seven-year period, with 15% of the restricted stock units vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of the date of grant and 10% of the restricted stock units vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock units are to be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock, as the Compensation Committee may determine within ten business days of the applicable vesting date. If Mr. Brandon is terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the JPB Matching Grant Agreement), the restricted stock units scheduled to vest during such year shall vest on a pro rata basis for the amount of time Mr. Brandon was employed during such year. If Mr. Brandon voluntarily terminates his employment or Alleghany terminates his employment for Cause, all unvested restricted units shall be forfeited. Mr. Brandon has no voting or other rights in respect of the restricted stock units.

Mr. Brandon must maintain unencumbered beneficial ownership of the JPB Owned Shares continuously throughout the period commencing with the initial purchase of JPB Owned Shares and ending on the earliest to occur of (i) March 6, 2019, (ii) Mr. Brandon’s termination of employment for any reason or (iii) a merger approved by the Board effectuated by a tender offer or other major corporate transaction approved by the Board with respect to Alleghany’s common stock. To the extent Mr. Brandon fails to do so, he will forfeit one restricted stock unit for each JPB Owned Share with respect to which he has not maintained unencumbered beneficial ownership for the required period of time.

-58-


Letter AgreementAgreements with Mr. Gorham

Effective February 21, 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate to $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with Alleghany’s normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. “Cause” is defined as conviction of a felony, willful failure to implement reasonable directives of Alleghany’s chief executive officer after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof, or willful gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of Mr. Gorham’s duties. “Total Disability” is defined as Mr. Gorham’s inability to discharge his duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period. This letter agreement was terminated effective March 1, 2018, upon Mr. Gorham’s retirement.

Effective March 2, 2018, following his retirement, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a consulting arrangement pursuant to which Mr. Gorham agreed to provide consulting services primarily related to assisting his successor and Alleghany’s Senior Vice President and chief financial officer in executing responsibilities for Alleghany’s fixed income portfolio. In addition to fixed income portfolio support, upon the request of management, Mr. Gorham will also provide input to Alleghany management on topics of corporate finance, real estate investments, and asset allocation analysis. Pursuant to the terms of this consulting arrangement, Mr. Gorham will be paid a consulting fee of $25,000 per month. Such consulting arrangement will expire on March 2, 2019, unless so extended by Alleghany for an additionalone-year term.

 

-59--63-


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20142017 FiscalYear-End

 

 Stock Awards   Stock Awards

Name

 Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)
   Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested($)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested(#)
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested($)

Weston M. Hicks

          9,995(1)  $4,684,786           15,197(1) 9,046,780
          13,206(2)   6,189,520           13,278(2) 7,904,659
          16,656(3)   7,900,004           12,557(3) 7,475,136
          15,197(4)   7,122,448           11,093(4) 6,603,587

Joseph P. Brandon

          5,582(1)   2,615,993     2,256 1,342,893(5) 9,119(1) 5,428,425
          7,442(2)   3,487,757           7,967(2) 4,742,617
  6,316(5)  $2,960,293    8,990(3)   4,213,289           7,769(3) 4,624,743
          9,119(4)   4,273,750           6,285(4) 3,741,586

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          1,140(1)   534,236     759(6) 451,848 2,279(1) 1,356,437
          2,853(2)   1,337,173     697(7) 414,938 2,091(2) 1,244,814
          2,472(3)   1,158,602     680(8) 404,818 2,040(3) 1,214,453
  825(6)   292,496    2,279(4)   1,067,910     550(9) 327,426 1,652(4) 983,171
  759(6)   296,670          

Roger B. Gorham

          3,299(1)   1,546,058           911(1) 542,039
          3,488(2)   1,634,556           896(2) 533,109
          989(3)   463,300           942(3) 560,791
          911(4)   426,742           764(4) 454,527

John L. Sennott, Jr.

          1,062(1)   497,749     759(6) 451,848 2,279(1) 1,356,437
          1,593(2)   746,623     697(7) 414,938 2,091(2) 1,244,814
          2,214(3)   995,498     680(8) 404,818 2,040(3) 1,214,453
          2,279(4)   1,067,910     550(9) 327,426 1,652(4) 983,171
  759(6)   296,670          

 

(1)Performance shares granted under the 2007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP, for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2014.2017.

 

(2)Performance sharesShares granted under the 2007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP, for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2015.2018.

 

(3)Performance sharesShares granted under the 2007 LTIP (the 2012 LTIP, for Mr. Sennott), calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2016.2019.

 

(4)Performance Shares granted under the 2012 LTIP, calculated at maximum payout, which vest after completion of the award period ending December 31, 2017.2020.

 

(5)Restricted stock units granted under the 2007 LTIP which vest over a seven year period, with 15% vesting on each of the first six anniversaries of date of grant and 10% vesting on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 58.pages 62 and 63.

 

(6)Restricted stock unit award granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vests on January 15, 2018, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(7)Restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vest on January 15, 2019, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

-64-


(8)Restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vest on February 3, 2020, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(9)Restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2012 LTIP which cliff vest on January 19, 2021, the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

2017 Stock Vested

 

-60-


2014 Stock Vested

 Stock Awards(1)   Stock Awards(1)

Name

 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
 Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
  Dollar Value
Realized on Vesting

Weston M. Hicks

  11,437   $4,350,517     14,608   $9,462,478

Joseph P. Brandon(2)

  5,074    1,997,592     9,144   5,811,628

Christopher K. Dalrymple

  1,101    417,422     2,901   1,836,136

Roger B. Gorham

  3,650    1,383,825     857   555,130

John L. Sennott, Jr.

  531    201,318     1,840   1,191,878

 

(1)For each of Mr. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott, includes the gross amount of performance shares which vested upon certification of performance by the Compensation Committee on February 25, 201422, 2017 with respect to the award period ending December 31, 2013.2016. Payouts of such performance shares were made at 150%130% of target. The gross number of performance shares vested, and the form of payment, were as follows: Mr. Hicks, 11,47514,608 shares with a dollar value of $4,350,517$9,462,478 (paid in the form of 5,069 shares of common stock and $2,428,707 in cash); Mr. Brandon, 3,7219,144 shares with a dollar value of $1,410,743$5,811,628 (paid in the form of 1,327 shares of common stock and $4,979,057 in cash); Mr. Dalrymple, 1,1012,901 shares with a dollar value of $417,422$1,836,136 (paid in the form of 638207 shares of common stock and $175,537$1,702,050 in cash); Mr. Gorham, 3,650857 shares with a dollar value of $1,383,825$554,130 (paid in the form of 2,068 shares of common stock and $599,784 in cash); and Mr. Sennott, 5311,840 shares with a dollar value of $201,318$1,191,878 (paid in the form of 334485 shares of common stock and $74,689$877,715 in cash).

 

(2)Includes 1,353 restricted stock units which vested on September 2, 20143, 2017 pursuant to the JPB Matching Grant Agreement. The dollar value of such restricted stock units was $586,849 (paid in the form of 539 shares of common stock and $353,141 in cash). The terms of this award are described in more detail on page 58.pages 62 and 63.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal  Year-End
   Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End

Weston M. Hicks

  $ —    $151,563    $312,294    $(3,562 $2,526,937         $150,000   $191,777 $(3,525) $3,529,738

Joseph P. Brandon

        121,250     10,174     (2,850  396,768         127,344   29,395 (2,993) 822,895

Christopher K. Dalrymple

        89,688     47,297     (2,108  774,193         100,375   59,000 (2,358) 1,191,171

Roger B. Gorham

        90,000     90,152     (2,115  993,351     602,083   92,875   102,078 (16,333) 2,486,466

John L. Sennott, Jr.

        89,688     15,306     (2,108  157,151         100,375   (7,253) (2,359) 521,784

 

(1)Such amounts are included as a component of “All Other Compensation” for 20132017 set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 and discussed in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)Amounts represent interest earned on amounts credited to savings benefit accounts during 2013.2017. Such amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 as these amounts are not considered to be above-market interest.

The Deferred Compensation Plan, which was established in January 1982 and amended and restated in January 2011,December 2014, provides for unfunded deferred compensation arrangements for Alleghany officers and certain other employees. The following descriptions of “Savings Benefit Provisions” and “Compensation Deferral Provisions” of the Deferred Compensation Plan generally apply to amounts that were earned and vested under

-65-


the Deferred Compensation Plan after December 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested before January 1, 2005, or the “Pre-409A“Pre-409A Benefits,” are subject to less stringent requirements concerning the time of payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, but the substantive provisions that apply to thePre-409A Benefits are generally the same as described below.

-61-


Savings Benefit Provisions

All officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the date of election or appointment as an officer of Alleghany.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, each calendar quarter, we credit a book reserve account for each officer who is a participant at any time during such quarter with an amount equal to 3.75% of the officer’s base annual salary. This quarterly credit results in an annual credit of 15% of a participant’s base annual salary, which we refer to as the “Savings Benefit Credit.” Each participant may elect to have those amounts either credited with:

 

interest at the prime rate (the “Prime Rate Alternative”);

 

treated as though invested in common stock (the “Common Stock Alternative”); or

 

increased or decreased by an amount proportionate to the growth or decline of Alleghany stockholders’ equity per share (theshare(the “Stockholders’ Equity Alternative”).

In general, payment of these amounts is made or commences on the date elected by the participant, which may not be later than 12 months following termination of employment, either in a lump sum or in installments as elected by the participant.

If a participant chooses the Prime Rate Alternative, that interest is computed from the date the Savings Benefit Credit is credited until the date that the amount is distributed to the participant or the date that the participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. The “prime rate” for purposes of the Deferred Compensation Plan means the rate of interest announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank as its prime rate at the close of the last business day of each month, which rate is deemed to remain in effect through the last business day of the next month.

Amounts treated as invested in common stock reflect the investment experience which the account would have had if the amounts had been invested, without commissions or other transaction expenses, and held in whole or fractional shares of common stock during the deferral period. These amounts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect cash and stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar distributions or transactions which, from time to time, occur with respect to common stock. Dividends and other distributions are automatically credited at their cash value or the fair market value of anynon-cash dividend or other distribution and are deemed to purchase common stock on the date of payment thereof. Common stock is deemed acquired, and is valued for purposes of payout or transfer, at a price per share equal to the mean between the high and low prices thereof on the applicable date on the NYSE Consolidated Tape. A participant’s ability to elect to have his or her Savings Benefit Credit amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in our common stock is subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

With respect to 2014,2017, Mr. Hicks elected the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham elected to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to their Savings Benefit Credit; Mr. Sennott elected the Common Stock Alternative to apply to his Savings Benefit Credit; and Mr. Dalrymple elected to have the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit and to have the Prime Rate Alternative apply to 50% of his Savings Benefit Credit.

Compensation Deferral Provisions

The Deferred Compensation Plan provides that participants may elect to defer all or part of their base salary and annual incentive compensation each year other than compensation that would be paid in the form of common

-66-


stock. Thus, currently, no long-term incentive compensation payable pursuant to the 20072012 LTIP or 20122017 LTIP may be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prime rate, unless a participant elects the Common Stock Alternative or the Stockholders’ Equity Alternative. A participant’s decision to have deferred amounts treated as invested (or not invested) in common stock is also subject to compliance with applicable securities laws.

-62-


Pension Benefits

 

Name

 

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
   

Plan Name

 Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
for Benefit
Accrual
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

Weston M. Hicks

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  12   $11,354,082        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 11 $14,120,238  

Joseph P. Brandon

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  3    930,829        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 2 1,143,892  

Christopher K. Dalrymple

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  13    2,046,650        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 12 2,627,354  

Roger B. Gorham

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan  10    2,346,620        Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan 9 3,104,922  

John L. Sennott, Jr.

 Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   ��          Alleghany Corporation Retirement Plan   (2)  

 

(1)Reflects the estimated present value of the retirement benefit accumulated under the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 20142017 by the Named Executive Officers, based in part on (i) their years of credited service as of such date,December 31, 2013, as indicated in the table, and (ii) the Named Executive Officers’ average compensation as of December 31, 20142013 as determined under the Retirement Plan, which was $2,425,000 for Mr. Hicks, $1,000,000 for Mr. Brandon, $995,075 for Mr. Gorham and $459,167 for Mr. Dalrymple. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values for annuities are a discount rate of 4.00%3.50% and theRP-2014 Annuitantssex-distinct tables with white collar adjustment and ScaleMP-2016 with generational projection. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the present values for lump sums are a discount rate of 3.50% forpre-retirement interest, a30-year U.S. treasury rate of 4.00% for post-retirement interest and the 2015 Internal Revenue Service prescribedRP-2014 Annuitant male/female (50/50) blended basis mortality tables for the current valuation yeartable with separate tables for annuitantswhite collar adjustment and non-annuitants.ScaleMP-2016 with generational projection.

 

(2)Mr. Sennott commenced employment on April 16, 2013. In light of the expected amendment to the Retirement Plan which occurred in July 2013 and was effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

The Retirement Plan provides retirement benefits for our employees who are elected officers and who are designated as participants by the Board, including the Named Executive Officers. On July 16, 2013, the Board approved an amendment to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2013, whereby the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants and no additional benefit accruals would occur for existing participants after such date. AnyPursuant to this amendment, base compensation and future years of service are not taken into account when calculating a participant’s retirement benefits. However, future years of service with Alleghany by any participant who was not vested in his or her accrued benefit as of the freeze date will continue to have futuresuch service with Alleghany credited toward the Retirement Plan’s five-year vesting requirement. Furthermore, such future years of service will count towards early retirement eligibility and early retirement benefits determination for all participants. On November 17, 2015, the Board approved an amendment, or the “Plan Amendment,” to the Retirement Plan effective December 31, 2015. The Plan Amendment provides for the automatic adjustment of the mortality table used to make certain calculations in the Retirement Plan, in order to reflect revised mortality projections determined by Alleghany in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

Retirement benefits are paid, following termination of employment, in the form of an annuity for the joint lives of a participant and his or her spouse or, alternatively, actuarially equivalent forms of benefits, including a lump sum. Prior to January 1, 2011, the annual retirement benefit under the Retirement Plan, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor life annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or more years

-67-


of service, was equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary and annual cash bonus over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. On December 13, 2010, pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, the Compensation Committee amended the Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2011, by eliminating the inclusion of annual cash bonuses earned for years subsequent to 2010 in the computation of benefits. As amended, the annual retirement benefit would be the greater of (i) the retirement benefit accrued by the participant at December 31, 2010, based upon eligibility for vesting and years of service credited at such date, pursuant to the benefit formula in effect at December 31, 2010, or (ii) a full service retirement benefit, if paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity to a married participant who retires on reaching age 65 with 15 or morebased upon years of service credited at December 31, 2013, equal to 67% of the participant’s highest average annual base salary over a consecutive three-year period during the last ten years ending December 31, 2013 or, if shorter, the full calendar years of employment. The retirement benefit payable to a participant who retires on reaching age 65 with more than five but fewer than 15 years of service will equal the amount produced by the formula set forth in

-63-


clause (ii) of the preceding sentence multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of the participant’s years of service at December 31, 2013 and the denominator of which is 15, or, if greater, the retirement benefit accrued at December 31, 2010.

For purposes of the formula, base salary is the amount that would be included in the salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for the relevant years. For computations involving years when annual cash bonuses are included in the formula for determining the amount of the retirement benefit, the cash bonus is the amount of the cash bonus earned under the 2005 MIP or predecessor plan or any other annual incentive bonus plan or discretionary annual award that would be included in either the Bonus orNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table as earned in respect of the relevant years. The Retirement Plan’s benefit formula contains a factor which will reduce a married participant’s benefit payments to the extent that a participant is older than his or her spouse.

If a participant becomes totally disabled prior to retirement, then for the period of total disability the participant is treated as earning annual base salary in an amount which is equal to his or her annual base salary at the time of disability, with such base salary amount adjusted annually for inflation. Further, a participant’s period of disability will be treated as continued employment for all purposes under the Retirement Plan, including for purposes of determining his or her years of service.

A participant who has terminated employment may start to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan as early as age 55, but the benefit payable at that time will be reduced to reflect the commencement of benefit payments prior to Normal Retirement Age, which is defined as age 65 with 15 years of service. A participant who terminated employment with us after reaching age 55 and completing at least 20 years of service, or after reaching age 60 and completing at least 10 years of service, will have a smaller reduction (a reduction equal to 3% of his or her accrued benefit) than a participant who terminated employment prior to reaching such age or completing such number of years of service (a reduction equal to 6% of his or her accrued benefit), and therefore has a subsidized early retirement benefit. The benefit payable to a participant who retires after Normal Retirement Age is increased to the greater of (i) the benefit taking into account additional years of service, salary increases and (for years prior to 2011) bonuses paid through the actual date of retirement or (ii) the benefit that is actuarially equivalent to the lump sum that would have been payable at Normal Retirement Age, such lump sum increased with interest to reflect the passage of time since Normal Retirement Age. For all purposes of the Retirement Plan, a participant’s years of service are the number of years, including a fraction thereof, included in the period which starts on the date he or she becomes a participant, and which ends on the date his or her employment with us terminates.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, Mr. Hicks was age 5861 and had 1215 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. If Mr. Hicks had retired on December 31, 2017, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $15,247,820. As of December 31, 2014, Messrs.2017, Mr. Gorham was age 55 and had 13 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit

-68-


as of that date. If Mr. Gorham had retired on December 31, 2017, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $2,042,249. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Brandon was age 55 and had 5 years of credited service (for the purpose of early retirement qualification), thus he could have retired and begun to receive a retirement benefit as of that date. If Mr. Brandon had retired on December 31, 2017, the present value of his early retirement benefit would have been $995,348. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Dalrymple and Gorham werewas under age 55, thus neither of themhe would not have been eligible to receive a subsidized early retirement benefit if he had retired as of that date. If Mr. Dalrymple and Mr. Gorham had retired on December 31, 2014,2017, the present value of theirhis retirement benefits assuming commencement at theirhis earliest retirement datesdate and reflecting theirhis benefit elections under Section 409A of the Code would have been $1,017,858 for Mr. Dalrymple and $1,566,274 for Mr. Gorham. Mr. Brandon would not have been entitled to any retirement benefit if he had retired as of December 31, 2014 because he would not have had five years of service.$1,596,513. As noted above, in anticipation of the closing of the Retirement Plan to new participants effective December 31, 2013, the Board did not designate Mr. Sennott as a participant in the Retirement Plan.

-64-


Payments Upon Termination Ofof Employment

The table below provides information regarding the amounts that Messrs. Hicks, Brandon, Dalrymple, Gorham and Sennott would be eligible to receive upon any termination of employment by Alleghany other than for “Cause,” if such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2014:2017:

 

Name

 Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2007 and
2012 LTIP(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under

2010
MIP(4)
 Retirement
Plan(5)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
 Total  Severance
under
Employment
Agreement(1)
 Payments under
Restricted
Stock
Unit Matching
Grant Award(2)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under
2012 LTIP(3)
 Acceleration
of Payment
of Awards
under
2015
MIP(4)
 Retirement
Plan(5)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(6)
 Total

Weston M. Hicks

 $1,000,000       $15,057,540   $2,500,000   $9,616,562   $2,526,937   $30,701,039   $1,000,000   $14,737,390 $2,137,500 $15,247,820 $3,529,738 $36,652,448

Joseph P. Brandon

  1,000,000   $1,547,105    8,406,893    1,600,000        396,768    12,950,766   1,000,000 $1,342,893 8,841,589 1,275,000 995,348 822,895 14,277,725

Christopher K. Dalrymple

          2,383,394    600,000    1,385,073    774,193    5,142,660       2,265,716 502,000 1,596,513 1,191,171 5,555,400

Roger B. Gorham

  1,200,000        1,822,442    240,000    1,692,485    993,351    5,948,278   1,200,000   960,861 310,000 2,042,249 2,486,466 6,999,576

John L. Sennott, Jr.

          3,110,311    600,000        157,151    3,867,462       2,265,716 502,000   521,784 3,289,500

 

(1)These amounts would be paid by Alleghany upon termination other than for Cause, death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in the respective employment agreements) in the form of continued payments of base salary in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures.

 

(2)Reflects award amount payable to Mr. Brandon under his restricted stock unit matching grant award agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement if Mr. Brandon was terminated without Cause or by reason of his death or Total Disability (as such terms are defined in such matching agreement). The terms of this restricted stock unit matching agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement are described on page 58.pages 62 and 63.

 

(3)Reflects payment on a pro rata basis of all outstanding LTIP awards, including amounts paid in February 20142018 for the award period ending December 31, 2013,2017, based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the date of termination, in accordance with the terms of the awards.

 

(4)Reflects annual incentive earned in respect of 20132017 under the 20102015 MIP. These amounts, earned in respect of 20132017 performance, were paid to the Named Executive Officers in February 20142018 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 5258 and as described on page 47.pages 49 through 53.

 

(5)Reflects payment of vested pension benefits, computed as of December 31, 2013,2017, under the Retirement Plan to Messrs. Hicks, Dalrymple and Gorham. Mr. Brandon was not vested in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 20122017 and Mr. Sennott is not a participant in the Retirement Plan. The determination of these pension benefits is described in more detail on pages 63 and 64.67 through 69. This amount does not include retiree life insurance death benefit, equal to the annual salary of a participant at the date of retirement, payable to our Named Executive Officers.

 

(6)Reflects the aggregate vested account balance at December 31, 20132017 of each Named Executive Officer’s savings benefit (consisting of Alleghany contributions and interest earned thereon) under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

-69-


Certain of our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to payments in the event of the termination of their employment. These payments, other than those that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the Named Executive Officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees, are described below.

Pursuant to their employment agreements with Alleghany, Mr.Messrs. Hicks and Mr. Brandon would be entitled to receive continued payments of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.0 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. As described in more detail on page 58,pages 62 and 63, the restricted stock unit matching grant award agreement with Mr. BrandonJPB Matching Grant Agreement provides for a pro rata payment in the event of the termination of employment without Cause or termination of employment by reason of

-65-


Mr. Brandon’s death or Total Disability. In February 2013, Mr. Gorham and Alleghany entered into a letter agreement which provides for continued payments to Mr. Gorham of his base salary until such payments aggregate $1.2 million on a gross basis, payable in accordance with our normal payroll and procedures, following termination of his employment other than for Cause or in the event of his death or Total Disability. The foregoing agreements generally define “Cause” to mean conviction of a felony; willful failure to implement reasonable directives of the Chairman or the Board, as well as Alleghany’s chief executive officer in Mr. Brandon and Mr. Gorham’s cases, after written notice, which failure is not corrected within ten days following notice thereof; or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of any of their duties. “Total Disability” in the foregoing agreements generally is defined to mean inability to discharge duties due to physical or mental illness or accident for one or more periods totaling six months during any consecutive twelve-month period.

Other than the foregoing, there are no individual arrangements that would provide payments to our Named Executive Officers upon termination other than for cause or in the event of death or disability. We do not have any arrangements with our Named Executive Officers that would provide for payments upon a change of control of Alleghany or upon a change of control and subsequent termination of employment; although Mr. Brandon’s restricted stock unit matching agreementthe JPB Matching Grant Agreement does provide that hisMr. Brandon’s holding requirement for JPB Owned Shares will lapse upon a change of control.

A number of the plans described in this proxy statementProxy Statement have provisions that may result in payments upon termination of employment under certain circumstances as described below.

20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP

Awards under our 20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP provide for the pro rata payment of outstanding awards in the event of the termination of employment prior to the end of the award period. With respect to awards under the 20072012 LTIP and 20122017 LTIP, the pro rata payment would be based on the elapsed portion of the award period prior to termination and average annual compound growth in Book Value Per Share through the December 31st immediately prior to date of termination, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

20102015 MIP

Our 20102015 MIP also provides that, in the event of a participant’s death or disability prior to the end of the award period for an outstanding award, the participant (or in the event of the participant’s death, the participant’s beneficiary) shall receive such portion of the award, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. If the employment of a participant who has received a qualifying award is otherwise terminated during an award period, the participant shall not be entitled to receive any payment for such award unless the performance goals applicable to such award are achieved and certified by the Compensation Committee, in which case the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the qualifying award that would be payable to the participant upon the achievement of those performance goals. Pursuant to the 2015 MIP, if a participant who has received anon-qualifying award terminates employment for any reason (other than death or disability), the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that the participant is entitled to receive payment of all or any part of thenon-qualifying award.

-70-


Retirement Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

Additional payments upon any termination of employment would be made under our Retirement Plan, as long as the employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Retirement Plan at the time of the termination of employment. Our Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for payments of a participant’s vested savings benefit in the event of any termination of employment in the form previously elected by a participant subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as applicable, or if no election has been made, in a lump sum. Termination of employment will not cause an enhanced payment or other benefit to be made under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Information with respect to the Retirement Plan is set forth on pages 63 and 64,67 through 69, and information with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan is set forth on pages 6165 through 67.

CEO Pay Ratio

We are providing the following information about the relationship of the median annual total compensation of our employees and 62.the annualized total compensation of our chief executive officer. For 2017, our last completed fiscal year:

the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our chief executive officer) was $74,782; and

the annualized total compensation of our chief executive officer was $9,647,362.

Based on this information for 2017, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our chief executive officer’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 129:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K using the data and assumptions summarized below.

To identify our median employee, we first determined our employee population as of December 31, 2017, or the “Determination Date.” We had 3,603 employees, representing all full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees as of the Determination Date. This number does not include any independent contractors or “leased” workers, as permitted by the applicable SEC rules. Our employee population excludes approximately 1,620 employees in WWSC Holdings, Inc., our steel subsidiary, which we acquired in 2017.

Using our payroll records, we then measured the employee population’s taxable income for the period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017. We did not annualize the compensation for employees in temporary or seasonal positions or make any full-time equivalent adjustments.

Once we identified our median employee, we then determined that employee’s total compensation, including any perquisites and other benefits, in the same manner that we determine the total compensation of our Named Executive Officers for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table disclosed above. For 2017, the total compensation of our median employee was determined to be $74,782. For 2017, the total compensation of our chief executive officer was $9,647,362. Based on the foregoing, the total compensation amount for our median employee was compared to that of our chief executive officer to determine the pay ratio.

The SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

 

-66--71-


STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS

Alleghany’s TheBy-Laws, which are available on Alleghany’s website at www.alleghany.com, require that Alleghany be furnished with written notice with respect to:

 

the nomination of a person for election as a director, other than a person nominated by or at the direction of the Board; and

 

the submission of a proposal, other than a proposal submitted by or at the direction of the Board, at a meeting of stockholders.

In order for any such nomination or submission to be proper, the notice must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and the nominee or the proposal, as the case may be, and must be furnished to Alleghany generally not less than 30 days prior to the meeting.

In accordance with SEC Rule14a-8, in order for any proposal of a stockholder to be considered for inclusion in Alleghany’s notice of meeting, proxy statement and proxy relating to the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for Friday, April 22, 2016,26, 2019, the proposal must be received by the Secretary of Alleghany by November 17, 2015.

16, 2018.

 

-67--72-


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At any time prior to their being voted, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of Alleghany, submitting a new proper proxy dated later than the date of the revoked proxy, or by appearance at the 20152018 Annual Meeting and voting in person. A quorum comprising the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Alleghany’s common stock on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy for the transaction of business at the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

Solicitation of proxies will be made by mail, courier, telephone, facsimile ore-mail and, to the extent necessary, by personal interviews. Alleghany will bear the expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Brokers, custodians and fiduciaries will be requested to transmit proxy material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons at Alleghany’s expense. Alleghany has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies, and for its services Alleghany expects to pay fees of approximately $9,000$9,500 plus expenses.

 

-68--73-


EXHIBIT A

ALLEGHANY CORPORATIONLOGO

2015 DIRECTORS’ STOCK PLAN

1. PURPOSE. This Alleghany Corporation 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Plan”) has been adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Alleghany Corporation (the “Company”). The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its stockholders by attracting and retaining highly qualified individuals to serve as members of the Board who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and to encourage them to increase their stock ownership in order to promote long-term stockholder value through ownership of the common stock, $1.00 par value, of the Company (“Common Stock”). The purpose of the Plan will be accomplished through the grant of shares of Common Stock subject to the potential forfeiture and restrictions on transfer in Section 4 (“Restricted Stock”) or notional units of measurement, each equivalent to one share of Common Stock (“Restricted Stock Units”) or any combination thereof pursuant to the terms hereof.

2. ADMINISTRATION. The Plan shall be administered by the Board or a duly appointed committee thereof. The Board shall have all the powers vested in it by the terms of the Plan, such powers to include, without limitation, the authority (within the limitations described herein) to construe the Plan, to determine all questions arising thereunder and, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to adopt and amend such rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan as it may deem desirable. Any decision of the Board in the administration of the Plan shall be final and conclusive. The Board may authorize any one or more of its members or any officer of the Company to exercise the Board’s power over the day-to-day administration of the Plan, including executing and delivering documents on behalf of the Company.

3. ANNUAL EQUITY GRANTS. Each year, as of the first business day following the conclusion of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), each individual who was elected, reelected or continues as a member of the Board and who is not an employee of the Company or any subsidiary (a “Non-Employee Director”) shall automatically be granted either (x) such number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to $130,000 (or such higher amount as shall be determined by the Board from time to time) divided by the 30-Day Average Value (as defined below) of one share of Common Stock on the grant date or (y) if elected by the Non-Employee Director in accordance with Section 5(a), such number of Restricted Stock Units equal to $130,000 (or such higher amount as shall be determined by the Board from time to time) divided by the 30-Day Average Value of one share of Common Stock on the grant date, subject to payment as provided in Section 5. “30-Day Average Value” shall mean, with respect to any date, the average of the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the 30 consecutive trading days preceding the grant date as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded. In the event that an individual is appointed as a member of the Board after an Annual Meeting and at such time is a Non-Employee Director (an “Appointed Director”), such Appointed Director shall automatically be granted Restricted Stock (or if elected by such Appointed Director as provided herein, Restricted Stock Units) as of the date he is appointed to the Board (the “Appointment Date”), as to that number of whole shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units (with any fractional share rounded up) as is equal to (a) the number of shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that would have been granted pursuant to the applicable award that the Appointed Director would have received had he been elected at the immediately preceding Annual Meeting (as such number was adjusted pursuant to Section 7 hereof since the immediately preceding Annual Meeting), times (b) the ratio which the number of days from the Appointment Date until the next Annual Meeting bears to 365.

4. RESTRICTED STOCK.

(a) Restricted Stock granted under the Plan shall be issued for no consideration, but the Restricted Stock shall be forfeited to the Company (without the payment of any consideration) if the Non-Employee Director resigns from the Board prior to the Next Annual Meeting. In the event that a Non-Employee Director previously granted Restricted Stock shall terminate service as a Non-Employee director due to

death or disability prior to the vesting thereof, the Board may in its sole discretion determine to vest such shares of Restricted Stock, in full or in part. In addition, Restricted Stock shall not be sold, assigned, pledged or transferred to any person until the third anniversary of the date the Restricted Stock is granted or, in the case of Restricted Stock granted to an Appointed Director upon his appointment, the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting immediately preceding his appointment; provided that, in any case, the Restricted Stock shall automatically cease to be subject to the foregoing restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer upon the Non-Employee Director’s death prior to the Next Annual Meeting or, subsequent to the Next Annual Meeting, upon the date the Non-Employee Director ceases to be a director for any reason. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a Change in Control of the Company (as defined below), all restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer on shares of Restricted Stock (or shares that were previously Restricted Stock) shall lapse and be of no further force or effect.

(b) The Non-Employee Director to whom Restricted Stock is issued will have the customary rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares of Common Stock, including the right to vote the shares of Common Stock and to receive dividends paid thereon. Prior to the date the Restricted Stock ceases to be subject to the restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer in Section 4(a), dividends paid on such Common Stock in the form of additional shares of Common Stock or as securities or other property shall be subject to the same risk of forfeiture and other restrictions as the underlying shares of Common Stock with respect to which the dividend was paid.

(c) Any Restricted Stock issued under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Board in its sole discretion shall deem appropriate, including, without limitation, book-entry registration or by the issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any stock certificate is issued in respect of Restricted Stock, such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Non-Employee Director, and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

5. RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.

(a) To elect to be granted Restricted Stock Units in lieu of the automatic grant of Restricted Stock, a Non-Employee Director must affirmatively elect (an “Election”) to receive such Restricted Stock Units on or before the December 31st preceding the Annual Meeting in respect of which the automatic grant of Restricted Stock would otherwise be made; provided, however, that (i) a Non-Employee Director who is newly elected as a director at an Annual Meeting may make his Election before the date of such Annual Meeting at which the Non-Employee Director was first elected as a director and (ii) an Appointed Director may make his Election with respect to (x) the grant of Restricted Stock to be received at the next Annual Meeting on or before the later of (A) the date of the meeting of the Board at which he was appointed as a director or (B) the December 31st preceding that next Annual Meeting, and (y) the Restricted Stock to be received upon his appointment as a director, on or before the date of the meeting of the Board at which he was appointed as a director. Each Election shall be irrevocable after the last date that such Election may be made. Each Election to receive Restricted Stock Units may also include an election specifying the date or dates and/or event or events for the payment in respect of such Restricted Stock Units (each such date or dates and/or event or events being referred to herein as a “Payment Date”); provided that any Payment Date elected may not specify a date or event for payment that is prior to the third anniversary of the date such Restricted Stock Units are granted or, in the case of Restricted Stock Units granted to an Appointed Director upon his appointment, prior to the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting that immediately preceded his appointment (in either case, other than a Payment Date that provides for payment when the Non-Employee Director ceases to be a member of the Board). Each Payment Date: (i) specified as a calendar date must be January 1st and (ii) specified as an event shall be deemed to be the January 1st coinciding with or next following the specified event. A Non-Employee Director’s Election may provide that such Election shall remain in effect until revoked (which revocation must be made on or before the December 31st preceding the Annual Meeting at which such revocation is to take effect) with respect to all subsequently granted Restricted Stock Units.

(b) The Company shall establish and maintain a separate unfunded, bookkeeping account to which the Restricted Stock Units granted to a Non-Employee Director shall be credited (an “Account”), which Account shall reflect the investment experience that the Account would have had if such Account held whole or fractional shares of Common Stock equal to the number of whole or fractional Restricted Stock Units credited to the Account. A separate sub-Account shall be created to identify each grant of Restricted Stock Units for purposes of applying the provisions of the Plan. The Account (and each sub-Account) shall exist solely for record keeping purposes and shall not represent any actual interest in any shares of Common Stock. The right of any Non-Employee Director to receive payments in respect of Restricted Stock Units shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company. If any cash or stock dividends are paid on the shares of Common Stock represented by the Restricted Stock Units during the period between the date such Restricted Stock Units are granted and the Payment Date with respect to such Restricted Stock Units, then additional whole or fractional Restricted Stock Units shall be credited to the Non-Employee Director’s Account. Such credit shall be made as of the applicable dividend payment date. The number of whole or fractional Restricted Stock Units credited as a result of any cash dividends shall be determined by dividing (a) the aggregate dollar amount of the cash dividends by (b) the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the dividend payment date. For purposes of the Plan, Fair Market Value is the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the relevant date as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded, or, if no sale is made on such date, then Fair Market Value is the weighted average of the closing sales prices of the Common Stock on the next preceding day and the next succeeding day on which such sales were made as reported on the stock exchange or market on which the Common Stock is primarily traded. The additional whole and/or fractional Restricted Stock Units acquired with any cash or stock dividends shall be payable at the same time as the Restricted Stock Units representing the shares of Common Stock giving rise to the dividends. Notwithstanding anything contained herein or in any Election or Amended Election (as hereinafter defined) made by a Non-Employee Director to the contrary, if a Non-Employee Director resigns prior to the Next Annual Meeting following the date the Restricted Stock Units were granted, such Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited. In the event that a Non-Employee Director previously awarded or granted Restricted Stock Units shall terminate service as a Non-Employee director due to death or disability prior to the vesting thereof, the Board may in its sole discretion determine to vest such Restricted Stock Units, in full or in part, with settlement of such vested Restricted Stock Units to be determined in accordance with the Non-Employee Director’s Election. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a Change in Control of the Company, all restrictions on sale, assignment, pledge or transfer on shares underlying Restricted Stock Units shall lapse and be of no further force or effect.

(c) All payments in respect of whole Restricted Stock Units shall be made in the form of whole shares of Common Stock and any fractional Restricted Stock Unit shall be paid in cash based upon the Fair Market Value of the equivalent fraction of a share of Common Stock. Unless a Non-Employee Director’s Election provides otherwise, the Payment Date in respect of the Restricted Stock Units credited to a Non-Employee Director’s Account shall be the date that is the third anniversary of the date such Restricted Stock Units were granted or, in the case of Restricted Stock Units granted to an Appointed Director upon his appointment, the date that is the third anniversary of the first business day that followed the Annual Meeting that immediately preceded his appointment. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any Election or Amended Election made by a Non-Employee Director, if a Non-Employee Director dies, all Restricted Stock Units remaining in the Non-Employee Director’s Account shall be paid to the individual or entity designated by the Non-Employee Director in writing and filed with the Company (and if the Non-Employee Director did not designate a beneficiary or such designated beneficiary predeceases the Non-Employee Director, the Non-Employee Director’s beneficiary shall be the Non-Employee Director’s spouse, if any, or if none, his/her estate). All payments in respect of Restricted Stock Units shall be made as promptly as possible following the Payment Date and in any event, on or before the last day of the calendar year in which the Payment Date occurs.

(d) At least twelve months prior to the Payment Date with respect to any Restricted Stock Units, a Non-Employee Director may elect (an “Amended Election”) to defer distribution of all or any number of such Restricted Stock Units credited to his/her Account to a date occurring after the original Payment Date; provided, however, that (a) such Amended Election will not take effect for at least 12 months after the date on which it is made and (b) the distribution in respect of the Restricted Stock Units with respect to which the Amended Election is made must be at least 5 years from the original Payment Date. A Non-Employee Director’s Amended Election may otherwise provide for distribution at any time as could have been elected under an original Election.

(e) All Elections and Amended Elections shall be in writing and shall be effective on and when received by the Company pursuant to procedures established by the Board from time to time. An Amended Election when received pursuant to such procedures is irrevocable when received.

(f) No Restricted Stock Units shall be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to, or in favor of, or subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of a Non-Employee Director to, any party, nor shall any Restricted Stock Units be assignable or transferable by the recipient thereof.

6. AVAILABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. There may be issued under the Plan as Restricted Stock or as Restricted Stock Units granted in lieu of Restricted Stock, including any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units in respect of dividends thereon an aggregate of not more than 60,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 7.

7. DILUTION AND OTHER ADJUSTMENTS. In the event of any corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any subdivision or combination or exchange of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, split-off, recapitalization, capital reorganization, liquidation, reclassification of shares of Common Stock, merger, consolidation, extraordinary cash distribution, or sale, lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the Company), the number or kind of shares or other property (including cash) that may be issued or delivered under the Plan, the number of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units annually granted pursuant to Section 3 and granted in the aggregate under Section 6 shall be automatically adjusted, in the manner determined by the Board in its sole discretion, to give effect to the occurrence of such event so that the proportionate interest of the Non-Employee Director (and any person succeeding to such Non-Employee Director’s rights pursuant to the Plan) shall be maintained as before the occurrence of such event, and such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

8. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION. The Board, without the consent of any Non-Employee Director, may at any time terminate or from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part, including, without limitation, to increase or decrease the number of shares of Common Stock granted as Restricted Stock or as Restricted Stock Units in Section 3; provided, however, that no such action shall adversely affect any rights or obligations with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units previously granted under the Plan; and provided, further, that no amendment, without further approval by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with Section 10 below, shall (i) increase the aggregate number of shares subject to the Plan (other than increases pursuant to Section 7), (ii) extend the period during which Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units may be granted under the Plan as set forth in Section 10, or (iii) modify the requirements for eligibility to participate in the Plan.

9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

(a) Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to create any obligation on the part of the Board to nominate any director for re-election by the Company’s stockholders or to limit the rights of the stockholders to remove any director. Except as expressly provided for in the Plan, no Non-Employee Director or other person shall have any claim or right to be granted Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units under the Plan.

(b) The Company shall have the right to require, prior to the issuance of any shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan, the payment of, or provision by, a Non-Employee Director of any taxes required by

law to be withheld with respect to the issuance of such shares or otherwise. The Board shall be authorized to establish procedures for elections by Non-Employee Directors to satisfy such withholding taxes by delivery of, or directing the Company to retain, shares of Common Stock.

(c) The obligation of the Company to issue shares of Common Stock as Restricted Stock or in settlement of Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the satisfaction of all applicable legal and securities exchange requirements, including, without limitation, the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company shall endeavor to satisfy all such requirements in such a manner as to permit at all times the issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock as Restricted Stock and in settlement of Restricted Stock Units.

(d) No shares of Common Stock shall be issued hereunder unless counsel for the Company shall be satisfied that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal, state and other securities laws.

(e) Shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan may be original issue shares of Common Stock, treasury stock, shares of Common Stock purchased in the open market or otherwise.

(f) The Plan is intended to be operated in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”). If any provision of the Plan is subject to more than one interpretation, then the Plan shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with Section 409A.

10. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM. The Plan is effective when approved by the Company’s stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the 2015 calendar year by an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at such meeting. The Plan shall terminate immediately preceding the seventh annual meeting of stockholders following the annual meeting at which the Plan becomes effective, unless sooner terminated by action of the Board. No Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit may be granted hereunder after termination of the Plan, but such termination shall not affect the validity of any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit theretofore granted.

11. LAW GOVERNING. The validity and construction of the Plan and any agreements entered into thereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, but without regard to the conflict laws of the State of Delaware.

12. DEFINITION OF CHANGE IN CONTROL. For purposes of the Plan, a “Change in Control” of the Company shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events:

(a) Any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (a “Person”) becomes the beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of either (i) the then-outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”) or (ii) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”);provided,however, that, for purposes of this Section 12(a), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (A) any acquisition directly from the Company; (B) any acquisition by the Company; (C) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries or (D) any acquisition pursuant to a transaction that complies with Sections 12(c)(i), (ii) and (iii);

(b) Any time at which individuals who, as of the date immediately following the date of stockholder approval of the Plan, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;provided,however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date immediately following the date of stockholder approval of the Plan whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office

occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

(c) Consummation of a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (each, a “Business Combination”), in each case unless, following such Business Combination, (i) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent securities) and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent governing body), as the case may be, of the entity resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity that, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (ii) no Person (excluding any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of such corporation, except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination, and (iii) individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Board providing for such Business Combination constitute at least a majority of the members of the board of directors (or, for a non-corporate entity, equivalent governing body) of the entity resulting from such Business Combination; or

(d) Approval by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

EXHIBIT B

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN. The purpose of the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Management Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to allow Alleghany Corporation (the “Company”) to provide incentive compensation bonuses (“Incentive Bonuses”) to its officers, upon whom, in large measure, the sustained progress, growth and profitability of the Company depends. The Plan provides for the award of both Incentive Bonuses that are intended to satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation (“Qualifying Incentives”) in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (the “Code”), and Incentive Bonuses that are not intended to satisfy such requirements (“Non-Qualifying Incentives”).

2. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”). Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the exclusive authority to (i) select the officers to participate in the Plan, (ii) establish performance goals for Incentive Bonuses, including without limitation, any target, threshold or other level of performance that must be achieved to earn an Incentive Bonus, (iii) determine whether Incentive Bonuses will be Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives, (iv) establish each Participant’s Incentive Bonus opportunity (or range thereof), (v) determine the amount of the Incentive Bonus payable to any Participant, and (vi) make all other determinations and take all other actions necessary or appropriate for the proper administration and operation of the Plan. Any determination by the Committee on any matter relating to the Plan shall be made in its sole discretion and need not be uniform among Participants. The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned, including the Company, its stockholders and any Participant.

3. ELIGIBILITY. Incentive Bonuses under the Plan may be paid to those officers (including officers who are directors) of the Company who shall be selected by the Committee to participate in the Plan after consideration of management’s recommendations (the “Participants”). Participants may receive multiple Incentive Bonuses during the same year under the Plan.

4. PERFORMANCE PERIODS. Qualifying Incentives shall be payable to a Participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of the calendar year or such other period, not to be less than six months, as is selected by the Committee (a “Performance Period”). Non-Qualifying Incentives may be payable to a Participant as a result of the satisfaction of performance goals in respect of a Performance Period or as a result of the achievement of an individual objective or result, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

5. INCENTIVE BONUSES.

(a)Incentive Bonuses. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may grant Incentive Bonuses to any Participant, which Incentive Bonuses may be Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Participant may be granted one or more Qualifying Incentives or Non-Qualifying Incentives in respect of the same Performance Period and may be granted both Qualifying Incentives and Non-Qualifying Incentives at the same time or in respect of the same Performance Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the grant or payment of any Non-Qualifying Incentive shall not be made contingent on the failure to earn any Qualifying Incentive.

(b)Qualifying Incentives. Incentive Bonuses granted to any Participant who is a “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) for that Performance Period shall be a Qualifying Incentive unless otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The right to receive (or retain) any Qualifying Incentive shall be conditional upon the achievement of one or more performance goals established by the Committee in writing at the time such award is granted. Prior to the beginning of each Performance Period, or at such other time no later than such time as is permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall establish in writing (i) the performance goal or goals (as described in Section 5(c)), upon which a Participant’s Qualifying Incentive shall be based and (ii) after consideration of

management’s recommendations, the target (or range of) Qualifying Incentive opportunity for each Participant based upon the attainment of such performance goal or goals. The Committee may provide for a threshold level of performance below which no amount of a Qualifying Incentive will be paid and a maximum level of performance above which no additional Qualifying Incentive will be paid, and it may provide for the payment of differing amounts for different levels of performance. The Committee may provide that a Qualifying Incentive shall be determined as an amount or a percentage of a specified incentive pool based upon operating income, cash flow, earnings before income taxes, net income or other measures constituting a performance goal (as described in Section 5(c)), with such adjustments or exclusions as the Committee may determine; provided, however, that if the payment to a Participant of the Qualifying Incentive is based upon the attainment of one or more performance goals (as described in Section 5(c)) established by the Committee, the Committee may determine the amount of the incentive pool by reference to any measure (whether or not constituting a performance goal as described in Section 5(c)) as the Committee deems appropriate. The total amount or percentage of the incentive pool awarded to Participants shall not exceed 100% of the incentive pool, and the amount paid to any Participant from such incentive pool shall not be increased by any amount not paid to any other Participant.

(c)Qualifying Incentive Performance Goals. Performance goals, which may vary from Participant to Participant and from Qualifying Incentive opportunity to Qualifying Incentive opportunity, shall be based upon the attainment of specific amounts or percentages of, or increases or decreases in, one or more of the following: revenues; operating income; net operating income; cash flow; earnings before income taxes; net income; earnings per share; stockholders’ equity; return or net return on assets or net assets, investments, capital or equity; share price; share price appreciation; underwriting profits; gross or net premiums written; net premiums earned; compound growth in net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; loss ratio or combined ratio of the Company’s insurance businesses; operating efficiency or strategic business objectives consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets; business expansion goals; goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures; and productivity improvements, all whether applicable to the Company or any relevant subsidiary or business unit or entity in which the Company has a significant investment, or any combination thereof as the Committee may deem appropriate.

Each performance goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on, or otherwise employ, comparisons based on internal targets, the past performance of the Company or any subsidiary (or any business unit thereof) and/or the past or current performance of other companies or indexes, may provide for the inclusion, exclusion or averaging of specified items in whole or in part, including without limitation, catastrophe losses, realized gains or losses on strategic investments, acquisitions and divestitures, currency fluctuations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items whether of income or expense, accounting and tax changes, and any unusual or nonrecurring items, and, in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, shareholders’ equity and/or shares outstanding, assets or net assets.

(d)Qualifying Incentive Determination. As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Period but before any Qualifying Incentives are paid, the Committee shall certify in writing (i) whether the performance goal or goals were attained and (ii) the amount of the Qualifying Incentive payable to each Participant based upon the attainment of the performance goal or goals established by the Committee. The Committee may determine to grant a Participant a Qualifying Incentive equal to, but not in excess of, the amount specified in the foregoing certification. The Committee may also reduce or eliminate the amount of any Qualifying Incentive of any Participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain, specified personal goals established by the Committee. Under no circumstances may the Committee increase the amount of the Qualifying Incentive otherwise payable to a Participant beyond the amount originally established, waive the attainment of the performance goals established by the Committee for purposes of qualifying and Incentive Bonus as a Qualifying Incentive under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise exercise its discretion so as to cause any Qualifying Incentive not to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(e)Non-Qualifying Incentives. A Non-Qualifying Incentive may be awarded by the Committee to any Participant (including covered employees) at any time before, during or following the completion of any Performance Period and may, but need not, be conditioned upon the achievement of any performance goals established by the Committee. The Committee may increase, decrease or eliminate the amount of any Non-Qualifying Incentive awarded to any Participant at any time prior to payment thereof, based on such criteria as it shall determine, including but not limited to individual merit and attainment of, or the failure to attain or achieve, any performance goals or specified personal goals established by the Committee or management, and the Committee may waive the attainment of or modify the terms of any performance or personal goals established by the Committee or management or otherwise exercise its discretion in any manner with respect to any Non-Qualifying Incentive.

6. OTHER TERMS OF INCENTIVE BONUSES

(a)Death or Disability. In the event that a Participant previously awarded or granted an Incentive Bonus shall die or become disabled prior to the completion of the Performance Period with respect to such Incentive Bonus, the Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s beneficiary) shall be entitled to receive such amount, if any, of the Incentive Bonus granted or awarded to the Participant as shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the Committee, in its sole discretion, from granting a Non-Qualifying Incentive to any Participant in respect of the Participant’s employment by the Company prior to such Participant’s death or disability.

(b)Other Terminations of Employment. If a Participant’s employment terminates prior to the end of a Performance Period for any reason other than death or disability, the Participant shall not be entitled to receive any Qualifying Incentive established for the Participant; provided, however, that if the performance goals applicable to such Qualifying Incentive are achieved and certified by the Committee (in accordance with Section 5(d)), the Committee, in its discretion, may determine that the Participant shall be entitled to receive all or any part of the Qualifying Incentive that would be payable to the Participant based upon the achievement of those performance goals. If a Participant previously granted a Non-Qualifying Incentive terminates employment for any reason (other than death or disability), the Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that such Participant is entitled to receive payment of all or any portion of such Non-Qualifying Incentive.

(c)Payment. As soon as practicable following the Committee’s determination of the amount of any Qualifying Incentive payable to a Participant (in accordance with Section 5(d)), but no later than March 15th of such year, such Qualifying Incentive shall be paid by the Company in cash to such Participant. A Non-Qualifying Incentive shall be paid in cash promptly (and in any event within two and one-half months) following the date for payment specified by the Committee at the time a Non-Qualifying Incentive is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines that a Participant who died or became disabled shall be entitled to receive an Incentive Bonus, then such Incentive Bonus shall be paid to such Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s beneficiary) in cash promptly following the date for payment specified by the Committee at the time the Incentive Bonus is determined by the Committee, but in no event later than March 15th of the year following the year in which such death or disability occurred. Nothing contained in this Plan shall require the acceleration of the time of payment of any Incentive Bonus that the Participant has elected to defer under any deferred compensation plan or arrangement of the Company.

(d)Annual Maximum. The Qualifying Incentives, individually or in the aggregate, that could be payable to any Participant pursuant to the Plan in any single calendar year shall not exceed $5 million.

7. DILUTION AND OTHER ADJUSTMENTS.

To the extent that a performance goal is based on, or calculated with respect to, the Company’s common stock (such as earnings per share, book value per share or other similar measures), then in the event of any corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any subdivision or combination or

exchange of the outstanding shares of common stock, stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, split-off, recapitalization, capital reorganization, liquidation, reclassification of shares of common stock, merger, consolidation, extraordinary cash distribution, or sale, lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the Company), the Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in such performance goal as the Committee may in good faith determine to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants.

8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

(a)No Right to Incentive Bonus. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, no officer or other person shall have any claim or legally binding right to be paid any Incentive Bonus awarded or granted under the Plan prior to the actual payment thereof, and any Participant who terminates employment (other than due to death or disability) prior to the payment of an Incentive Bonus shall forfeit any right to receive such Incentive Bonus, regardless of the terms of any award or grant or any prior determination by the Committee.

(b)No Assurance of Employment. Neither the establishment of the Plan nor any action taken thereunder shall be construed as giving any officer or other person any right to be retained in the employ of the Company.

(c)Withholding Taxes. The Company shall have the right to deduct from all Incentive Bonuses payable hereunder any federal, state, local or foreign taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payments.

(d)No Transfers or Assignments. No Incentive Bonus under the Plan nor any rights or interests herein or therein shall be assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to, or in favor of, or subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of a Participant to, any party (other than the Company or any subsidiary), except, in the event of the Participant’s death, to his designated beneficiary as hereinafter provided.

(e)Beneficiary. Any payments on account of an Incentive Bonus payable under the Plan to a deceased Participant shall be paid to such beneficiary as has been designated by the Participant in writing to the Secretary of the Company or in the absence of such designation, according to the Participant’s will or the laws of descent and distribution.

(f)Non-exclusivity of Plan. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed in any way as limiting the authority of the Committee, the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company or any subsidiary to establish any other annual or other incentive compensation plan or as limiting the authority of any of the foregoing to pay cash bonuses or other supplemental or additional incentive compensation to any persons employed by the Company, whether or not such person is a Participant in this Plan and regardless of how the amount of such bonus or compensation is determined.

9. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN. The Board of Directors of the Company, without the consent of any Participant, may at any time terminate or from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part, whether prospectively or retroactively, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights of Participants; provided, however, that no amendment with respect to the terms of the Plan relating to the ability to grant awards that constitute, or affect, Qualifying Incentives that would require the approval of the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code shall be effective without such approval.

10. LAW GOVERNING. The validity and construction of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, but without regard to the conflict laws of the State of Delaware.

11. EFFECTIVE DATE. The Plan shall be effective when approved by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION  

 

 

 

 

Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.   x  

LOGO

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

LOGOLOGO  

Vote by Internet

  

 

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/YAL.

  

 

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone.

  

 

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

  

 

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There isNO CHARGE to you for the call.

  

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on April 24, 2015.

27, 2018.

 

LOGO

 

Alleghany Corporation Annual Meeting Proxy Card

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

 A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees andFOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

 

1. A  Election of DirectorsProposals —   
 

+

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.

1. Election of Directors For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  +
1a - John G. Foos¨¨¨   1b - William K. Lavin¨¨¨
For Against Abstain 

     1a - William K. Lavin

 For

 Against

 

Abstain 1b - Phillip M. Martineau

 1c - Raymond L.M. Wong

     
1c - Phillip M. Martineau¨¨¨   1d - Raymond L.M. Wong¨¨¨     

For

Against

Abstain

2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.

          

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

 

3.2.Say-on-Pay

Approval of 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan

Proposal to approve the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Directors’ Stock Plan.

¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

3.

Approval of 2015 Management Incentive Plan

Proposal to approve the Alleghany Corporation 2015 Management Incentive Plan.

¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

4.

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Alleghany Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.

¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

5.

Say-on-Pay

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of Alleghany Corporation.

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 

 

 B  Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted — Date and Sign Below.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

 

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
       /        /               

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

01ZNTC


LOGO

                                         02IMAE

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Alleghany Corporation 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on April 24, 2015.27, 2018.

Our proxy materials relating to our Annual Meeting (Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, Proxy and 20142017 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K) are also available on the Internet. Please go to www.envisionreports.com/YAL to view and obtain proxy materials online.

For comments and/or address changes, please send an email to info2@alleghany.com or call 1.888.752.1356.


 

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

+

PROXY — ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 24, 2015

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at the offices of Transatlantic Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., One Liberty Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, on Friday, April 24, 2015

+

PROXY — ALLEGHANY CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 2018

The undersigned hereby appoints Jefferson W. Kirby, Weston M. Hicks and Christopher K. Dalrymple proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and with authority in each to act in absence of the other, to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Alleghany Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Alleghany Corporation to be held at the offices of its subsidiary Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., One Liberty Plaza, 17th Floor, New York, New York, on Friday, April 27, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as indicated on the proposals described in the Proxy Statement, and all other matters properly coming before the meeting.

WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IMPORTANT — THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

 

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of Address

Change of AddressPlease print new address below.

 

    

 

¢IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH  SIDES OF THIS CARD.

+